Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Fundamentals of Electrolysis

17 - 6.The cell in Figure 17 - 4 is:

Cu|1.0MCuSO4(aq)|KCL(aq,3M)|AgCI(s)|Ag(s)

Write half-reactions for this cell. Neglecting activity coefficients and the junction potential betweenCuSO4(aq)and KCI(aq), predict the equilibrium (zero-current) voltage expected when the Lugging capillary contacts the electrode. For this purpose, suppose that the reference electrode potential is 0.197Vvs. S.H.E. Why is the observed equilibrium potential+109mV, not the value you calculated?

How would the over potentials change if>1.000Vwere imposed by the

Potentiostat?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The Potential is E = 0.142 V

(b) The over potentials would increase because current is increased. The anode is intercepted when > 0.122 V , while the cathode when < 0.085 V

Step by step solution

01

Fundamentals of electrolysis

  • Electrolysis is a fundamental process in chemistry that involves the breakdown of an electrolyte (a solution) and the creation of positive and negative ions.
  • This is the underlying concept of electrolytic cells.
  • The procedure may appear hard, yet it is as simple as a walk in the park.
02

Determine the potential

a)

The half-reactions for this cell is:

Cathode:Cu2++2e-CuSO4Anode:AGCL+e-Aq+Cl-

The Potential is E = E ( cathode ) - E ( anode )

So, we first calculate E of cathode:

E(cathode)=E°-0.05916.log(CuSO4)E(cathode)=0.339V-0.339VE(cathode)=0.339V

And, the E of reference electrode (anode) is:

E(cathode)=0.339VE(anode)=0.197V

The Potential is

E=0.339V-0.197VE=0.142V

The predicted potential is 0.142V , while the observed potential is 0.109V is from Cu2+activity coefficient and using the 3MKCI instead of saturated KCI.

Step 2: Determine the over potential by the potentiostat

b)

If > 1.000V were imposed by the potentiostat, the over potentials would increase because current is increased.

The anode is intercepted when > 0.122V , while the cathode when .

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A solution of Sn2+is to be electrolyzed to reduce the Sn2+to Sn(s). Calculate the cathode potential (versus S.H.E.) needed to reduce[Sn2+]to1.0×10-8Mif no concentration polarization occurs. What would be the potential versus S.C.E. instead of S.H.E? Would the potential be more positive or more negative if concentration polarization occurred?

Ti3+ is to be generated in 0.10MHClO4 for coulometric reduction of azobenzene.

TiO2++2H++eTi3++H2OE0=0.100V4Ti3++C6H5N=NC6H5+4H2O2C6H5NH2+4TiO2++4H+

At the counter electrode, water is oxidized, and \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) is liberated at a pressure of \(0.20\) bar. Both electrodes are made of smooth Pt, and each has a total surface area of 1.00cm2. The rate of reduction of the azobenzene is 25.9nmol/s , and the resistance of the solution between the generator electrodes is 52.4Ω.

  1. Calculate the current density (A/m2)at the electrode surface. Use Table 17-1 to estimate the overpotential for O2liberation.
  2. Calculate the cathode potential (versus S.H.E.) assuming that role="math" localid="1668356673323" [TiO2+surface]=[TiO2+]bulk=0.050Mand [Ti3+]surface=0.10M.
  3. Calculate the anode potential (versus S.H.E.).
  4. What should the applied voltage be?

Explain how the endpoint is detected in a Karl Fischer titration in Figure 17-35.

cd2+was used as an internal standard in the analysis of Pb2+by square wave polarography. Cd2+gives a reduction wave at -0.60 V and Pb2+gives a reduction wave at –0.40 V. It was first verified that the ratio of peak heights is proportional to the ratio of concentrations over the whole range employed in the experiment. Here are results for known and unknown mixtures:

The unknown mixture was prepared by mixing 25.00(±0.05)mLof unknown (containing only Pb2+) plus 10.00(±0.05)mLof 3.23(±0.01)×10-4MCd2+and diluting to 50.00(±0.05)mL.

(a) Disregarding uncertainties, find [Pb2+]in the undiluted unknown.

(b) Find the absolute uncertainty for the answer to part (a).

The figure shows the behavior of Ptand Ag cathodes at whichreduction ofH3O+toH2(g)occurs. Explain why the two curves arenot superimposed.

Current versus voltage forPtand Agelectrodes in O2 -free, aqueous H2SO4

Adjusted topH3.2.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free