Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why the information from an XPS chemical shift must also be contained in an X-ray absorption edge.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The chemical shift information provided by XPS must also be present in the compound's absorption edge of an X-ray absorption spectrum.

Step by step solution

01

Step : 1 Introduction

XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) can perform qualitative and quantitative analysis, and its most distinguishing feature is its ability to discern chemical states.

02

Step : 2 Explanation 

The minimal energy required to remove an electron from its orbital to a location where it is not affected by the nuclear charge is known as the XPS binding energy. The absorption edge is likewise caused by the same transition type. As a result, the chemical shift information collected by XPS must be present in the absorption edge of an X-ray absorption spectrum for a substance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An XPS electron was found to have a kinetic energy of 1055.3eVwhen ejected with an AlKฮฑsource

(ฮป=0.83393nm)and measured in a spectrometer with a work function of 25.1eV. The electron is believed to be a N(1s)electron in NaNO3.

(a) What was the binding energy for the electron?

(b) What would be the kinetic energy of the electron if a MgKฮฑ(ฮป=0.98900nm)source were used?

(c) How could one be sure that a peak was an XPS and not an Auger electron peak?

(d) At what binding and kinetic energies would a peak for NaNO2be expected when the AlKฮฑsource was used with the same spectrometer?

An XPS electron was found to have a kinetic energy of 1052.6eVwhen ejected with an AlKฮฑAlkฮฑsource and measured in a spectrometer with a work function of localid="1646388240338" 27.8eV. The electron is believed to be a localid="1646339446969" N(1s)electron in NaNO3.

(a) What was the binding energy for the electron?

(b) What would be the kinetic energy of the electron if a Mg Klocalid="1646339452408" ฮฑ(ฮป=0.98900nm)source were used?

(c) How could one be sure that a peak was an XPS and not an Auger electron peak?

(d) At what binding and kinetic energies would a peak for NaNO2 be expected when the AI Klocalid="1646339460791" ฮฑsource was used with the same spectrometer?

Name three possible sources of signals with the SEM. Differentiate between elastic and inelastic scattering of electrons.

Describe the mechanism of the production of an LMM Auger electron.

If the tunneling current is 8.7pmwhen an STM probe is 0.40nm from a surface and 17.0pAwhen the probe is 0.50nmfrom the surface, calculate the current on moving the tip in 0.10nmsteps from 0.40nm to 1.50nm.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free