Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

cd2+was used as an internal standard in the analysis of Pb2+by square wave polarography. Cd2+gives a reduction wave at -0.60 V and Pb2+gives a reduction wave at –0.40 V. It was first verified that the ratio of peak heights is proportional to the ratio of concentrations over the whole range employed in the experiment. Here are results for known and unknown mixtures:

The unknown mixture was prepared by mixing 25.00(±0.05)mLof unknown (containing only Pb2+) plus 10.00(±0.05)mLof 3.23(±0.01)×10-4MCd2+and diluting to 50.00(±0.05)mL.

(a) Disregarding uncertainties, find [Pb2+]in the undiluted unknown.

(b) Find the absolute uncertainty for the answer to part (a).

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Strength of undiluted unknown is 2.60×10-4M.

(b) Concentration of lead ion is 2.60(±0.09)×104M.

Step by step solution

01

Find the undiluted strength

(a) Calculating the concentration of a lead ions in a mixture containing cadmium ions and lead ions.

The internal standard equation is X=Pb2+and S=Cd2+.

The standard mixture response factor is given as

role="math" localid="1667558549294" SignalX[X]=Fsignalss[S]1.58μA[41.8μM]=F1.64μA[32.3μM]F=0.7445

Cadmium mixed with an unknown concentration is

=10.0050.003.23×10-4M=6.46×10-5M

The concentration of a lead ion in the diluted unknown and undiluted unknown is calculated as

SignalX[X]=Fsignalss[S]3.00μA[Pb2+]=0.74451.64μA[64.6μM][Pb2+]=130.2μM

The strength of undiluted unknown is50.0025.00130.2μM=2.60×10-4M

02

Find the absolute uncertainty

b. Calcualting the ambiguity in concentration of lead ion.

Comparative uncertainty in response factor is

F=(1.58±0.03)(32.3±0.1)(1.64±0.03)(41.8±0.1)=0.7445±0.0199(±2.67%)

Ambiguity in concentration of lead ion is

Pb2+=(3.00±0.03)(10.00±0.05)(50.00±0.05)3.23(±0.01)×104(2.00±0.03)(0.7445±0.0199)Pb2+=2.60(±0.09)×104M

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Chemical oxygen demand by coulonetry. An electrochemical device incorporating photooxidation on a \({\rm{Ti}}{{\rm{O}}_2}\) surface could replace refluxing with \({{\rm{C}}_2}{\rm{O}}_7^{2 - }\) to measure chemical oxygen demand (Box 16-2). The diagram shows a working electrode beld at \( + 0.30\;{\rm{V}}\) versus \({\rm{Ag}}\mid {\rm{AgCl}}\) and coated with nanoparticles of 'TiO . Wltraviolet2inradiation generates electrons and holes in \({{\rm{T}}_1}{{\rm{O}}_2}\). Holes oxidize

organic matter at the surface. Electrons reduce \({{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}\) at the auxiliary electrode in a compartment connected to the working compartment by a salt bridge. The sample compartment is only 0.18 mm thick with a volume of \(13.5\mu \,{\rm{L}}\). It requires \(\~1\;\,{\rm{min}}\) for all organic matter to diffuse to the \({\rm{Ti}}{{\rm{O}}_2}\) surface and be exhaustively oxidized.

Left: Working electrode. Fight Photocument response for sample and blank Both solutions contain \(2{\rm{M}}\,{\rm{NaNO}}\). (Dst from H zhso, D. fisng. 5 . zhang K. Cutteral, and R. Jshn, "Development of a Drect Fhotselectrocherrical Method for Deterrination of Gherrical Ouygen Demand," And. Chan. 2004, 76 155.)

The blank curve in the graph shows the response when the sample compartment contains just electrolyte. Before inradiation, no current is observed. Ultraviolet radiation causes a spike in the current, followed by a decrease to a steady level near \(40\mu \). This current arises from oxidation of water at the \({\rm{Ti}}{{\rm{O}}_2}\)sufface under ultraviolet exposure. The upper curve sbows the same experiment, but with wastewater in the sample compartment. The increased current arises from oxidation of organic matter. When the organic matter is consumed, the cument decreases to the blank level. The area between the two curves tells us how many electrons flow from oxidation of organic matter in the sample.

