Chapter 23: Q. 23.19 (page 632)
The standard electrode potential for the reduction of the Cu(II) complex of EDTA is given by
Calculate the formation constant for the reaction
Short Answer
The formation constant for the given reaction is .
Chapter 23: Q. 23.19 (page 632)
The standard electrode potential for the reduction of the Cu(II) complex of EDTA is given by
Calculate the formation constant for the reaction
The formation constant for the given reaction is .
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeA 40.00-mL aliquot of is diluted to 75.0 mL and titrated with . Assume the hydrogen ion concentration is at 1.00 M throughout the titration. (Use 1.44 V for the formal potential of the
cerium system.)
(a) Calculate the potential of the indicator electrode with respect to a Ag/AgCl(sat’d) reference electrode after the addition of 5.00, 10.00, 15.00, 20.00, 25.00, 40.00, 45.00, 49.00, 49.50, 49.60, 49.70, 49.80, 49.90, 49.95, 49.99, 50.00, 50.01, 50.05, 50.10, 50.20, 50.30, 50.40, 50.50, 51.00, 55.00, 60.00, 75.00, and 90.00 mL of cerium(IV).
(b) Construct a titration curve for these data.
(c) Generate a first- and second-derivative curve for these data. Does the volume at which the secondderivative curve crosses zero correspond to the theoretical equivalence point? Why or why not?
How does a gas-sensing probe differ from other membrane electrodes?
A sample of toothpaste was boiled with a solution containing a citrate buffer and to extract the fluoride ion. After cooling, the solution was diluted to exactly . The potential of an with a reference electrode in a aliquot of the sample was found to be . Addition of of a solution containingcaused the potential to change to . Calculate the mass percentage of in the sample.
Ceresa, Pretsch, and Bakker41 investigated three ISEs for determining calcium concentrations. All three electrodes used the same membrane, but differed in the composition of the inner solution. Electrode 1 was a conventional ISE with an inner solution of 1.00 x 10-3 M CaCl2 and 0.10 M NaCl. Electrode 2 (low activity of Ca2+) had an inner solution containing the same analytical concentration of CaCl2, but with 5.0 x 10-2 M EDTA adjusted to a pH of 9.0 with 6.0 x 10-2 M NaOH. Electrode 3 (high Ca21 activity) had an inner solution of 1.00 M Ca(NO3)2.
(a) Determine the Ca2+ concentration in the inner solution of Electrode 2.
(b) Determine the ionic strength of the solution in Electrode 2.
(c) Use the Debye-Hückel equation and determine the activity of Ca2+ in Electrode 2. Use 0.6 nm for the αX value for Ca2+ (see Appendix 2).
(d) Electrode 1 was used in a cell with a calomel reference electrode to measure standard calcium solutions with activities ranging from 0.001 M to 1.00 x 10-9 M. The following data were obtained.
Plot the cell potential versus the pCa and determine the pCa value where the plot deviates more than 5% from linearity (the limit of linearity; see Section 1E-2). For the linear portion, determine the slope
and intercept of the plot. Does the plot obey Equation 23-29 as expected?
(e) For Electrode 2, the following results were obtained.
Again plot cell potential versus pCa and determine the range of linearity for Electrode 2. Determine the slope and intercept for the linear portion. Does this electrode obey Equation 21-24 for the higher Ca2+ activities?
(f) Electrode 2 is said to be super-nernstian for concentrations from 10-7 M to 10-6 M. Why is this term used? If you have access to a library that subscribes to Analytical Chemistry or has web access to the journal, read the article. This electrode is said to have Ca2+ uptake. What does this mean and how might it explain the response?
(g) Electrode 3 gave the following results.
Plot the cell potential versus pCa and determine the range of linearity. Again determine the slope and intercept. Does this electrode obey Equation 23-29?
(h) Electrode 3 is said to have Ca2+ release. Explain this term from the article and describe how it might explain the response.
(i) Does the article give any alternative explanations for the experimental results? If so, describe these alternatives.
The cell
has a potential of 20.2094 V when the solution in the right-hand compartment is a buffer of pH 4.006.
The following potentials are obtained when the buffer is replaced with unknowns:
(a) 20.2806 V and (b) 20.2132 V. Calculate the pH and the hydrogen ion activity of each unknown.
(c) Assuming an uncertainty of 0.001 V in the junction potential, what is the range of hydrogen ion activities within which the true value might be expected to lie?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.