Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the collision-induced dissociation of \(\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{5}(g)\) via the following mechanism: \\[ \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{5}(g)+\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{5}(g) \frac{k_{1}}{\overline{k_{-1}}} \mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{5}(g)^{*}+\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{5}(g) \\ \mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{5}(g) * \stackrel{k_{2}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{NO}_{2}(g)+\mathrm{NO}_{3}(g) \end{array} \\] The asterisk in the first reaction indicates that the reactan is activated through collision. Experimentally it is found that the reaction can be either first or second order in \(\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{5}(g)\) depending on the concentration of this species. Derive a rate law expression for this reaction consistent with this observation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The rate law expression for the given reaction mechanism of N2O5 dissociation can be derived using the steady-state approximation for activated N2O5, and is given by: \(\textbf{Rate} = r_2 = k_2\left(\frac{k_1 [N2O5]^2}{(k_{-1} [N2O5]+k_2)}\right)\) This expression is consistent with the observation that the reaction can be either first or second order in N2O5, depending on its concentration.

Step by step solution

01

Elementary Reaction 1:

\(r_1 = k_1 [N2O5]^2 - k_{-1} [N2O5][N2O5^*]\)
02

Elementary Reaction 2:

\(r_2 = k_2[N2O5^*]\) Where: - \(r_1\) is the rate of elementary reaction 1 - \(r_2\) is the rate of elementary reaction 2 - \(k_1\) and \(k_{-1}\) are the forward and reverse rate constants for reaction 1 - \(k_2\) is the rate constant for reaction 2 - [N2O5] is the concentration of N2O5 - [N2O5^*] is the concentration of activated N2O5 #Step 2: Obtain the steady-state approximation for activated N2O5# Since the activated N2O5 is an unstable intermediate, it is reasonable to assume that its concentration stays constant during the reaction. This is known as the steady-state approximation:
03

Steady-state approximation:

\(\frac{d[N2O5^*]}{dt} \approx 0\) Applying the steady-state approximation, we can write:
04

Steady-state equation:

\(k_1 [N2O5]^2 - k_{-1} [N2O5][N2O5^*] = k_2[N2O5^*]\) #Step 3: Solve for activated N2O5 concentration# Rearrange the steady-state equation to get the concentration of activated N2O5 in terms of N2O5 concentration and rate constants:
05

Expression for activated N2O5 concentration:

\([N2O5^*] = \frac{k_1 [N2O5]^2}{(k_{-1} [N2O5] + k_2)}\) #Step 4: Write the overall rate law expression# Now, to obtain the overall rate law expression for the reaction, substitute the expression for [N2O5^*] (from step 3) into the rate expression for elementary reaction 2:
06

Rate law expression:

\(\textbf{Rate} = r_2 = k_2\left(\frac{k_1 [N2O5]^2}{(k_{-1} [N2O5]+k_2)}\right)\) This rate law expression is consistent with the observation that the reaction can be either first or second order in N2O5 depending on its concentration, as it contains both linear and quadratic concentration terms.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Steady-State Approximation
In chemical kinetics, the steady-state approximation is a valuable concept for understanding how reactions proceed, especially when intermediates are involved. This approximation assumes that the concentration of certain reactive intermediates, like the activated \(2O5^*\), remains relatively constant during the course of the reaction.

Why is this assumption helpful? Well, intermediates are often unstable and quickly convert into products or revert to reactants. By assuming their concentration doesn't change significantly, it simplifies the math required to describe complex reactions.

For this specific reaction, we utilized the steady-state approximation by setting \(\frac{d[N2O5^*]}{dt} \approx 0\) indicating the change in concentration of \([N2O5^*]\) over time is negligible. Applying this concept allows us to effectively analyze and derive the rate law expression.
Rate Law Expression
A rate law expression helps us understand how the rate of a reaction depends on the concentration of its reactants. It's derived by integrating different components of the reaction such as rate constants and concentrations of the reactants or intermediates.

