Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that you carry out an analytical procedure to generate a linear calibration curve like that shown in Figure 4-13. Then you analyse an unknown and find an absorbance that gives a negative concentration for the analyte. What might this mean?

Short Answer

Expert verified

When a negative concentration value is beyond an experimental error, there must be some errors in the analysis procedure. The reason is true for a value above 100% and it may be due to the extrapolation of the calibration curve.

Step by step solution

01

Linear Calibration Curve

The equation of a linear calibration line isy(sy)=[m±um]x+[b±ub], where y is the corrected absorbance.

Corrected absorbance =observed absorbance˗˗blank absorbance.

02

The reason for obtaining a negative concentration while analyzing an unknown analyte.

The reasons for obtaining a negative concentration are:

  • A negative value implies zero experimental error. If a negative value is obtained, it says that no detectable analyte is present.

  • When a negative concentration value is beyond an experimental error, there must be some errors in the analysis procedure.

  • The above reason is true for a value above 100% and it may be due to the extrapolation of the calibration curve.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Here are mass spectrometric signals for methane inH2:

CH4(vol%):00.0620.1220.2450.4860.9711.921Signal(mV):9.147.595.6193.8387.5812.51671.9

(a) Subtract the blank value (9.1) from all other values. Then use the method of least squares to find the slope and intercept and their uncertainties. Construct a calibration curve.

(b) Replicate measurements of an unknown gave 152.1, 154.9, 153.9 and 155.1mV , and a blank gave 8.2,9.4,10.6 and 7.8mV . Subtract the average blank from the average unknown to find the average corrected signal for the unknown.

(c) Find the concentration of the unknown, its standard uncertainty (ux) , and the95%confidence interval.

Blood plasma proteins of patients with malignant breast tumors differ from proteins of healthy people in their solubility in the presence of various polymers. When the polymers dextran and poly(ethylene glycol) are mixed with water, a two-phase mixture is formed. When plasma proteins of tumor patients are added, the distribution of proteins between the two phases is different from that of plasma proteins of a healthy person. The distribution coefficient ( K) for any substance is defined as K =[concentration of the substance in phase[concentration of the substance in phase B ]. Proteins of healthy people have a mean distribution coefficient of 0.75 with a standard deviation of 0.07. For the proteins of people with cancer, the mean is 0.92 with a standard deviation of 0.11.

(a) Suppose that Kwere used as a diagnostic tool and that a positive indication of cancer is taken asK0.92. What fraction of people with tumors would have a false negative indication of cancer becauseK0.92?

(b) What fraction of healthy people would have a false positive indication of cancer? This number is the fraction of healthy people withK0.92, shown by the shaded area in the graph below. Estimate an answer with Table 4 - 1 and obtain a more exact result with the NORMDIST function in Excel.

(c) Vary the first argument of the NORMDIST function to select a distribution coefficient that would identify 75% of people with tumors. That is, 75% of patients with tumors would have K above the selected distribution coefficient. With this value of K, what fraction of healthy people would have a false positive result indicating they have a tumor?

A trainee in a medical lab will be released to work on her own when her results agree with those of an experienced worker at the 95% confidence level. Results for a blood urea nitrogen analysis are shown below.

Trainee: x¯=14.57mg/dLs=0.53mg/dLn=6 samples

Experienced worker: x¯=13.95mg/dLs=0.42mg/dLn=5samples

(a) What does the abbreviation dL stand for?

(b) Should the trainee be released to work alone?

A Standard Reference Material is certified to contain 94.6 ppm of an organic contaminant in soil. Your analysis gives values of 98.6,98.4,97.2,94.6, and 96.2ppm. Do your results differ from the expected result at the 95% confidence level? If you made one more measurement and found 94.5, would your conclusion change?

For the numbers 116.0,97.9,114.2,106.8and 108.3, find the mean, standard deviation, standard uncertainty ( = standard deviation of the mean), range, and 90% confidence interval for the mean. Using the Grubbs test, decide whether the number 97.9should be discarded.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free