Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The standard electrode potential for the reduction of the Cu(II) complex of EDTA is given by

CuY2-+2e-Cu2+s+Y4-Eo=0.13V

Calculate the formation constant for the reaction

Cu2++Y4-CuY2-

Short Answer

Expert verified

The formation constant for the given reaction is 9.8×106.

Step by step solution

01

Given information 

The standard electrode potential for the reaction of the copper(II) complex of EDTA is given as 0.13V.

The chemical reaction is s follows:

CuY2-Cu2+s+Y4-

02

Formation constant  

Formation constant measures the strength of interaction between the reactant and the complex. It is equal to the ratio of complex or product to the reactants.

The formation constant for the Cu2++Y4-CuY2-reaction can be written as follows:

localid="1649235469557" Kf=CuY2-Cu2+Y4-Cu2+=CuY2-KfY4-...........1

03

Reduction reaction 

The reduction reaction for Cu2+to Cuis as follows:

Cu2++2e-Cus

The reduction potential is 0.337V.

04

Nernst equation  

The Nernst equation for the above reaction is represented as follows:

Ecell=Ecello-0.05922logCuCu2+........2

It is assumed that the activity of the liquid and solid substance is taken as 1.

05

Nernst equation and reduction potential

Substitute the concentration of each substance and equation (1) in the above equation (2) as follows:

Ecell=Ecello-0.05922log1Cu2+=Ecello-0.05922logKfY4-2CuY2-=Ecello-0.05922logKf...............3

06

Formation constant for the given reaction

Subsitute Ecelloand Ecellin the above equation (3) as follows:

data-custom-editor="chemistry" Ecell=Ecello-0.05922logKf0.13V=0.337V-0.05922logKf0.13V-0.337V=-0.05922logKf-0.207V=-0.0296×logKflogKf=-0.207V-0.0296logKf=6.993Kf=106.993=9.8×106

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A 40.00-mL aliquot of 0.0500MHNO2is diluted to 75.0 mL and titrated with 0.0800MCe4+. Assume the hydrogen ion concentration is at 1.00 M throughout the titration. (Use 1.44 V for the formal potential of the

cerium system.)

(a) Calculate the potential of the indicator electrode with respect to a Ag/AgCl(sat’d) reference electrode after the addition of 5.00, 10.00, 15.00, 20.00, 25.00, 40.00, 45.00, 49.00, 49.50, 49.60, 49.70, 49.80, 49.90, 49.95, 49.99, 50.00, 50.01, 50.05, 50.10, 50.20, 50.30, 50.40, 50.50, 51.00, 55.00, 60.00, 75.00, and 90.00 mL of cerium(IV).

(b) Construct a titration curve for these data.

(c) Generate a first- and second-derivative curve for these data. Does the volume at which the secondderivative curve crosses zero correspond to the theoretical equivalence point? Why or why not?

How does a gas-sensing probe differ from other membrane electrodes?

A 0.400-gsample of toothpaste was boiled with a 50-mLsolution containing a citrate buffer and NaClto extract the fluoride ion. After cooling, the solution was diluted to exactly 100mL. The potential of an ISEwith a Ag/AgCl(satd)reference electrode in a 25.0-mLaliquot of the sample was found to be -0.1823V. Addition of 5.0mLof a solution containing0.00107mgF-/mLcaused the potential to change to -0.2446V. Calculate the mass percentage of F-in the sample.

Ceresa, Pretsch, and Bakker41 investigated three ISEs for determining calcium concentrations. All three electrodes used the same membrane, but differed in the composition of the inner solution. Electrode 1 was a conventional ISE with an inner solution of 1.00 x 10-3 M CaCl2 and 0.10 M NaCl. Electrode 2 (low activity of Ca2+) had an inner solution containing the same analytical concentration of CaCl2, but with 5.0 x 10-2 M EDTA adjusted to a pH of 9.0 with 6.0 x 10-2 M NaOH. Electrode 3 (high Ca21 activity) had an inner solution of 1.00 M Ca(NO3)2.

(a) Determine the Ca2+ concentration in the inner solution of Electrode 2.

(b) Determine the ionic strength of the solution in Electrode 2.

(c) Use the Debye-Hückel equation and determine the activity of Ca2+ in Electrode 2. Use 0.6 nm for the αX value for Ca2+ (see Appendix 2).

(d) Electrode 1 was used in a cell with a calomel reference electrode to measure standard calcium solutions with activities ranging from 0.001 M to 1.00 x 10-9 M. The following data were obtained.

Plot the cell potential versus the pCa and determine the pCa value where the plot deviates more than 5% from linearity (the limit of linearity; see Section 1E-2). For the linear portion, determine the slope

and intercept of the plot. Does the plot obey Equation 23-29 as expected?

(e) For Electrode 2, the following results were obtained.

Again plot cell potential versus pCa and determine the range of linearity for Electrode 2. Determine the slope and intercept for the linear portion. Does this electrode obey Equation 21-24 for the higher Ca2+ activities?

(f) Electrode 2 is said to be super-nernstian for concentrations from 10-7 M to 10-6 M. Why is this term used? If you have access to a library that subscribes to Analytical Chemistry or has web access to the journal, read the article. This electrode is said to have Ca2+ uptake. What does this mean and how might it explain the response?

(g) Electrode 3 gave the following results.

Plot the cell potential versus pCa and determine the range of linearity. Again determine the slope and intercept. Does this electrode obey Equation 23-29?

(h) Electrode 3 is said to have Ca2+ release. Explain this term from the article and describe how it might explain the response.

(i) Does the article give any alternative explanations for the experimental results? If so, describe these alternatives.

The cell

AgAgClsatdIIH+a=xglasselectrode

has a potential of 20.2094 V when the solution in the right-hand compartment is a buffer of pH 4.006.

The following potentials are obtained when the buffer is replaced with unknowns:

(a) 20.2806 V and (b) 20.2132 V. Calculate the pH and the hydrogen ion activity of each unknown.

(c) Assuming an uncertainty of 0.001 V in the junction potential, what is the range of hydrogen ion activities within which the true value might be expected to lie?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free