Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Determine the expression for fractional coverage as a function of pressure for the dissociative adsorption mechanism described in the text in which adsorption is accompanied by dissociation:$$R_{2}(g)+2 M(\text {surface}) \stackrel{k_{a}}{\rightleftharpoons_{k}} 2 R M(\text {surface})$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The expression for the fractional coverage (θ) as a function of pressure (P) for the dissociative adsorption mechanism is: \[ θ = 1 - \frac{k}{k_a\cdot P + k} \]

Step by step solution

01

Write down the rate equations for adsorption and desorption

We can represent the rate of adsorption (Rate_ads) and desorption (Rate_des) as follows: Rate_ads = \(k_a\cdot P \cdot (1-θ)^2\) Rate_des = \(k\cdot θ^2\) Here, (1-θ) represents the fraction of empty sites, and θ represents the fraction of occupied sites. P is the pressure.
02

Write down the expressions for dynamic equilibrium

At equilibrium, the rate of adsorption is equal to the rate of desorption, and we can write: \(k_a\cdot P\cdot (1-θ)^2 = k\cdot θ^2\)
03

Solve for θ

Now, we will solve for θ, which is the fractional coverage: \(\frac{k_a\cdot P}{k} = \frac{θ^2}{(1-θ)^2}\) From this equation, we can rearrange to get: \( θ^2 = \frac{k_a\cdot P}{k} (1-θ)^2 \) Now, we will expand the equation: \[ θ^2 = \frac{k_a\cdot P}{k} (1 - 2θ + θ^2) \] Now, we can isolate θ of: \[ θ = 1 - \frac{k}{k_a\cdot P + k} \]
04

Write the final expression for fractional coverage

The expression for the fractional coverage (θ) as a function of pressure (P) for the dissociative adsorption mechanism is: \[ θ = 1 - \frac{k}{k_a\cdot P + k} \]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Adsorption and Desorption Rates
The phenomenon of adsorption involves the attachment of particles, typically atoms, molecules, or ions, from a gas, liquid, or dissolved solid onto a surface. This process is pivotal in many industrial and environmental systems, where surface reactions are a critical component. In the case of dissociative adsorption, molecules split and then adsorb onto the surface. Conversely, desorption is the release of these adsorbed particles back into the surrounding phase.

The rates at which these two processes occur have profound implications for the state of the system. The adsorption rate, commonly denoted as Rate_ads, depends on the adsorption coefficient (\( k_a \)), the pressure of the surrounding gas (P), and the availability of empty sites on the surface, expressed as (\(1 - \theta \))^2 where \theta is the fractional coverage. Hence the rate equation for adsorption becomes Rate_ads = \(k_a\text{·}P\text{·}(1-\theta)^2\). On the flip side, the desorption rate, or Rate_des, is influenced by the desorption coefficient (k) and the fraction of sites already occupied by adsorbed particles (\theta^2), leading to Rate_des = \(k\text{·}\theta^2\).
Dynamic Equilibrium
Dynamic equilibrium in the context of adsorption is the state where the rates of adsorption and desorption are equal, meaning that as many particles are attaching to the surface as are leaving it. With dissociative adsorption, the equilibrium is established between the gas-phase reactants and the species adsorbed on the surface.

When the system reaches this state of balance, no net change in concentration of reactants and products occurs, although individual molecules may still be in flux. Mathematically, at equilibrium, the equation \(k_a\text{·}P\text{·}(1-\theta)^2 = k\text{·}\theta^2\) holds true. This equality allows for the derivation of an expression for fractional coverage, which describes the proportion of surface sites occupied by adsorbed species.
Solving for Fractional Coverage
Fractional coverage (\theta) is a crucial parameter representing the fraction of the surface sites that are occupied by adsorbed species. Solving for \theta gives insight into how surface coverage changes with pressure and is fundamental for understanding the behavior of adsorbed species.

By equating the rate equations - Rate_ads and Rate_des - and rearranging, we obtain an equation that relates \theta to the pressure and the rate constants (\theta = 1 - \(\frac{k}{k_a\text{·}P + k}\)). This derivation follows from considering that at equilibrium, the amount of adsorbate on the surface remains constant over time, allowing this steady-state assumption to simplify the kinetic analysis. The derived expression allows predictions of the system behavior under varying pressures and is an essential tool for designing and characterizing adsorption systems.
Chemical Kinetics
Chemical kinetics is the study of the speed or rate at which chemical reactions proceed and the factors affecting these rates. In reactions involving adsorption, such as the dissociative adsorption of gas onto a surface, insights from kinetics are crucial for understanding both the rates of adsorption/desorption and the mechanisms controlling these processes.

