Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Section 11.5, we saw that ethers, such as diethyl ether and tetrahydrofuran, are quite resistant to the action of dilute acids and require hot concentrated HI or HBr for cleavage. However, acetals in which two ether groups are linked to the same carbon undergo hydrolysis readily, even in dilute aqueous acid. How do you account for this marked difference in chemical reactivity toward dilute aqueous acid between ethers and acetals?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Explain the difference in reactivity between ethers and acetals towards dilute aqueous acid. Answer: The difference in reactivity between ethers and acetals towards dilute aqueous acid lies in their molecular structures. Ethers have a strong and stable C-O bond that cannot be easily cleaved by dilute acids due to resonance stabilization. Acetals, however, have two ether groups connected to a single carbon, which upon protonation forms an unstable intermediate that can readily undergo hydrolysis. This is why acetals are more reactive than ethers towards dilute aqueous acid.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the molecular structure of ethers and acetals.

Ethers have the general formula R-O-R', where R and R' are alkyl or aryl groups. Acetals, on the other hand, have the general formula R-C(OR')2, where R and R' can be alkyl or aryl groups. The key difference is that in acetals, two ether groups are connected to the same carbon atom.
02

Understand the reactivity of ethers towards acids.

Ethers are relatively unreactive with dilute aqueous acid. This is mainly because the oxygen atom in ethers cannot be protonated easily by the acid due to resonance stabilization of the lone pair electrons. Moreover, the C-O bond in ethers is generally strong and not susceptible to cleavage.
03

Understand the reactivity of acetals towards acids.

Acetals, on the other hand, are much more susceptible to hydrolysis by dilute aqueous acid. This is due to the presence of two ether groups linked to a single carbon atom. When protonated by the acid, a positively charged intermediate species is formed that eventually undergoes cleavage of one of the C-O bonds. The resulting carbocation can then be attacked by water, leading to the eventual hydrolysis of the acetal.
04

Summary of the difference in reactivity.

The key difference in reactivity between ethers and acetals towards dilute aqueous acid lies in their molecular structures. While ethers have a strong and stable C-O bond that cannot be easily cleaved by dilute acids, acetals have two ether groups connected to a single carbon, which, upon protonation, leads to the formation of an unstable intermediate that can readily undergo hydrolysis. This explains the marked difference in chemical reactivity between ethers and acetals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The base-promoted rearrangement of an \(\alpha\)-haloketone to a carboxylic acid, known as the Favorskii rearrangement, is illustrated by the conversion of 2 -chlorocyclohexanone to cyclopentanecarboxylic acid. It is proposed that \(\mathrm{NaOH}\) first converts the \(\alpha\)-haloketone to the substituted cyclopropanone shown in brackets and then to the sodium salt of cyclopentanecarboxylic acid. (a) Propose a mechanism for base-promoted conversion of 2 -chlorocyclohexanone to the proposed intermediate. (b) Propose a mechanism for base-promoted conversion of the proposed intermediate to sodium cyclopentanecarboxylate.

Both 1,2 -diols and 1,3-diols can be protected by treatment with 2 -methoxypropene according to the following reaction. (a) Propose a mechanism for the formation of this protected diol. (b) Suggest an experimental procedure by which this protecting group can be removed to regenerate the unprotected diol.

It is possible to generate sulfur ylides in a manner similar to that used to produce phosphonium ylides. For example, treating a sulfonium salt with a strong base gives the sulfur ylide. Figure can`t copy Sulfur ylides react with ketones to give epoxides. Suggest a mechanism for this reaction. Figure can`t copy

Using your reaction roadmaps as a guide, show how to convert ethylene into 2 -methyl1,3-dioxolane. You must use ethylene as the source of all carbon atoms in the target molecule. Show all reagents and all molecules synthesized along the way.

Draw a structural formula for the product formed by treating butanal with each reagent. (a) \(\mathrm{LiAlH}_{4}\) followed by \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\) (b) \(\mathrm{NaBH}_{4}\) in \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OH} / \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\) (c) \(\mathrm{H}_{2} / \mathrm{Pt}\) (d) \(\mathrm{Ag}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{2}^{+}\)in \(\mathrm{NH}_{3} / \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\) (e) \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{CrO}_{4}\), heat (f) \(\mathrm{HOCH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{OH}, \mathrm{HCl}^{2}\) (g) \(\mathrm{Zn}(\mathrm{Hg}) / \mathrm{HCl}\) (h) \(\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{4}, \mathrm{KOH}^{2}\) at \(250^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (i) \(\mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{5} \mathrm{NH}_{2}\) (j) \(\mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{5} \mathrm{NHNH}_{2}\) (k) \(\mathrm{NaClO}_{2}, \mathrm{NaH}_{2} \mathrm{PO}_{4}, 2\)-methyl-2-butene

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free