  1. Balance the oxidation half-reaction that occurs in this cell:

\({{\rm{C}}_e}{{\rm{H}}_k}{{\rm{O}}_a}\;{{\rm{N}}_s}{{\rm{X}}_x} + {\rm{A}}{{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}} \to {\rm{BC}}{{\rm{O}}_2} + {\rm{CX}} + {\rm{DN}}{{\rm{H}}_3} + {\rm{E}}{{\rm{H}}^ + } + {\rm{F}}{{\rm{e}}^ - }\)

where X is any halogen. Express the stoichiometry coefficients A, B, C, D, E, and F in terms of c, h, o, n, and x.

  1. How many molecules of \({{\rm{O}}_2}\)are required to balance the halfreaction in part (a) by reduction of oxygen (\({{\rm{O}}_2} + 4{{\rm{H}}^ + } + 4{{\rm{e}}^ - } \to 2{{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}\))?
  2. The area between the two curves in the graph is \(\int_0^\infty {({I_{{\rm{sample }}}}} - {I_{blank}})dt = 9.43\,{\rm{mC}}{\rm{.}}\) This is the number of electrons liberated by complete oxidation of the sample. How many moles of \({{\rm{O}}_2}\) would be required for the same oxidation?
  3. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) is expressed as mg of \({{\rm{O}}_2}\) required to oxidize 1 L of sample. Find the COD for this sample.
  4. If the only caidizable substance in the sample were \({{\rm{C}}_9}{{\rm{H}}_6}{\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}_2}{\rm{CIB}}{{\rm{r}}_2}\). what is its concentration in molL?

Consider the following electrolysis reactions.

Cathode:H2O(l)+e-12H2(g,1.0bar)+OH-(aq,0.10M)

Anode:Br-(aq,0.10M)12Br2(l)+e-

  1. Calculate the voltage needed to drive the net reaction if current is negligible.
  2. Suppose that the cell has a resistance of2.0Ω and a current of 100 mA. How much voltage is needed to overcome the cell resistance? This is the ohmic potential.
  3. Suppose that the anode reaction has an overpotential of 0.20 V and that the cathode overpotential is 0.40 V. What voltage is needed to overcome these effects combined with those of parts (a) and (b)?
  4. Suppose that concentration polarization occurs [OH-]s. at the cathode surface increases to 1.0 M and[Br-]s at the anode surface decreases to 0.010 M. What voltage is needed to overcome these effects combined with those of (b) and (c)?

Ti3+ is to be generated in 0.10MHClO4 for coulometric reduction of azobenzene.

TiO2++2H++eTi3++H2OE0=0.100V4Ti3++C6H5N=NC6H5+4H2O2C6H5NH2+4TiO2++4H+

At the counter electrode, water is oxidized, and \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) is liberated at a pressure of \(0.20\) bar. Both electrodes are made of smooth Pt, and each has a total surface area of 1.00cm2. The rate of reduction of the azobenzene is 25.9nmol/s , and the resistance of the solution between the generator electrodes is 52.4Ω.

  1. Calculate the current density (A/m2)at the electrode surface. Use Table 17-1 to estimate the overpotential for O2liberation.
  2. Calculate the cathode potential (versus S.H.E.) assuming that role="math" localid="1668356673323" [TiO2+surface]=[TiO2+]bulk=0.050Mand [Ti3+]surface=0.10M.
  3. Calculate the anode potential (versus S.H.E.).
  4. What should the applied voltage be?

Suppose we wish to electrolyze I-to I3-in a 0.10M Klsolution containing 3.0×10-5MI3-at pH 10.00with PH2=1.00bar.

3I-+2H2OI3-+H2(g)+2OH-

(a) Find the cell voltage if no current is flowing.

(b) Then suppose that electrolysis increases [I3-]to3.0×10-4M, but other concentrations are unaffected. Suppose that the cell resistance is2.0Ω, the current is 63 mA, the cathode overpotential is 0.382V, and the anode overpotential is 0.025 V. What voltage is needed to drive the reaction?

Find the voltage in part (b) ifrole="math" localid="1663645169401" [I-]s=0.01M.

A solution of Sn2+is to be electrolyzed to reduce the Sn2+to Sn(s). Calculate the cathode potential (versus S.H.E.) needed to reduce[Sn2+]to1.0×10-8Mif no concentration polarization occurs. What would be the potential versus S.C.E. instead of S.H.E? Would the potential be more positive or more negative if concentration polarization occurred?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free