Chapter 28: Q1TY (page 773)
If 105 particles are taken, what is the relative standard deviation of each measurement?
Short Answer
The relative standard deviation for KCl and KNO3 particles will be 3.15% and 0.032% respectively.
Chapter 28: Q1TY (page 773)
If 105 particles are taken, what is the relative standard deviation of each measurement?
The relative standard deviation for KCl and KNO3 particles will be 3.15% and 0.032% respectively.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeWhen you flip a coin, the probability of its landing on each side is \(p = q = \frac{1}{2}\)in Equations 28-2 and 28-3. If you flip it \(n\)times, the expected number of heads equals the expected number of tails \( = np = nq = \frac{1}{2}n.\)The expected standard deviation for \(n\)flips is\({\sigma _n} = \sqrt {npq} \). From Table 4-1, we expect that \(68.3\% \)of the results will lie within \( \pm 1{\sigma _n}\) and \(95.5\% \)of the results will lie within\( \pm 2{\sigma _n}\).
(a) Find the expected standard deviation for the number of heads in \({\bf{1000}}\) coin flips.
(b) By interpolation in Table 4-1, find the value of \(z\)that includes \(90\% \)of the area of the Gaussian curve. We expect that \(90\% \)of the results will lie within this number of standard deviations from the mean.
(c) If you repeat the\({\bf{1000}}\)coin flips many times, what is the expected range for the number of heads that includes\(90\% \) of the results? (For example, your answer might be, "The range \({\bf{490}}\) to \({\bf{510}}\) will be observed \(90\% \)of the time.")
To pre-concentrate cocaine and benzoylecgonine from river water described at the opening of this chapter, solid-phase extraction was carried out at \({\rm{pH}}\,\,2\) using the mixed-mode cation-exchange resin in Figure 28-19. After passing \(500\;{\rm{mL}}\)of river water through \(60{\rm{mg}}\)of resin, the retained analytes were eluted first with \(2\;{\rm{mL}}\)of \({\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_3}{\rm{OH}}\)and then with \(2\;\,\,{\rm{mL }}of\,\,\,2\% \) ammonia solution in\({\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_3}{\rm{OH}}\). Explain the purpose of using \({\rm{pH}}2\) for retention and dilute ammonia for elution.
Many metals in seawater can be preconcentrated for analysis by coprecipitation with\({\rm{Ga}}{({\rm{OH}})_3}\). A \(200 - \mu {\rm{L}}\)HCl solution containing \(50\mu {\rm{g}}\)of \({\rm{G}}{{\rm{a}}^{3 + }}\)is added to \(10.00\;{\rm{mL}}\) of the seawater. When the \({\rm{pH}}\)is brought to \(9.1\)with\({\rm{NaOH}}\), a jellylike precipitate forms. After centrifugation to pack the precipitate, the water is removed and the gel is washed with water. Then the gel is dissolved in \(50\mu {\rm{L}}\) of \({\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\)and aspirated into an inductively coupled plasma for atomic emission analysis. The preconcentration factor is\(10\;{\rm{mL}}/50\mu {\rm{L}} = 200\). The figure shows elemental concentrations in filtered and unfiltered seawater as a function of depth near hydrothermal vents.
(a) What is the atomic ratio (Ga added): (Ni in seawater) for the sample with the highest concentration of\({\rm{Ni}}\)?
(b) The results given by gray lines were obtained with seawater samples that were not filtered prior to coprecipitation. Colored lines are from filtered samples. Results for Ni do not vary between the two procedures, but results for Fe vary. Explain what this means.
What mass of sample in Figure 28-3 is expected to give a sampling standard deviation of \( \pm 6\% \)?
The following wet-ashing procedure was used to measure arsenic in organic soil samples by atomic absorption spectroscopy: A 0.1- to \({\bf{0}}.{\bf{5}} - \)g sample was heated in a \({\bf{150}} - {\bf{mL}}\) Teflon bomb in a microwave oven for \(2.5\;{\rm{min}}\) with \(3.5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of\(70\% \,\,\,{\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\). After the sample cooled, a mixture containing \(3.5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of \(70\% \,\,\,{\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3},1.5\;{\rm{mL}}\) of\(70\% \,\,{\rm{HCl}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\), and \(1.0\;{\rm{mL}}\) of \({{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\)was added and the sample was reheated for three \({\bf{2}}.{\bf{5}} - {\bf{min}}\) intervals with 2 -min unheated periods in between. The final solution was diluted with \(0.2{\rm{M}}\,\,\,{\rm{HCl}}\)for analysis. Why was \({\rm{HCl}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\) not introduced until the second heating?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.