In our process, the derived rate law expression was \(\textbf{Rate} = k_2\left(\frac{k_1 [N2O5]^2}{(k_{-1} [N2O5]+k_2)}\right)\). This particular expression reflects how the reaction rate depends on the concentration of \(2O5\), taking into account the forward and reverse paths of the activated complex.

Such an expression is crucial because it shows the relationship between the concentration of reactants and the speed of the reaction, highlighting the dependency on both quadratic and linear terms. It also illustrates how the reaction order can appear as first or second order depending on specific scenarios such as low or high concentrations of \(2O5\).
Elementary Reactions
An elementary reaction is a simple step within a complex reaction mechanism, describing a basic transformation of reactants to products. Each elementary step has its own unique rate law expression that relates to the specific concentrations of the reactants involved in that step.

For the dissociation of \(2O5\), we consider two elementary reactions:
  • Elementary Reaction 1: \(r_1 = k_1 [N2O5]^2 - k_{-1} [N2O5][N2O5^*]\)
  • Elementary Reaction 2: \(r_2 = k_2[N2O5^*]\)
These steps illustrate the transformation through an activated intermediate \(N2O5^*\), capturing both the forward and reverse directions.

Understanding elementary reactions is essential for unraveling how a mechanism works as they set the foundation for determining overall reaction rates, facilitating a clearer view on how the entire process unfolds.
Reaction Order
Reaction order is a critical aspect of chemical kinetics, indicating the power to which the concentration of a reactant is raised in the rate law expression. It helps predict how changes in reactant concentrations will affect the reaction rate.

For the given reaction involving \(2O5\), the experimentally observed reaction order is either first or second order. This variability in reaction order depends on the concentration of \(2O5\). When the concentration is low, it behaves as a first-order reaction, whereas at larger concentrations, the rate appears second order.

This change in reaction order is effectively explained by the derived rate law, which includes both linear and quadratic terms of \([N2O5]\). Understanding reaction order helps in predicting and controlling the rate of chemical reactions in practical applications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Kermack-McKendrick model was developed to explain the rapid rise and fall in the number of infected people during epidemics. This model involves the interaction of susceptible (S), infected (I), and recovered (R) people through the following mechanism: \\[ \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{S}+\mathrm{I} \stackrel{k_{1}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{I}+\mathrm{I} \\\ \mathrm{I} \stackrel{k_{2}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{R} \end{array} \\] a. Write down the differential rate expressions for \(S,\) I, and \(R\) b. The key quantity in this mechanism is called the epidemiological threshold defined as the ratio of \([\mathrm{S}] k_{1} / k_{2}\). When this ratio is greater than 1 the epidemic will spread; however, when the threshold is less than 1 the epidemic will die out. Based on the mechanism, explain why this behavior is observed.

DNA microarrays or "chips" first appeared on the market in \(1996 .\) These chips are divided into square patches, with each patch having strands of DNA of the same sequence attached to a substrate. The patches are differentiated by differences in the DNA sequence. One can introduce DNA or mRNA of unknown sequence to the chip and monitor to which patches the introduced strands bind. This technique has a wide variety of applications in genome mapping and other areas. Modeling the chip as a surface with binding sites, and modeling the attachment of DNA to a patch using the Langmuir model, what is the required difference in the Gibbs energy of binding needed to modify the fractional coverage on a given patch from 0.90 to 0.10 for two different DNA strands at the same concentration at \(298 \mathrm{K} ?\) In performing this calculation replace pressure (P) with concentration (c) in the fractionalcoverage expression. Also, recall that \(K=\exp (-\Delta G / R T)\)

