Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Based on your knowledge of how the Hammett equation was developed (and basic organic mechanisms), show a mechanism and explain how a change in \(X\) will affect the rate of the following reaction.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In the context of the Hammett equation, a substituent (\(X\)) that's an electron-withdrawing group will accelerate the reaction by stabilizing the transition state, while an electron-donating group will decelerate the reaction by destabilizing the transition state. A step-by-step reaction mechanism can offer a visual and detailed insight into these alterations.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the mechanism

First and foremost, identify the general mechanism of the reaction being discussed. For example, it could be a nucleophilic substitution (SN1 or SN2) or an elimination (E1 or E2).
02

Understanding the role of X

Once the mechanism has been identified, understand how \(X\) (which is likely a substituent) affects the mechanism. If \(X\) is an electron-withdrawing group, it will stabilize the transition state by dispersing the negative charge, hence increasing the rate of the reaction. On the other hand, if \(X\) is an electron-donating group, it destabilizes the transition state by increasing electron density, thus decreasing the rate of reaction.
03

Visualizing changes

Construct a detailed, step-by-step mechanism that shows the changes when \(X\) is altered. This can include changes in the intermediate states, transition states, and the overall reaction rate. Comparing two different \(X\) groups (one electron-donating and one electron-withdrawing) for the same reaction could be helpful to visualize the contrast.
04

Conceptual explanation

Finally, give a specific explanation of how a change in \(X\) will affect the rate of the reaction, based on the Hammett equation and its principles. Use the constructed mechanism to support this explanation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Reaction Mechanism Analysis
To begin the process of reaction mechanism analysis, one imagines the step-by-step sequence of elementary reactions that lead to the overall chemical change. It's like piecing together a puzzle, where each piece represents the movement of electrons, formation of intermediates, and transition states that occur from reactants to products. In the context of the Hammett equation in organic chemistry, analyzing the reaction mechanism allows us to understand how different substituents, labeled as 'X' in our exercise, can influence the reaction pathway.

When analyzing the mechanism, it's crucial to note how 'X' interacts with the reaction center. For instance, if 'X' is attached to a benzene ring undergoing a reaction, does it stabilize or destabilize the carbocation intermediate in a nucleophilic aromatic substitution? What happens when 'X' is varied? By methodically comparing different 'X' groups, we leverage the power of the Hammett equation to predict changes in reaction rates, leading to more insightful conclusions about the nature of the reaction under study.
Electron-Withdrawing Groups
Electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) are substituents that pull electron density away from a reaction center, often through resonance or induction. Their presence in a molecule can profoundly affect the course of a reaction by stabilizing the transition states or intermediates. The power of EWGs lies in their ability to stabilize negative charges that may develop during a reaction, especially within a transition state.

For example, in a reaction where a negative charge develops on a carbon atom adjacent to 'X', if 'X' is an electron-withdrawing group like nitro (-NO2) or cyano (-CN), the negative charge can be distributed over a wider area, lowering the energy of the transition state and accelerating the reaction. This principle is vitally important when considering mechanisms and rates in reactions that involve carbocations or other positively charged intermediates.
Electron-Donating Groups
On the flip side, electron-donating groups (EDGs) do the opposite of EWGs. They donate electron density towards the reaction center, usually by resonance or less commonly by induction. EDGs, such as alkyl groups or methoxy (-OCH3), bring with them an interesting twist to reaction mechanisms. They tend to destabilize positive charges in transition states by increasing electron density, often leading to a slower reaction.

Nevertheless, EDGs can have a beneficial effect on reactions where negative charges need to be stabilized, such as in certain nucleophilic addition reactions. This duality demonstrates why understanding the nature of 'X' as either an electron-withdrawing or electron-donating group is pivotal for predicting reaction outcomes and designing new synthetic routes in organic chemistry.
Organic Reaction Rates
Organic reaction rates are influenced by a myriad of factors, such as the nature of the reactants, the presence of a catalyst, solvent effects, temperature, and the presence of various substituents. Among these, substituents play a significant role when it comes to the Hammett equation. They can either speed up or slow down a reaction, governed by their electronic effects. The Hammett equation ingeniously quantifies the effects of different substituents on the rates of benzene-derived reactions.

By assigning sigma values to a wide range of substituents, chemists can predict how a particular 'X' will affect the reaction rate without conducting the experiment. Positive sigma values correspond to EWGs that often lead to increased reaction rates, while negative sigma values are indicative of EDGs that might decrease reaction rates. Thus, a solid grasp of these principles provides one with a predictive tool, enabling the rationalization and design of new chemical transformations based on substituent effects.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What are some potential problems in using bioisosteric replacements for lead modification?

In solid-phase chemistry, the starting material and product of a reaction are bound to a solid support and the reagents are in solution. In solution-phase chemistry, the starting material and product are in solution and either reagents or reactant scavengers are frequently bound to solid support. What are some advantages of the latter mode of operation?

The \(\mathrm{LD}_{50}\) for a potential antiobesity compound was found to be \(10 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{kg}\) and the \(\mathrm{ED}_{50}\) was \(2 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{kg}\). Is this an important drug candidate? Why or why not?

Name some situations in which the endogenous ligand of a new biological target may not serve as a good lead compound.

a. A claimed advantage of solid-phase chemistry was that because excess reagents could be used and then readily removed (by filtration), purer products should result. What is the fallacy in this argument? b. Running many reactions in parallel generally implies that they are all done in the same solvent, at the same temperature, for the same time period, and with the same method of agitation, and that they are worked up in the same way. The efficiency advantages in this approach are evident. Name at least one potential disadvantage. c. Combinatorial power is increased substantially when more points of diversity are used in a library, i.e., many more compounds can be made using a comparatively small number of monomers. Give two reasons why more compounds under this circumstance may not be an advantage.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free