Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Acetic acid has a boiling point of \(118^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), whereas its methyl ester has a boiling point of \(57^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Account for the fact that the boiling point of acetic acid is higher than that of its methyl ester even though acetic acid has a lower molecular weight.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The boiling point of acetic acid is higher than its methyl ester due to the presence of strong hydrogen bonding in acetic acid, which leads to stronger intermolecular forces, despite acetic acid having a lower molecular weight.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the compounds

The first step is to identify the two compounds. The molecule acetic acid has the formula \(\mathrm{CH_3COOH}\), and its methyl ester has the formula \(\mathrm{CH_3COOCH_3}\).
02

Evaluating the molecular weights

Now, let's calculate the molecular weights of both compounds. This will help us compare their molecular weights and understand the problem statement better. For Acetic acid (\(\mathrm{CH_3COOH}\)): - Carbon (C): 2 atoms, each at 12.01 g/mol - Hydrogen (H): 4 atoms, each at 1.01 g/mol - Oxygen (O): 2 atoms, each at 16.00 g/mol Molecular weight of Acetic acid = \(2\times12.01 + 4\times1.01 + 2\times16.00 = 60.05\, \mathrm{g/mol}\). For Methyl ester (\(\mathrm{CH_3COOCH_3}\)): - Carbon (C): 3 atoms, each at 12.01 g/mol - Hydrogen (H): 6 atoms, each at 1.01 g/mol - Oxygen (O): 2 atoms, each at 16.00 g/mol Molecular weight of Methyl ester = \(3\times12.01 + 6\times1.01 + 2\times16.00 = 74.09\, \mathrm{g/mol}\). As we can see, despite having a lower molecular weight, acetic acid has a higher boiling point.
03

Analyzing intermolecular forces

Now, we need to analyze the intermolecular forces present in both compounds. Intermolecular forces are responsible for the boiling points of the compounds. Stronger intermolecular forces lead to higher boiling points. In acetic acid (\(\mathrm{CH_3COOH}\)), there's a highly polar O-H bond, allowing it to form strong hydrogen bonds with other acetic acid molecules. This strong hydrogen bonding results in a higher boiling point. In the methyl ester (\(\mathrm{CH_3COOCH_3}\)), though it has a polar C-O bond, it doesn't have any hydrogen bonding due to the absence of the highly polar O-H bond. Instead, it has weaker dipole-dipole and van der Waals forces between the molecules.
04

Conclusion

Based on the analysis of molecular weight and intermolecular forces, we can conclude that the boiling point of acetic acid (\(\mathrm{CH_3COOH}\)) is higher than that of its methyl ester (\(\mathrm{CH_3COOCH_3}\)) because of the presence of strong hydrogen bonding in acetic acid, which leads to stronger intermolecular forces, despite acetic acid having a lower molecular weight.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The monopotassium salt of oxalic acid is present in certain leafy vegetables, including rhubarb. Both oxalic acid and its salts are poisonous in high concentrations. Draw the structural formula of monopotassium oxalate.

