Chapter 28: Q3TY (page 775)
By what factor must the mass increase to reduce the sampling standard deviation by a factor of 2?
Short Answer
The mass needs to be increased four times to reduce the sampling standard deviation by a factor of 2.
Chapter 28: Q3TY (page 775)
By what factor must the mass increase to reduce the sampling standard deviation by a factor of 2?
The mass needs to be increased four times to reduce the sampling standard deviation by a factor of 2.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free:(a) Describe the steps in QuEChERS and explain their purpose.
(b) Why is an internal standard used in QuEChERS?
(c) What is displayed in the total ion chromatogram in Figure 28-22?
(d) What is displayed in the extracted ion chromatogram in Figure 28-22? What is the difference between an extracted ion chromatogram and a selected ion chromatogram? Which would have greater signal-to-noise ratio?
(e) What mass spectrometric method could be used to obtain even greater signal-to-noise ratio from the same QuEChERS extract?
How many 2.8-g samples must be analyzed to give 95% confidence that the mean is known to within ±4%?
What mass of sample in Figure 28-3 is expected to give a sampling standard deviation of \( \pm 6\% \)?
From their standard reduction potentials, which of the following metals would you expect to dissolve in \({\rm{HCl}}\)by the reaction\({\rm{M}} + n{{\rm{H}}^ + } \to {{\rm{M}}^{n + }} + \frac{n}{2}{{\rm{H}}_2}:{\rm{Zn}},{\rm{Fe}},{\rm{Co}},{\rm{Al}},{\rm{Hg}},{\rm{Cu}},{\rm{Pt}}\),\({\bf{Au}}\)?
(When the potential predicts that the element will not dissolve, it probably will not. If it is expected to dissolve, it may dissolve if some other process does not interfere. Predictions based on standard reduction potentials at \({\bf{2}}{{\bf{5}}^{^{\bf{o}}}}C\) are only tentative, because the potentials and activities in hot, concentrated solutions vary widely from those in the table of standard potentials.)
Why is it advantageous to use large particles \(\left( {{\bf{50}}{\rm{ }}\mu {\bf{m}}} \right)\) for solid phase extraction, but small particles \(\left( {{\bf{5}}{\rm{ }}\mu {\bf{m}}} \right)\) for chromatography?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.