Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Many surface reactions require the adsorption of two or more different gases. For the case of two gases, assuming that the adsorption of a gas simply limits the number of surface sites available for adsorption, derive expressions for the fractional coverage of each gas.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The expressions for the fractional coverage of two gases A and B using the Langmuir isotherm model are: Fractional coverage of gas A, \(\theta_A\) = \(\frac{K_AP_A}{1+K_AP_A+K_BP_B}\) Fractional coverage of gas B, \(\theta_B\) = \(\frac{K_BP_B}{1+K_AP_A+K_BP_B}\)

Step by step solution

01

Recall the Langmuir Isotherm model

The Langmuir isotherm model is given as: Fractional Coverage (θ) = \(\frac{KP}{1+KP}\) Where θ is the fractional coverage, K is the adsorption equilibrium constant, and P is the pressure of the gas.
02

Define the variables for the two gases

Let's represent the fractional coverage of gas A and gas B as \(\theta_A\) and \(\theta_B\), respectively. Let's also represent the adsorption equilibrium constants for A and B as \(K_A\) and \(K_B\), and the pressures of A and B as \(P_A\) and \(P_B\).
03

Set up the equations for fractional coverage

Using the Langmuir isotherm model, we can set up the equations for the fractional coverage for the two gases: \[\theta_A = \frac{K_AP_A}{1+K_AP_A+K_BP_B}\] \[\theta_B = \frac{K_BP_B}{1+K_AP_A+K_BP_B}\] Where we have considered the fact that the denominator accounts for the total number of surface sites.
04

Expressions for fractional coverage

Finally, we have derived the expressions for the fractional coverage of each gas in terms of their respective adsorption equilibrium constants and pressures: Fractional coverage of gas A, \(\theta_A\) = \(\frac{K_AP_A}{1+K_AP_A+K_BP_B}\) Fractional coverage of gas B, \(\theta_B\) = \(\frac{K_BP_B}{1+K_AP_A+K_BP_B}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Adsorption Equilibrium Constant
The adsorption equilibrium constant, commonly denoted as 'K' in the context of the Langmuir Isotherm model, plays a crucial role in understanding how a gas interacts with a surface. It is essentially a measure of how readily gas molecules adsorb onto a surface at a given pressure. A higher value of K indicates a stronger affinity between the gas molecules and the surface, leading to more adsorption. Conversely, a lower K value suggests that the gas molecules prefer to remain in the gaseous phase rather than being adsorbed.

When we consider two different gases competing for the same surface sites, as in our exercise, each gas will have its own unique adsorption equilibrium constant, labeled as \(K_A\) and \(K_B\) respectively. These constants will determine to what extent each gas is adsorbed when both are present.
Fractional Coverage
Fractional coverage, denoted by \(\theta\), is a term that describes the proportion of available adsorption sites on a surface that are occupied by a specific gas. This concept is integral in quantifying the extent of adsorption of gas molecules on a surface. Mathematically, fractional coverage ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates no adsorption and 1 signifies that all available sites are occupied by the gas in question.

In our given problem, the Langmuir Isotherm model provides the formula to calculate the fractional coverage for individual gases, considering that each gas affects the adsorption of the other. Therefore, the availability of surface sites for gas A is influenced by the presence of gas B, and vice versa. The model accounts for this interaction in the denominator of the expressions for \(\theta_A\) and \(\theta_B\), encapsulating the dynamic balance between both gases competing for adsorption sites.
Surface Reactions
Understanding surface reactions is vital in many industrial processes, such as catalysis, where the reaction occurs on the catalyst's surface. These reactions can be influenced by the presence and adsorption of gases on the surface. In the context of the Langmuir Isotherm model, which we’ve used to solve our exercise problem, adsorption is a precursor to surface reactions. The model assumes that for a reaction to proceed, reactant molecules must first adsorb onto specific sites on the surface.

This adsorption is reversible and leads to an equilibrium state described by the fractional coverage and the adsorption equilibrium constants. The interplay between the amount of gas A (\(\theta_A\)) and gas B (\(\theta_B\)) adsorbed on the surface directly affects the rate and direction of the surface reactions between these gases. For instance, if one gas dominates the surface coverage, it will likely alter the pathway and speed at which the surface reaction proceeds.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Reciprocal plots provide a relatively straightforward way to determine if an enzyme demonstrates Michaelis-Menten kinetics and to determine the corresponding kinetic parameters. However, the slope determined from these plots can require significant extrapolation to regions corresponding to low substrate concentrations. An alternative to the reciprocal plot is the Eadie- Hofstee plot in which the reaction rate is plotted versus the rate divided by the substrate concentration and the data are fit to a straight line. a. Beginning with the general expression for the reaction rate given by the Michaelis-Menten mechanism: \\[ R_{0}=\frac{R_{\max }[\mathrm{S}]_{0}}{[\mathrm{S}]_{0}+K_{m}} \\] rearrange this equation to construct the following expression, which is the basis for the Eadie-Hofstee plot: \\[ R_{0}=R_{\max }-K_{m}\left(\frac{R_{0}}{[S]_{0}}\right) \\] b. Using an Eadie-Hofstee plot, determine \(R_{\max }\) and \(K_{m}\) for hydrolysis of sugar by the enzyme invertase using the following data: $$\begin{array}{cc} \text { [Sucrose ] }_{\mathbf{0}}(\mathbf{M}) & \mathbf{R}_{\mathbf{0}}\left(\mathbf{M} \mathbf{~ s}^{-\mathbf{1}}\right) \\ \hline 0.029 & 0.182 \\ 0.059 & 0.266 \\ 0.088 & 0.310 \\ 0.117 & 0.330 \\ 0.175 & 0.362 \\ 0.234 & 0.361 \end{array}$$

