Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In an experiment analogous to that in Figure 28-3, the sampling constant is found to be \({K_{\rm{s}}} = 20\;{\rm{g}}.\)

(a) What mass of sample is required for a \( \pm 2\% \)sampling standard deviation?

(b) How many samples of the size in part (a) are required to produce \(90\% \)confidence that the mean is known to within\(1.5\% \)?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The mass of the sample for the given standard deviation is \(5\;{\rm{g}}\).

(b) In this case we should use \(7\) samples,\(n = 4.8,8.1,6.4,7.2,6.7\)

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Standard deviation.

  • The standard deviation is a measure of how far something deviates from the mean (for example, spread, dispersion, or spread). A "typical" variation from the mean is represented by the standard deviation.
  • Because it returns to the data set's original units of measurement, it's a common measure of variability.
  • The standard deviation, defined as the square root of the variance, is a statistic that represents the dispersion of a dataset relative to its mean.
02

Determine the mass of the sample

a)

Calculate the mass of sample with the following equation

\(\begin{aligned}{}m{R^2} &= {K_S}\\m &= \frac{{{K_S}}}{{{R^2}}}\\m &= \frac{{20\;{\rm{g}}}}{{{2^2}}}\\m &= 5\;{\rm{g}}\end{aligned}\)

Hence, the mass of the sample for the given standard deviation is \(5\;{\rm{g}}\).

03

Step 3:Calculate the number of samples.

b)

Use the equation 28-7 with \({s_s} = 0.02\)and \(e = 0.015\), the initial value of \(t\) is found on the Pg.72 Table \(4 - 4\) for confidence \(90\% \) :

\(\begin{aligned}{}n &= \frac{{{t^2}s_s^2}}{{{e^2}}}\\n &= \frac{{{{1.645}^2} \times {{0.02}^2}}}{{{{0.015}^2}}}\\n& = 4.8\end{aligned}\)

Next, for \(n = 5\) there are \({4^\circ }\) of freedom so \(t = 2.132\) which gives the following value of \(n\) :

\(n = \frac{{{t^2}s_s^2}}{{{e^2}}}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{}n &= \frac{{{{2.132}^2} \times {{0.02}^2}}}{{{{0.015}^2}}}\\n &= 8.1\end{aligned}\)

Then if we use in the same equation the \({7^\circ }\) of freedom \(t = 1.895\) this would give us the following value of \(n\) :

\(\begin{aligned}{}n &= \frac{{{t^2}s_s^2}}{{{e^2}}}\\n &= \frac{{{{1.895}^2} \times {{0.02}^2}}}{{{{0.015}^2}}}\\n &= 6.4\end{aligned}\)

Then with \(t = 2.015 \to n = 7.2\) and \(t = 1.943 \to n = 6.7\)So, we would use a total of \(7\) samples.

Therefore, in this case we should use \(7\) samples,\(n = 4.8,8.1,6.4,7.2,6.7\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

:(a) Describe the steps in QuEChERS and explain their purpose.

(b) Why is an internal standard used in QuEChERS?

(c) What is displayed in the total ion chromatogram in Figure 28-22?

(d) What is displayed in the extracted ion chromatogram in Figure 28-22? What is the difference between an extracted ion chromatogram and a selected ion chromatogram? Which would have greater signal-to-noise ratio?

(e) What mass spectrometric method could be used to obtain even greater signal-to-noise ratio from the same QuEChERS extract?

When you flip a coin, the probability of its landing on each side is \(p = q = \frac{1}{2}\)in Equations 28-2 and 28-3. If you flip it \(n\)times, the expected number of heads equals the expected number of tails \( = np = nq = \frac{1}{2}n.\)The expected standard deviation for \(n\)flips is\({\sigma _n} = \sqrt {npq} \). From Table 4-1, we expect that \(68.3\% \)of the results will lie within \( \pm 1{\sigma _n}\) and \(95.5\% \)of the results will lie within\( \pm 2{\sigma _n}\).

(a) Find the expected standard deviation for the number of heads in \({\bf{1000}}\) coin flips.

(b) By interpolation in Table 4-1, find the value of \(z\)that includes \(90\% \)of the area of the Gaussian curve. We expect that \(90\% \)of the results will lie within this number of standard deviations from the mean.

(c) If you repeat the\({\bf{1000}}\)coin flips many times, what is the expected range for the number of heads that includes\(90\% \) of the results? (For example, your answer might be, "The range \({\bf{490}}\) to \({\bf{510}}\) will be observed \(90\% \)of the time.")

Explain how to prepare a powder with an average particle diameter near \(100\mu m\) by using sieves from Table 28-2. How would such a particle mesh size be designated?

From their standard reduction potentials, which of the following metals would you expect to dissolve in \({\rm{HCl}}\)by the reaction\({\rm{M}} + n{{\rm{H}}^ + } \to {{\rm{M}}^{n + }} + \frac{n}{2}{{\rm{H}}_2}:{\rm{Zn}},{\rm{Fe}},{\rm{Co}},{\rm{Al}},{\rm{Hg}},{\rm{Cu}},{\rm{Pt}}\),\({\bf{Au}}\)?

(When the potential predicts that the element will not dissolve, it probably will not. If it is expected to dissolve, it may dissolve if some other process does not interfere. Predictions based on standard reduction potentials at \({\bf{2}}{{\bf{5}}^{^{\bf{o}}}}C\) are only tentative, because the potentials and activities in hot, concentrated solutions vary widely from those in the table of standard potentials.)

The county landfill in the diagram was monitored to verify that toxic compounds were not leaching into the local water supply. Wells drilled at 21 locations were monitored over a year and pollutants were observed only at sites\(8,11,12\), and 13 . Monitoring all 21 sites each month is very expensive. Suggest a strategy to use composite samples (Box 0-1) made from more than one well at a time to reduce the cost of routine monitoring. How will your scheme affect the minimum detectable level for pollutants at a particular site?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free