Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Estimate the thickness of the polystyrene film that yielded the spectrum shown in Figure 16-1.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The thickness of the film is 7.9×10-3cm.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given information  

Determine the thickness of the polystyrene film.

02

Step 2. Explanation

The thickness of the polystyrene film is given as:
b=ΔN2v¯1-v¯2(I)

Where,

ΔN:Number of the interference fringes between the two wavelengths is ,

v¯1:Wave number of the lower absorption bond is and

v¯2:Wave number of the higher absorption bond.

Refer the fig 16-1

Get the number of the interference fringes between the two wavelengths as 12.64.

Wavenumber for the lower absorption bond as 2800 cm-1and for the higher absorption bond as 2000 cm-1.

Substitute these values in the equation, we get

b=12.6422800cm-1-2000cm-1=12.641600cm-1=7.9×10-3cm

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why are quantitative analytical methods based on NIR radiation often more precise and accurate than methods based on mid-IR radiation?

Discuss the origins of photoacoustic IR spectra. What are the usual types of samples for photoacoustic measurements?

The spectrum in Figure 17-20 is that of a high-boiling-point liquid having the empirical formula C9H10O. Identify the compound as closely as possible.

Cyclohexanone exhibits its strongest IR absorption band at 5.86 μm, and at this wavelength there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration.
(a) Identify the part of the molecule responsible for the absorbance at this wavelength.
(b) Suggest a solvent that would be suitable for a quantitative analysis of cyclohexanone at this wavelength.
(c) A solution of cyclohexanone (4.0 mg/mL) in the solvent selected in part (b) exhibits a blank-corrected absorbance of 0.800 in a cell with a path length of 0.025 mm. What is the detection limit for this compound under these conditions if the noise associated with the spectrum of the solvent is 0.001 absorbance units?

(a) Consider an ATR experiment with a sample having a refractive index of 1.03 at 2000 cm-1. The ATR crystal was AgCl with a refractive index of 2.00 at this wavelength. For an angle of incidence of 45°, what is the effective penetration depth of the evanescent wave? How would the penetration depth change if the angle were changed to 60°?
(b) For the same experiment in part (a) and a 60° incidence angle, find the penetration depths for sample refractive indexes varying from 1.00 to 1.70 in steps of 0.10. Plot penetration depth as a function of refractive index. Determine the refractive index for which the penetration depth becomes zero. What happens at this point?
(c) For a sample with a refractive index of 1.37 at 2000 cm-1 and an incidence angle of 45°, plot the penetration depth versus the ATR crystal refractive index. Vary the crystal refractive index over the range of 2.00 to 4.00 in steps of 0.25. Which crystal, AgCl (nc5 2.00) or Ge (nc 5 4.00), gives the smaller penetration depth? Why?
(d) An aqueous solution with a refractive index of 1.003 is measured with an ATR crystal with a refractive index of 2.8. The incidence angle is 45°. What is the effective penetration depth at 3000 cm-1, 2000 cm-1, and 1000 cm-1? Is absorption by the aqueous solvent as much of a problem in ATR as in normal IR absorption measurements? Why or why not?
(e) Work by S. Ekgasit and H. Ishida (S. Ekgasit and H. Ishida, Appl. Spectrosc., 1996, 50, 1187; Appl. Spectrosc., 1997, 51, 461) describes a new method to obtain a depth profile of a sample surface using ATR spectroscopy. Describe the principles of this new approach. Why are spectra taken with different degrees of polarization? What is the complex index of refraction?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free