Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

How many 2.8-g samples must be analyzed to give 95% confidence that the mean is known to within ±4%?

Short Answer

Expert verified

6 no. of 2.8-g samples must be analyzed to give 95% confidence and the mean is known to within ±4.

Step by step solution

01

Assumption

From table 28-4 it can be determined that the value of sampling constant (Ks=mR2) is approximately constant for large samples, but this phenomenon is not true for the smallest sample. Therefore, for fig 28-3 we assign Ks =36 g. This is the average from the 1.3g and 5.8g samples in Table 28-4. Therefore, in this case for 2.8 g samples we can assume Ks =36.

Let,

Ks= Sampling constant

m = mass of particle

R= relative standard deviation

ss = Standard deviation

e = mean

n= number of particles or elements

02

Determine the number of samples

Ks=mR2R2=KsmR2=362.8R=±3.6%

For this case standard deviation should be ±3.6%

A 2.8g sample gives standard deviation (ss=3.6%) and expecting a mean value of (e=4%). Both the uncertainties must be expressed in relative form.

n=t2×ss2e2

Assume t=1.960 (Table 4-4 for 95% confidence interval and infinite degree of freedom)

n=1.96020.03620.042=3.13

For n=3 there will be 2 degrees of freedom. So, for second trial from table 4-4 we can assume students t value 4.303.

n=4.30320.03620.042=14.9915

For n=15 there will be 14 degrees of freedom. So, for third trial from table 4-4 we can assume students t value 2.150

n=2.1520.03620.042=3.7444

For n=4 there will be 3 degrees of freedom. So, for fourth trial from table 4-4 we can assume students t value 3.182.

n=3.18220.03620.042=8.208

For n=8 there will be 7 degrees of freedom. So, for fifth trial from table 4-4 we can assume students t value 2.365.

n=2.36520.03620.042=4.55

For n=5 there will be 4 degrees of freedom. So, for sixth trial from table 4-4 we can assume students t value 2.776.

n=2.77620.03620.042=6.246

For n=6 there will be 5 degrees of freedom. So, for seventh trial from table 4-4 we can assume students t value 2.571.

n=2.57120.03620.042=5.56

The trial reaches a constant value near n=6. Therefore, 6 no. of 2.8-g samples must be analyzed to give 95% confidence and the mean is known to within ±4.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Explain how dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction reduces the use of solvent in comparison with liquid-liquid extraction.

(b) What is the purpose of the disperser solvent, which is used in much greater volume than the extraction solvent?

Explain how to prepare a powder with an average particle diameter near \(100\mu m\) by using sieves from Table 28-2. How would such a particle mesh size be designated?

An example of a mixture of 1-mm-diameter particles of \({\rm{KCl}}\)and \({\rm{KN}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\)in a number ratio \(1:99\)follows Equation 28-4. A sample containing \({10^4}\)particles weighs\(11.0\;{\rm{g}}\). What is the expected number and relative standard deviation of \({\rm{KCl}}\)particles in a sample weighing\(11.0 \times {10^2}\;{\rm{g}}\)?

The following wet-ashing procedure was used to measure arsenic in organic soil samples by atomic absorption spectroscopy: A 0.1- to \({\bf{0}}.{\bf{5}} - \)g sample was heated in a \({\bf{150}} - {\bf{mL}}\) Teflon bomb in a microwave oven for \(2.5\;{\rm{min}}\) with \(3.5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of\(70\% \,\,\,{\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\). After the sample cooled, a mixture containing \(3.5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of \(70\% \,\,\,{\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3},1.5\;{\rm{mL}}\) of\(70\% \,\,{\rm{HCl}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\), and \(1.0\;{\rm{mL}}\) of \({{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\)was added and the sample was reheated for three \({\bf{2}}.{\bf{5}} - {\bf{min}}\) intervals with 2 -min unheated periods in between. The final solution was diluted with \(0.2{\rm{M}}\,\,\,{\rm{HCl}}\)for analysis. Why was \({\rm{HCl}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\) not introduced until the second heating?

Why is it advantageous to use large particles \(\left( {{\bf{50}}{\rm{ }}\mu {\bf{m}}} \right)\) for solid phase extraction, but small particles \(\left( {{\bf{5}}{\rm{ }}\mu {\bf{m}}} \right)\) for chromatography?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free