Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Describe the effects that are responsible for the three different absorbance profiles in Figure 9-4 and select three additional elements you would expect to have similar profiles.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Mg absorption initially increases with flame height, but later decreases due to the interaction of Mg ions with oxygen absorption.

Absorption of Ag rises with flame height.

The absorption of Cr reduces as the flame height increases.

Magnesium and calcium have the same absorption profile.

Gold has the same absorption profile as silver.

Vanadium has the same absorption spectrum as chromium.

Step by step solution

01

Step1. Given information

The image depicts the effect of an absorption profile of three different elements. Other factors, such as this absorption profile, must also be described.

Absorption vs. height of elements Mg, Cr and Ag is given below:-

02

Step2.Diagram explanation for magnesium

When Mg reaches the flame, its absorption profile first increases. Following that, Mg atomization occurs, resulting in the release of free atoms. These atoms produce magnesium ions, which combine with oxygen to form MgO, causing the condition absorption profile of Mg to diminish. As a result, magnesium absorption increases with height until atomization, at which point it begins to decrease.

03

Step3. Diagram explanation for silver and chromium

The absorbance of element Ag, or silver, increases with the height of the flame. Silver does not oxidize quickly, and as the atomization of silver-free atoms increases, so does the absorption of this element with the height of the flame.

This element oxidizes quickly in the presence of Cr. When Cr comes into contact with a flame, it oxidizes and forms chromium oxide, which has no absorbance. As a result, chromium absorption decreases with increasing flame height.

04

Step4. Three additional elements one would expect to have similar profiles.

Calcium has an absorbance profile that is similar to Mg's. This element's absorption profile initially increases with flame height until atomization. After then, it combines with oxygen, and the absorption begins to diminish as the flame height increases.

Vanadium's absorption profile is comparable to that of chromium. The absorption of this element reduces as the flame height increases. This element will oxidize as soon as it comes into contact with the flame.

Gold does not easily oxidize. It has the same absorption profile as silver. As a result, as the height of the flame increases, so will the absorption of the gold element.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An analyst attempts to determine strontium with an atomic absorption instrument equipped with a nitrous oxideโ€“acetylene burner, but the sensitivity associated with the 460.7-nm atomic resonance line is not satisfactory. Suggest at least three things that might be tried to increase sensitivity.

For Naatoms and Mg+ions, compare the ratios of the number of particles in the 3p excited state to the number in the ground state in (a) a natural gasโ€“air flame (2100 K). (b) a hydrogen-oxygen flame (2900 K). (c) an inductively coupled plasma source (6000 K).

(a) In an investigation of the influence of experimental variables on detection limits in electrothermal AAS, Cabon and Bihan found several factors to be significant in the optimization of the method.23

List six of these factors, describe in detail the physical basis for each factor, and discuss why each is important.

(b) These workers describe an a priori method for determining the limit of detection (LOD). Compare and contrast this method with the method described in Section 1E-2. How does this method improve on the method as defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) in the หOrange Bookห? See http://www.iupac.org/publications/analytical_compendium/. Describe any disadvantages of the method.

(c) The investigations described by Cabon and Bihan treated the data using least-squares polynomial smoothing (see Section 5C-2) prior to determining the LOD. Describe precisely how the data were

smoothed. What experimental variable was optimized in the smoothing procedure? How was the width of the smoothing window defined? What effect, if any, did the smoothing procedure have on the LOD as determined by these workers? What effect did smoothing have on the determination of the integration window for the instrumental signal?

(d) These workers compared the determination of the signal magnitude by integration and by measuring

peak signals. What was the outcome of this comparison? Explain why these results were obtained by

using your understanding of signal-to-noise enhancement procedures.

(e) How were instrument signals integrated? What alternative numerical procedures are available for integrating

digital signals? What procedural variable or variables influenced the quality of the integrated signal data? Describe the effect of signal integration on working curves for Pb.

(f) What is dosing volume, and what effect did it appear to have on the quality of the results in these procedures?

The chromium in an aqueous sample was determined by pipetting 10.0 mL of the unknown into each of five 50.0-mL volumetric flasks. Various volumes of a standard containing 12.2 ppm Cr were added to the flasks, following which the solutions were diluted to volume.

(a) Plot the data using a spreadsheet.

(b) Determine an equation for the relationship between absorbance and volume of standard.

(c) Calculate the statistics for the least-squares relationship in (b).

(d) Determine the concentration of Cr in ppm in the sample.

(e) Find the standard deviation of the result in (d).

Why is an electrothermal atomizer more sensitive than a flame atomizer?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free