Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Calculate the frequency (Hz), wavelength(cm-1), and energy (J/photon and J/mols of photon]) of visible light with a wavelength of 562 nm.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The answer to the above question is,

(a).The frequency isv=5.34.1014hzv~

(b).The wavenumber isv~=1.78.104cm-1

(c). The energy isE=213075J/mol

Step by step solution

01

Calculate frequency:

v=cλ=3.108m/S2562.10-9mv=5.34.1014Hz

02

Calculate wavenumber:

v~=1λ=1562.10-9mv~=1.78.106m-1v~=1.78.104cm-1

03

Calculate Energy:

E=h.v=6.626.10-34Js.534.1014HzE=3.54.10-19J/photonsE=3.54.10-19J.6.022.1023mol-1E=213075J/mol

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In formaldehyde, the transition nπ*(T1)occurs at 397 nm,and the nπ*(S1)transition comes at 355 nm. What is the difference in energy (kJ/mol) between the S1andT1states? This difference is due to the different electron spins in the two states.

(a) A 3.96×10-4Msolution of compound A exhibited an absorbance of 0.624 at 238nmin a 1.000 cmcuvet; a blank solution containing only solvent had an absorbance of 0.029at the same wavelength. Find the molar absorptivity of compound A.

(b) The absorbance of an unknown solution of compound A in the same solvent and cuvet was 0.375 at 238 nm. Find the concentration of A in the unknown.

(c) A concentrated solution of compound A in the same solvent was diluted from an initial volume ofto a final volume of 25.00mLand then had an absorbance of 0.733. What is the concentration of A in the concentrated solution?

18-9 Why does a compound whose visible absorption maximum is at 480 nm (blue-green) appear to be red?

18-27. The iron-binding site of transferrin in Figure 18-8 can accommodate certain other metal ions besides Fe and certain other anions besidesData are given in the table for the titration of transferrin ( 3.57 mg in 2.00 mL ) with 6.64 mM Ga3+solution in the presence of the anion oxalate, C2O42-, and in the absence of a suitable anion. Prepare a graph similar to Figure 18-11, showing both sets of data. Indicate the theoretical equivalence point for the binding of one and two Ga3+ions per molecule of protein and the observed end point. How many Ga3+ions are bound to transferrin in the presence and in the absence of oxalate?

Gold nanoparticles (Figure 17-31) can be titrated with the oxidizing agent TCNQ in the presence of excess ofBr2-to oxidize Au(0)"toAuBr2-in deaerated toluene. Gold atoms in the interior of the particle are Au(0) . Gold atoms bound to C12H25S- (dodecanethiol) ligands on the surface of the particle are Au(I) and are not titrated.

The table gives the absorbance at $856 0.700 mL of 1.00×10-4MTCNQ+0.05M(C8H17)4N+Br-in toluene is titrated with gold nanoparticles (1.43 g/Lin toluene) from a microsyringe with a Teflon-coated needle. Absorbance in the table has already been corrected for dilution.

(a) Make a graph of absorbance versus volume of titrant and estimate the equivalence point. Calculate the Au(0) in 1.00 g of nanoparticles.

(b) From other analyses of similarly prepared nanoparticles, it is estimated that 25 % of the mass of the particle is dodecanethiol ligand. Calculate mmol of localid="1667559229564" C12H25Sin 1.00 g of nanoparticles.

(c) The Au(I) content of 1.00 g of nanoparticles should be 1.00 mass of Au(0) - mass of C12H25S. Calculate the micromoles of Au(I) in 1.00 g of nanoparticles and the mole ratio Au(I) :. In principle, this ratio should be 1: 1. The difference is most likely because C12H25Swas not measured for this specific nanoparticle preparation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free