Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

EXAMPLE- Particles designated \(50/00\)mesh pass through a 50 mesh sieve bou are retained by a lo0 mesh sieve. Their size is in the range 0.150-0.300 mm.

does not pass is retained for your sample. This procedure gives particles whose diameters are in the range \(0.85 - 1.18\;{\rm{mm}}.\) We refer to the size range as \(16/20{\rm{mesh}}.\)

Suppose that much finer particles of \(80/120\)mesh size (average diameter \( = 152\mu {\rm{m}},\) average volume\( = 1.84\;{\rm{nL}}\)) were used instead. Now the mass containing \({10^4}\) particles is reduced from \(11.0to0.0388\;{\rm{g}}.\) We could analyze a larger sample to reduce the sampling uncertainty for chloride.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The mass of the mesh particle that reduces the \({\rm{KCl}}\)to a \(1\% \)uncertainty is \(0.61{\rm{ }}g.\)

Step by step solution

01

Concept used

The mass of the mesh particle that reduces the \({\rm{KCl}}\)to a \(1\% \)uncertainty must be computed.

In sampling n number of particles, the standard deviation is given as

\({S_{\rm{n}}} = \sqrt {{\rm{npq}}} \)

Where,

The chance of drawing B type particles is\({\rm{q}}\)

02

Step 2:

Solution:

The mass of the mesh particle that reduces the KCl to a\({\rm{1\% }}{\rm{.}}\)uncertainty.

\(1\% \)of\({\rm{KCl}}\)particle has the same standard deviation as \(1\% \) of np.

\({\sigma _{\rm{n}}} = \sqrt {{\rm{npq}}} \)

\({\rm{p}} = 0.01{\rm{q}} = 0.99\)we get \({\rm{n}} = 9.9 \times {10^5}particles\)

Using conventional sieves, the particle diameter is estimated.

Suitable for 170/200 mesh

\( = \frac{{0.090\;{\rm{mm}}(170{\rm{ sievenumber }}) + 0.075\;{\rm{mm}}(200{\rm{ sievenumber }})}}{2} = 0.0825\;{\rm{mm}}\)

\(\frac{4}{3}\pi {(0.0825\;{\rm{mm}})^3} = 2.35 \times {10^{ - 3}}\;{\rm{mL}}\)is used to compute the particle volume.

The mass of 1% chloride is computed as follows:

\(Mass = \left( {9.9 \times {{10}^5}} \right.particle)\left( {0.00236 \times \times {{10}^{ - 6}}\;{\rm{mL}}/} \right.particle)(2.108\;{\rm{g}}/{\rm{mL}}) = 0.61\;{\rm{g}}\)

Conclusion

The mass of the mesh particle that reduces the \({\rm{KCl}}\)to a\({\rm{1\% }}\)uncertainty was computed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Explain how dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction reduces the use of solvent in comparison with liquid-liquid extraction.

(b) What is the purpose of the disperser solvent, which is used in much greater volume than the extraction solvent?

How many 2.8-g samples must be analyzed to give 95% confidence that the mean is known to within ยฑ4%?

The following wet-ashing procedure was used to measure arsenic in organic soil samples by atomic absorption spectroscopy: A 0.1- to \({\bf{0}}.{\bf{5}} - \)g sample was heated in a \({\bf{150}} - {\bf{mL}}\) Teflon bomb in a microwave oven for \(2.5\;{\rm{min}}\) with \(3.5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of\(70\% \,\,\,{\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\). After the sample cooled, a mixture containing \(3.5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of \(70\% \,\,\,{\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3},1.5\;{\rm{mL}}\) of\(70\% \,\,{\rm{HCl}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\), and \(1.0\;{\rm{mL}}\) of \({{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\)was added and the sample was reheated for three \({\bf{2}}.{\bf{5}} - {\bf{min}}\) intervals with 2 -min unheated periods in between. The final solution was diluted with \(0.2{\rm{M}}\,\,\,{\rm{HCl}}\)for analysis. Why was \({\rm{HCl}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\) not introduced until the second heating?

From their standard reduction potentials, which of the following metals would you expect to dissolve in \({\rm{HCl}}\)by the reaction\({\rm{M}} + n{{\rm{H}}^ + } \to {{\rm{M}}^{n + }} + \frac{n}{2}{{\rm{H}}_2}:{\rm{Zn}},{\rm{Fe}},{\rm{Co}},{\rm{Al}},{\rm{Hg}},{\rm{Cu}},{\rm{Pt}}\),\({\bf{Au}}\)?

(When the potential predicts that the element will not dissolve, it probably will not. If it is expected to dissolve, it may dissolve if some other process does not interfere. Predictions based on standard reduction potentials at \({\bf{2}}{{\bf{5}}^{^{\bf{o}}}}C\) are only tentative, because the potentials and activities in hot, concentrated solutions vary widely from those in the table of standard potentials.)

Explain how to prepare a powder with an average particle diameter near \(100\mu m\) by using sieves from Table 28-2. How would such a particle mesh size be designated?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free