Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The measurement of Li in brine (salt water) is used by geochemists to help determine the origin of this fluid in oil fields. Flame atomic emission and absorption of Li are subject to interference by scattering, ionization, and overlapping spectral emission from other elements. Atomic absorption analysis of replicate samples of a marine sediment gave results in the table.

(a) Suggest a reason for the increasing apparent concentration of Li in samples 1 through 3 .

(b) Why do samples 4 through 6 give an almost constant result?

(c) What value would you recommend for reporting the real concentration of Li in the sample?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. As a result, the interfering species in experiment 2 do not interact as much as they did in experiment 1.
  2. As a result, the hotter flame (higher temperature) is the cause of the constant results in tests 4 to 6.
  3. As a result, the true value can be calculated by averaging the two experiments 3 and 6. This is the same as the 81.4ppm.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Li

  • Lithium is a soft, silvery-white metal that belongs to group 1 of the periodic table of elements, the alkali metals.
  • It has a strong reaction with water. It's difficult to keep it safe. Because it is less thick and floats, it cannot be stored under oil like sodium.
02

Determine the increasing apparent concentration of Li in samples 1 through 3 .

(a)

  • It is necessary to speculate on the cause of the apparent increase in Li content in samples 1 through 3.
  • In comparison to experiment 1, the result in experiment 2 is better. This is due to the influence of interfering species being diluted. As a result, the interfering species in experiment 2 do not interact as much as they did in experiment 1.
  • Dilution reduces the concentration of species that can react with Li or produce smoke, which scatters light.
  • The amount of interference present in experiment 3 is the same as it was in experiment 2. In experiment 3, however, the interference is corrected using the standard addition approach.
  • Standard addition is used to apply the effect of the complex interfering matrix to the known quantities of analyte.
03

Draw the samples 4 through 6 give an almost constant result

(b)

  • The nearly constant results found in samples 4 to 6 must be explained.
  • In comparison to experiments 1 to 3, experiment 4 to 6 uses a hotter flame. The higher temperature removes the interference that was present at the lower temperature.
  • The interfering species' dilution has just a minor impact on the outcome. As a result, the hotter flame (higher temperature) is the cause of the constant results in tests 4 to 6.
04

Determine the real concentration of Li in the sample

(c)

  • It is necessary to make a recommendation for reporting the true concentration of Li in the sample.
  • We can deduce from the results of tests 1 to 3 that the usual addition produces a correct result. 3 and 6 are the experiments that are inside the experimental error limit.
  • As a result, the true value can be calculated by averaging the two experiments 3 and 6. This is the same as the 81.4 ppm.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain what is meant by spectral, chemical, ionization, and isobaric interference.

Laser atomic fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of sodium in an air-acetylene flame are shown here. In the excitation spectrum, the laser (linewidth 5 0.03 nm) was scanned through various wavelengths, while the detector monochromator (bandwidth 5 1.6 nm) was held fixed near 589 nm. In the emission spectrum, the laser was fixed at 589.0 nm, and the detector monochromator wave-length was varied. Explain why the emission spectrum gives one broad band, whereas the excitation spectrum gives two sharp lines. How can the excitation linewidths be much narrower than the detector monochromator bandwidth?

What is the purpose of a matrix-matched standard in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy?

Bone consists of the protein collagen and the mineral hydroxyapatite, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2. The content of archaeological human skeletons measured by graphite furnace atomic absorption sheds light on customs and economic status of individuals in historical times.37Explain why La3+is added to bone samples to suppress matrix interference in Pbanalysis.

Laser atomic fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of sodium in an air-acetylene flame are shown here. In the excitation spectrum, the laser (linewidth 5 0.03 nm) was scanned through various wavelengths, while the detector monochromator (bandwidth 5 1.6 nm) was held fixed near 589 nm. In the emission spectrum, the laser was fixed at 589.0 nm, and the detector monochromator wave-length was varied. Explain why the emission spectrum gives one broad band, whereas the excitation spectrum gives two sharp lines. How can the excitation linewidths be much narrower than the detector monochromator bandwidth?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free