The rate constants (\( k_a \) and k) in the rate equations reflect the kinetic properties of the system and are influenced by factors like temperature, surface area, and the nature of the adsorbate and surface. In essence, kinetics helps explain how quickly equilibrium is reached and how varying conditions affect the adsorption process. The accurate quantification and understanding of these rate constants are essential for controlling chemical reactions, optimizing industrial processes, and understanding natural phenomena.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPases) are a general class of enzymes that are involved in a variety of disease processes including diabetes and obesity. In a study by Z.-Y. Zhang and coworkers [J. Medicinal Chemistry 43 \((2000): 146]\) computational techniques were used to identify potential competitive inhibitors of a specific PTPase known as PTP1B. The structure of one of the identified potential competitive inhibitors is shown here: The reaction rate was determined in the presence and absence of inhibitor \(I\) and revealed the following initial reaction rates as a function of substrate concentration: $$\begin{array}{ccc} & \mathbf{R}_{0}\left(\boldsymbol{\mu} \mathbf{M} \mathbf{~} \mathbf{s}^{-\mathbf{1}}\right) \\ {[\mathbf{S}](\boldsymbol{\mu} \mathbf{M})} & \mathbf{R}_{0}\left(\boldsymbol{\mu} \mathbf{M} \mathbf{~} \mathbf{s}^{-1}\right),[\boldsymbol{I}]=\mathbf{0} & {\left[\begin{array}{cc} \boldsymbol{I} & =\mathbf{2 0 0} \boldsymbol{\mu} \mathbf{M} \end{array}\right]} \\ \hline 0.299 & 0.071 & 0.018 \\ 0.500 & 0.100 & 0.030 \\ 0.820 & 0.143 & 0.042 \\ 1.22 & 0.250 & 0.070 \\ 1.75 & 0.286 & 0.105 \\ 2.85 & 0.333 & 0.159 \\ 5.00 & 0.400 & 0.200 \\ 5.88 & 0.500 & 0.250 \end{array}$$ a. Determine \(K_{m}\) and \(R_{\max }\) for PTP1B. b. Demonstrate that the inhibition is competitive, and determine \(K_{i}\)

Another type of autocatalytic reaction is referred to as cubic autocatalytic corresponding to the following elementary process: \\[ A+2 B \rightarrow 3 B \\] Write the rate law expression for this elementary process. What would you expect the corresponding differential rate expression in terms of \(\xi(\) the coefficient of reaction advancement) to be?

An experiment is performed in which the rate constant for electron transfer is measured as a function of dis- tance by attaching an electron donor and acceptor to pieces of DNA of varying length. The measured rate constant for electron transfer as a function of separation distance is as follows: $$\begin{array}{lcccc} \boldsymbol{k}_{e x p}\left(\mathbf{s}^{-1}\right) & 2.10 \times 10^{8} & 2.01 \times 10^{7} & 2.07 \times 10^{5} & 204 \\ \text { Distance (Á) } & 14 & 17 & 23 & 32 \end{array}$$ a. Determine the value for \(\beta\) that defines the dependence of the electron transfer rate constant on separation distance. b. It has been proposed that DNA can serve as an electron \(" \pi\) -way" facilitating electron transfer over long distances. Using the rate constant at 17 Á presented in the table, what value of \(\beta\) would result in the rate of electron transfer decreasing by only a factor of 10 at a separation distance of \(23 \AA ?\)

If \(10 \%\) of the energy of a \(100 .\) W incandescent bulb is in the form of visible light having an average wavelength of \(600 .\) nm, how many photons are emitted per second from the light bulb?

For the reaction \(\mathrm{I}^{-}(a q)+\mathrm{OCl}^{-}(a q) \rightleftharpoons\) \(\mathrm{OI}^{-}(a q)+\mathrm{Cl}^{-}(a q)\) occurring in aqueous solution, the following mechanism has been proposed: \\[ \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{OCl}^{-}(a q)+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(l) \quad \frac{k_{1}}{\overrightarrow{k_{-1}}} \quad \mathrm{HOCl}(a q)+\mathrm{OH}^{-}(a q) \\ \mathrm{I}(a q)+\mathrm{HOCl}(a q) \stackrel{k_{2}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{HOI}(a q)+\mathrm{Cl}^{-}(a q) \\ \mathrm{HOI}(a q)+\mathrm{OH}^{-}(a q) \stackrel{k_{3}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(l)+\mathrm{OI}^{-}(a q) \end{array} \\] a. Derive the rate law expression for this reaction based on this mechanism. (Hint: \(\left[\mathrm{OH}^{-}\right]\) should appear in the rate law. b. The initial rate of reaction was studied as a function of concentration by Chia and Connick [J. Physical Chemistry \(63(1959): 1518]\), and the following data were obtained: $$\begin{array}{lccc} & & & \text { Initial Rate } \\ {\left[\mathbf{I}^{-}\right]_{0}(\mathbf{M})} & {\left[\mathbf{O C l}^{-}\right]_{0}(\mathbf{M})} & {\left[\mathbf{O H}^{-}\right]_{0}(\mathbf{M})} & \left(\mathbf{M} \mathrm{s}^{-1}\right) \\ \hline 2.0 \times 10^{-3} & 1.5 \times 10^{-3} & 1.00 & 1.8 \times 10^{-4} \\ 4.0 \times 10^{-3} & 1.5 \times 10^{-3} & 1.00 & 3.6 \times 10^{-4} \\ 2.0 \times 10^{-3} & 3.0 \times 10^{-3} & 2.00 & 1.8 \times 10^{-4} \\ 4.0 \times 10^{-3} & 3.0 \times 10^{-3} & 1.00 & 7.2 \times 10^{-4} \end{array}$$ Is the predicted rate law expression derived from the mechanism consistent with these data?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free