Given here are \({ }^{1} \mathrm{H}-\mathrm{NMR}\) and \({ }^{13} \mathrm{C}\)-NMR spectral data for nine compounds. Each compound shows strong absorption between 1720 and \(1700 \mathrm{~cm}^{-1}\) and strong, broad absorption over the region \(2500-3300 \mathrm{~cm}^{-1}\). Propose a structural formula for each compound. Refer to Appendices 4,5, and 6 for spectral correlation tables. (a) \(\mathrm{C}_{5} \mathrm{H}_{10} \mathrm{O}_{2}\) $$ \begin{array}{|cc|} \hline{ }^{1} \text { H-NMR } & { }^{13} \text { C-NMR } \\ \hline 0.94(\mathrm{t}, 3 \mathrm{H}) & 180.71 \\ 1.39(\mathrm{~m}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 33.89 \\ 1.62(\mathrm{~m}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 26.76 \\ 2.35(\mathrm{t}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 22.21 \\ 12.0(\mathrm{~s}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 13.69 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { (b) } \mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{12} \mathrm{O}_{2}\\\ &\begin{array}{|cr|} \hline{ }^{1} H-N M R & { }^{13} C-N M R \\ \hline 1.08(\mathrm{~s}, 9 \mathrm{H}) & 179.29 \\ 2.23(\mathrm{~s}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 47.82 \\ 12.1(\mathrm{~s}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 30.62 \\ & 29.57 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { (c) } \mathrm{C}_{5} \mathrm{H}_{8} \mathrm{O}_{4}\\\ &\begin{array}{|cc|} \hline{ }^{1} \text { H-NMR } & { }^{13} \mathrm{C}-\mathrm{NMR} \\ \hline 0.93(\mathrm{t}, 3 \mathrm{H}) & 170.94 \\ 1.80(\mathrm{~m}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 53.28 \\ 3.10(\mathrm{t}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 21.90 \\ 12.7(\mathrm{~s}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 11.81 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { (d) } \mathrm{C}_{5} \mathrm{H}_{8} \mathrm{O}_{4}\\\ &\begin{array}{|cc|} \hline{ }^{1} \mathrm{H}-\mathrm{NMR} & { }^{13} \mathrm{C}-\mathrm{NMR} \\ \hline 1.29(\mathrm{~s}, 6 \mathrm{H}) & 174.01 \\ 12.8(\mathrm{~s}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 48.77 \\ & 22.56 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { (e) } \mathrm{C}_{4} \mathrm{H}_{6} \mathrm{O}_{2}\\\ &\begin{array}{|cc|} \hline{ }^{1} \mathrm{H}-\mathrm{NMR} & { }^{13} \mathrm{C}-\mathrm{NMR} \\ \hline 1.91(\mathrm{~d}, 3 \mathrm{H}) & 172.26 \\ 5.86(\mathrm{~d}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 147.53 \\ 7.10(\mathrm{~m}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 122.24 \\ 12.4(\mathrm{~s}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 18.11 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { (f) } \mathrm{C}_{3} \mathrm{H}_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{2}\\\ &\begin{array}{|cc|} \hline{ }^{1} \text { H-NMR } & { }^{13} \mathrm{C}-\mathrm{NMR} \\ \hline 2.34(\mathrm{~s}, 3 \mathrm{H}) & 171.82 \\ 11.3(\mathrm{~s}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 79.36 \\ & 34.02 \\ & \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { (g) } \mathrm{C}_{5} \mathrm{H}_{8} \mathrm{Cl}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{2}\\\ &\begin{array}{|cr|} \hline{ }^{1} \text { H-NMR } & { }^{13} \text { C-NMR } \\ \hline 1.42(\mathrm{~s}, 6 \mathrm{H}) & 180.15 \\ 6.10(\mathrm{~s}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 77.78 \\ 12.4(\mathrm{~s}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 51.88 \\ & 20.71 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { (h) } \mathrm{C}_{5} \mathrm{H}_{9} \mathrm{BrO}_{2}\\\ &\begin{array}{|cr|} \hline{ }^{1} H-N M R & { }^{13} \text { C-NMR } \\ \hline 0.97(\mathrm{t}, 3 \mathrm{H}) & 176.36 \\ 1.50(\mathrm{~m}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 45.08 \\ 2.05(\mathrm{~m}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 36.49 \\ 4.25(\mathrm{t}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 20.48 \\ 12.1(\mathrm{~s}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 13.24 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { (i) } \mathrm{C}_{4} \mathrm{H}_{8} \mathrm{O}_{3}\\\ &\begin{array}{|cc|} \hline{ }^{1} \mathrm{H}-\mathrm{NMR} & { }^{13} \mathrm{C}-\mathrm{NMR} \\ \hline 2.62(\mathrm{t}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 177.33 \\ 3.38(\mathrm{~s}, 3 \mathrm{H}) & 67.55 \\ 3.68(\mathrm{~s}, 2 \mathrm{H}) & 58.72 \\ 11.5(\mathrm{~s}, 1 \mathrm{H}) & 34.75 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

Show how cyclohexanecarboxylic acid could be synthesized from cyclohexane in good yield.

The reaction of an \(\alpha\)-diketone with concentrated sodium or potassium hydroxide to give the salt of an \(\alpha\)-hydroxyacid is given the general name benzil-benzilic acid rearrangement. It is illustrated by the conversion of benzil to sodium benzilate and then to benzilic acid. Propose a mechanism for this rearrangement.

The \(K_{\mathrm{a} 1}\) of ascorbic acid is \(7.94 \times 10^{-5}\). Would you expect ascorbic acid dissolved in blood plasma (pH 7.35-7.45) to exist primarily as ascorbic acid or as ascorbate anion? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free