Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Use Equation 7-13 for the resolving power of a grating monochromator to estimate the theoretical minimum size of a diffraction grating that would provide a profile of an atomic absorption line at 500 nm having a line width of 0.002 nm. Assume that the grating is to be used in the first order and that it has been ruled at 2400 grooves/mm.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Minimum theoretical size of first order grating is 104 mm.

Step by step solution

01

Step1. Given information

Linewidth=0.002nmλ=500nm

02

Step2.Resolving power

The resolving power is a measurement taken to ensure a clear view of an object. The ratio of wavelength and difference of wavelength or the multiplication of order of diffraction with the number of lighting blazes by radiation yields the resolving power.

03

Step3. Formula for resolving power

R=λλ

=nN

Here, λis the wavelength and λis the wavelength difference, and nis the diffraction order, andNis the total number of slits.

04

Step4. Calculate Resolving power 

Resolving power can be calculated by using the formula given in step 3 as follows:-

R=500nm0.002nm=2.5×105

05

Step5. Calculate the total number of slits

The total number of slits can be calculated by using the formula given in step3 as follows:-

Substitute 1 for n as the first-order grating is used.

1.2×105=n×N1.2×105=1×NN=1.2×105

06

Step6. Calculate the theoretical minimum size of a diffraction grating 

Width=Nnumberofgroovespermillimeter

Substitute 1.2×105for N, and 2400groovesmmfor number of grooves per millimeter in the above equation as follows:-

Sizeofgrating=2.5×105grooves2400groovesmm=104mm

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Define the following terms: (a) releasing agent, (b) protective agent, (c) ionization suppressor, (d) atomization, (e) pressure broadening, (f) hollow-cathode lamp, (g) sputtering, (h) self-absorption, (i) spectral interference, (j) chemical interference, (k) radiation buffer, (l) solute volatilization interference

(a) In an investigation of the influence of experimental variables on detection limits in electrothermal AAS, Cabon and Bihan found several factors to be significant in the optimization of the method.23

List six of these factors, describe in detail the physical basis for each factor, and discuss why each is important.

(b) These workers describe an a priori method for determining the limit of detection (LOD). Compare and contrast this method with the method described in Section 1E-2. How does this method improve on the method as defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) in the ˝Orange Book˝? See http://www.iupac.org/publications/analytical_compendium/. Describe any disadvantages of the method.

(c) The investigations described by Cabon and Bihan treated the data using least-squares polynomial smoothing (see Section 5C-2) prior to determining the LOD. Describe precisely how the data were

smoothed. What experimental variable was optimized in the smoothing procedure? How was the width of the smoothing window defined? What effect, if any, did the smoothing procedure have on the LOD as determined by these workers? What effect did smoothing have on the determination of the integration window for the instrumental signal?

(d) These workers compared the determination of the signal magnitude by integration and by measuring

peak signals. What was the outcome of this comparison? Explain why these results were obtained by

using your understanding of signal-to-noise enhancement procedures.

(e) How were instrument signals integrated? What alternative numerical procedures are available for integrating

digital signals? What procedural variable or variables influenced the quality of the integrated signal data? Describe the effect of signal integration on working curves for Pb.

(f) What is dosing volume, and what effect did it appear to have on the quality of the results in these procedures?

Why is source modulation used in atomic absorption spectroscopy?

Why is atomic emission more sensitive to flame instability than atomic absorption or fluorescence?

Why is an electrothermal atomizer more sensitive than a flame atomizer?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free