In the discussion of the Lindemann mechanism, it was assumed that the rate of activation by collision with another reactant molecule \(A\) was the same as collision with a nonreactant molecule M such as a buffer gas. What if the rates of activation for these two processes are different? In this case, the mechanism becomes \\[ \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{A}+\mathrm{M} \quad \underbrace{k_{1}}{=} \mathrm{A}^{*}+\mathrm{M} \\\ \mathrm{A}+\mathrm{A} \stackrel{k_{-1}}{=} \mathrm{k}_{-2} \\ \mathrm{A}^{*} \stackrel{\mathrm{k}_{3}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{P} \end{array} \\] a. Demonstrate that the rate law expression for this mechanism is \\[ R=\frac{k_{3}\left(k_{1}[\mathrm{A}][\mathrm{M}]+k_{2}[\mathrm{A}]^{2}\right)}{k_{-1}[\mathrm{M}]+k_{-2}[\mathrm{A}]+k_{-3}} \\] b. Does this rate law reduce to the expected form when \([\mathrm{M}]=0 ?\)

Consider the formation of double-stranded (DS) DNA from two complementary single strands (S and S') through the following mechanism involving an intermediate helix (IH): \\[ \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{S}+\mathrm{S}^{\prime} \frac{k_{1}}{\mathrm{k}_{-1}} \mathrm{IH} \\ \mathrm{IH} \stackrel{k_{2}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{DS} \end{array} \\] a. Derive the rate law expression for this reaction employing the preequilibrium approximation. b. What is the corresponding rate-law expression for the reaction employing the steady state approximation for the intermediate IH?

A central issue in the design of aircraft is improving the lift of aircraft wings. To assist in the design of more efficient wings, wind-tunnel tests are performed in which the pressures at various parts of the wing are measured generally using only a few localized pressure sensors. Recently, pressure- sensitive paints have been developed to provide a more detailed view of wing pressure. In these paints, a luminescent molecule is dispersed into an oxygen- permeable paint and the aircraft wing is painted. The wing is placed into an airfoil, and luminescence from the paint is measured. The variation in \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) pressure is measured by monitoring the luminescence intensity, with lower intensity demonstrating areas of higher \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) pressure due to quenching. a. The use of platinum octaethylporphyrin (PtOEP) as an oxygen sensor in pressure-sensitive paints was described by Gouterman and coworkers [Review of Scientific Instruments \(61(1990): 3340] .\) In this work, the following relationship between luminescence intensity and pressure was derived: \(I_{0} / I=A+B\left(P / P_{0}\right),\) where \(I_{0}\) is the fluorescence intensity at ambient pressure \(P_{0},\) and \(I\) is the fluorescence intensity at an arbitrary pressure \(P .\) Determine coefficients \(A\) and \(B\) in the preceding expression using the Stern-Volmer equation: \(k_{\text {total}}=1 / \tau_{l}=k_{l}+k_{q}[Q] .\) In this equation \(\tau_{l}\) is the luminescence lifetime, \(k_{l}\) is the luminescent rate constant, and \(k_{q}\) is the quenching rate constant. In addition, the luminescent intensity ratio is equal to the ratio of luminescence quantum yields at ambient pressure \(\Phi_{0}\) and an arbitrary pressure \(\Phi:\) \\[ \Phi_{0} / \Phi=I_{0} / I \\] b. Using the following calibration data of the intensity ratio versus pressure observed for PtOEP, determine \(A\) and \(B\) : $$\begin{array}{cccc} I_{0} / I & P / P_{0} & I_{0} / I & P / P_{0} \\ \hline 1.0 & 1.0 & 0.65 & 0.46 \\ 0.9 & 0.86 & 0.61 & 0.40 \\ 0.87 & 0.80 & 0.55 & 0.34 \\ 0.83 & 0.75 & 0.50 & 0.28 \\ 0.77 & 0.65 & 0.46 & 0.20 \\ 0.70 & 0.53 & 0.35 & 0.10 \end{array}$$ c. \(A t\) an ambient pressure of 1 atm, \(I_{0}=50,000\) (arbitrary units \()\) and 40,000 at the front and back of the wing. The wind tunnel is turned on to a speed of Mach \(0.36,\) and the measured luminescence intensity is 65,000 and 45,000 at the respective locations. What is the pressure differential between the front and back of the wing?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free