Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why is an electrothermal atomizer more sensitive than a flame atomizer?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Sample efficiency is low in flame atomizers but high in electrothermal atomizers, which are more sensitive.

Step by step solution

01

Step1. Given information

an electrothermal atomizer has a higher sensitivity than a flame atomizer.

02

Step2.Low efficiency of the flame atomizer

In the case of a flame atomizer, the sample solution for atomization is first nebulized using an oxidant gas flow, then combined with gaseous fuel and atomized in a flame. A considerable portion of the sample is wasted here, running down the drain and resulting in low sample efficiency.

03

Step3. Sensitivity of electrothermal atomizer 

In the case of an electrothermal atomizer, sample evaporation occurs first, followed by burning to allow atomization to occur. In this situation, only a few microliters of sample are utilized, and the sample's efficiency is high. The time spent by the atoms in the optical path is increased by one second.

04

Step 4. Conclusion

From the above comparison, it can be said that an electrothermal atomizer is more sensitive than a flame atomizer.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suggest sources of the two signals in Figure 9-7 that appear during the drying and ashing processes.

Define the following terms: (a) releasing agent, (b) protective agent, (c) ionization suppressor, (d) atomization, (e) pressure broadening, (f) hollow-cathode lamp, (g) sputtering, (h) self-absorption, (i) spectral interference, (j) chemical interference, (k) radiation buffer, (l) solute volatilization interference

The sodium in a series of cement samples was determined by flame emission spectroscopy. The flame photometer was calibrated with a series of NaCl standards that contained sodium equivalent to 0, 20.0, 40.0, 60.0, and 80.0 ฮผg Na2O per mL. The instrument readings R for these solutions were 3.1, 21.5, 40.9, 57.1, and 77.3.

(a) Plot the data using a spreadsheet.

(b) Obtain a least-squares equation for the data.

(c) Calculate the statistics for the line in (b).

(d) The following data were obtained for replicate 1.000-g samples of cement that were dissolved in HCl

and diluted to 100.0 mL after neutralization.

Calculate the percentage of Na2O in each sample. What are the absolute and relative standard deviations for the average of each determination?

For Naatoms and Mg+ions, compare the ratios of the number of particles in the 3p excited state to the number in the ground state in (a) a natural gasโ€“air flame (2100 K). (b) a hydrogen-oxygen flame (2900 K). (c) an inductively coupled plasma source (6000 K).

In a hydrogen-oxygen flame, the atomic absorption signal for iron decreases in the presence of large concentrations of sulfate ion. (a) Suggest an explanation for this observation. (b) Suggest three possible methods for overcoming the potential interference of sulfate in a quantitative determination of iron.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free