Chapter 28: Q4TY (page 776)
How many 2.8-g samples must be analyzed to give 95% confidence that the mean is known to within ±4%?
Short Answer
6 no. of 2.8-g samples must be analyzed to give 95% confidence and the mean is known to within ±4.
Chapter 28: Q4TY (page 776)
How many 2.8-g samples must be analyzed to give 95% confidence that the mean is known to within ±4%?
6 no. of 2.8-g samples must be analyzed to give 95% confidence and the mean is known to within ±4.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free(a) Explain how dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction reduces the use of solvent in comparison with liquid-liquid extraction.
(b) What is the purpose of the disperser solvent, which is used in much greater volume than the extraction solvent?
Explain how to prepare a powder with an average particle diameter near \(100\mu m\) by using sieves from Table 28-2. How would such a particle mesh size be designated?
An example of a mixture of 1-mm-diameter particles of \({\rm{KCl}}\)and \({\rm{KN}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\)in a number ratio \(1:99\)follows Equation 28-4. A sample containing \({10^4}\)particles weighs\(11.0\;{\rm{g}}\). What is the expected number and relative standard deviation of \({\rm{KCl}}\)particles in a sample weighing\(11.0 \times {10^2}\;{\rm{g}}\)?
The following wet-ashing procedure was used to measure arsenic in organic soil samples by atomic absorption spectroscopy: A 0.1- to \({\bf{0}}.{\bf{5}} - \)g sample was heated in a \({\bf{150}} - {\bf{mL}}\) Teflon bomb in a microwave oven for \(2.5\;{\rm{min}}\) with \(3.5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of\(70\% \,\,\,{\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\). After the sample cooled, a mixture containing \(3.5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of \(70\% \,\,\,{\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3},1.5\;{\rm{mL}}\) of\(70\% \,\,{\rm{HCl}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\), and \(1.0\;{\rm{mL}}\) of \({{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\)was added and the sample was reheated for three \({\bf{2}}.{\bf{5}} - {\bf{min}}\) intervals with 2 -min unheated periods in between. The final solution was diluted with \(0.2{\rm{M}}\,\,\,{\rm{HCl}}\)for analysis. Why was \({\rm{HCl}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\) not introduced until the second heating?
Why is it advantageous to use large particles \(\left( {{\bf{50}}{\rm{ }}\mu {\bf{m}}} \right)\) for solid phase extraction, but small particles \(\left( {{\bf{5}}{\rm{ }}\mu {\bf{m}}} \right)\) for chromatography?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.