Chapter 9: Q. 9.3 (page 228)
Why is an electrothermal atomizer more sensitive than a flame atomizer?
Short Answer
Sample efficiency is low in flame atomizers but high in electrothermal atomizers, which are more sensitive.
Chapter 9: Q. 9.3 (page 228)
Why is an electrothermal atomizer more sensitive than a flame atomizer?
Sample efficiency is low in flame atomizers but high in electrothermal atomizers, which are more sensitive.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeSuggest sources of the two signals in Figure 9-7 that appear during the drying and ashing processes.
Define the following terms: (a) releasing agent, (b) protective agent, (c) ionization suppressor, (d) atomization, (e) pressure broadening, (f) hollow-cathode lamp, (g) sputtering, (h) self-absorption, (i) spectral interference, (j) chemical interference, (k) radiation buffer, (l) solute volatilization interference
The sodium in a series of cement samples was determined by flame emission spectroscopy. The flame photometer was calibrated with a series of NaCl standards that contained sodium equivalent to 0, 20.0, 40.0, 60.0, and 80.0 ฮผg Na2O per mL. The instrument readings R for these solutions were 3.1, 21.5, 40.9, 57.1, and 77.3.
(a) Plot the data using a spreadsheet.
(b) Obtain a least-squares equation for the data.
(c) Calculate the statistics for the line in (b).
(d) The following data were obtained for replicate 1.000-g samples of cement that were dissolved in HCl
and diluted to 100.0 mL after neutralization.
Calculate the percentage of Na2O in each sample. What are the absolute and relative standard deviations for the average of each determination?
For atoms and ions, compare the ratios of the number of particles in the 3p excited state to the number in the ground state in (a) a natural gasโair flame (2100 K). (b) a hydrogen-oxygen flame (2900 K). (c) an inductively coupled plasma source (6000 K).
In a hydrogen-oxygen flame, the atomic absorption signal for iron decreases in the presence of large concentrations of sulfate ion. (a) Suggest an explanation for this observation. (b) Suggest three possible methods for overcoming the potential interference of sulfate in a quantitative determination of iron.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.