Consider the following mechanism for ozone thermal decomposition: \\[ \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{O}_{3}(g) \stackrel{k_{1}}{\rightleftharpoons} \mathrm{O}_{2}(g)+\mathrm{O}(g) \\ \mathrm{O}_{3}(g)+\mathrm{O}(g) \stackrel{k_{2}}{\longrightarrow} 2 \mathrm{O}_{2}(g) \end{array} \\] a. Derive the rate law expression for the loss of \(\mathrm{O}_{3}(g)\) b. Under what conditions will the rate law expression for \(\mathrm{O}_{3}(g)\) decomposition be first order with respect to \(\mathrm{O}_{3}(g) ?\)

(Challenging) Cubic autocatalytic steps are important in a reaction mechanism referred to as the "brusselator" (named in honor of the research group in Brussels that initially discovered this mechanism): $$\begin{array}{l} \mathrm{A} \stackrel{k_{1}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{X} \\ 2 \mathrm{X}+\mathrm{Y} \stackrel{k_{2}}{\longrightarrow} 3 \mathrm{X} \\ \mathrm{B}+\mathrm{X} \stackrel{k_{3}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{Y}+\mathrm{C} \\\ \mathrm{X} \stackrel{k_{4}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{D} \end{array}$$ If \([\mathrm{A}]\) and \([\mathrm{B}]\) are held constant, this mechanism demonstrates interesting oscillatory behavior that we will explore in this problem. a. Identify the autocatalytic species in this mechanism. b. Write down the differential rate expressions for \([\mathrm{X}]\) and \([\mathrm{Y}]\) c. Using these differential rate expressions, employ Euler's method (Section 35.6 ) to calculate \([\mathrm{X}]\) and \([\mathrm{Y}]\) versus time under the conditions \(\mathrm{k}_{1}=1.2 \mathrm{s}^{-1}, \mathrm{k}_{2}=0.5 \mathrm{M}^{-2} \mathrm{s}^{-1}, \mathrm{k}_{3}=\) \(3.0 \mathrm{M}^{-1} \mathrm{s}^{-1}, \mathrm{k}_{4}=1.2 \mathrm{s}^{-1},\) and \([\mathrm{A}]_{0}=[\mathrm{B}]_{0}=1 \mathrm{M} .\) Begin with \([\mathrm{X}]_{0}=0.5 \mathrm{M}\) and \([\mathrm{Y}]_{0}=0.1 \mathrm{M} .\) A plot of \([\mathrm{Y}]\) versus \([\mathrm{X}]\) should look like the top panel in the following figure. d. Perform a second calculation identical to that in part (c), but with \([\mathrm{X}]_{0}=3.0 \mathrm{M}\) and \([\mathrm{Y}]_{0}=3.0 \mathrm{M} .\) A plot of \([\mathrm{Y}]\) versus \([\mathrm{X}]\) should look like the bottom panel in the following figure. e. Compare the left and bottom panels in the following figure. Notice that the starting conditions for the reaction are different (indicated by the black spot). What DO the figures indicate regarding the oscillatory state the system evolves to?

If \(\tau_{f}=1 \times 10^{-10} \mathrm{s}\) and \(k_{i c}=5 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{s}^{-1},\) what is \(\phi_{f} ?\) Assume that the rate constants for intersystem crossing and quenching are sufficiently small that these processes can be neglected.

DNA microarrays or "chips" first appeared on the market in \(1996 .\) These chips are divided into square patches, with each patch having strands of DNA of the same sequence attached to a substrate. The patches are differentiated by differences in the DNA sequence. One can introduce DNA or mRNA of unknown sequence to the chip and monitor to which patches the introduced strands bind. This technique has a wide variety of applications in genome mapping and other areas. Modeling the chip as a surface with binding sites, and modeling the attachment of DNA to a patch using the Langmuir model, what is the required difference in the Gibbs energy of binding needed to modify the fractional coverage on a given patch from 0.90 to 0.10 for two different DNA strands at the same concentration at \(298 \mathrm{K} ?\) In performing this calculation replace pressure (P) with concentration (c) in the fractionalcoverage expression. Also, recall that \(K=\exp (-\Delta G / R T)\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free