Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Treatment of 1-ethoxybutane with HI leads to both butyl iodide and ethyl iodide, along with the related alcohols. By contrast, when tert-butyl ethyl ether is treated the same way, only ethyl iodide and tert-butyl alcohol are formed. tert-Butyl iodide and ethyl alcohol are not produced. Explain. $$ \begin{gathered} \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{3} \\ \text { | } \mathrm{HI} \\ \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{I}+\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{I} \\ \text { and } \\ \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{OH}+\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{OH} \end{gathered} $$ $$ \left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3} \mathrm{C}-\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{3} \stackrel{\mathrm{HI}}{\longrightarrow}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3} \mathrm{COH}+\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{I} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
1-Ethoxybutane forms butyl iodide and ethyl iodide due to possible cleavages. tert-Butyl ethyl ether only forms tert-butyl alcohol and ethyl iodide, favoring S_N1 mechanism with a stable carbocation intermediate.

Step by step solution

01

- Understand the Reactants

Identify the structures and names of the compounds involved. We are dealing with 1-ethoxybutane \( \text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{-O-}\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_3 \) and tert-butyl ethyl ether \( (\text{CH}_3)_3\text{C-O-}\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_3 \).
02

- Understand the Products

For 1-ethoxybutane with HI, we get butyl iodide and ethyl iodide \( \text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{I} \) and \( \text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{I} \), along with butyl alcohol and ethyl alcohol \( \text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{OH} \) and \( \text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{OH} \). For tert-butyl ethyl ether treated with HI, we get tert-butyl alcohol \( (\text{CH}_3)_3\text{COH} \) and ethyl iodide \( \text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{I} \), with no tert-butyl iodide or ethyl alcohol.
03

- Analyze the Mechanism for 1-Ethoxybutane

This reaction proceeds through an S_N1 or S_N2 mechanism. Both butyl iodide and ethyl iodide form because the ethoxy group can cleave at either side, both forming stable cation/anion intermediates. This allows both side-products to form.
04

- Analyze the Mechanism for tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether

Tert-butyl group forms a stable carbocation when leaving, making S_N1 mechanism best. The formation of the tert-butyl carbocation \( (\text{CH}_3)_3\text{C}^+ \) is favored, leading to tert-butyl alcohol instead of tert-butyl iodide.
05

- Summarize Observations

In the case of tert-butyl ethyl ether, the reaction selectively favors the S_N1 mechanism due to the stability of the tert-butyl carbocation. Thus, no tert-butyl iodide or ethyl alcohol, only tert-butyl alcohol and ethyl iodide.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

ether cleavage
Ether cleavage is the breaking of an ether molecule into two separate compounds when treated with hydroiodic acid (HI). In our exercise, we see two examples: 1-ethoxybutane and tert-butyl ethyl ether. When HI reacts with 1-ethoxybutane, the ether bond can break in two different places, leading to the formation of two sets of products: butyl iodide and ethyl iodide, as well as their corresponding alcohols. However, in tert-butyl ethyl ether, only ethyl iodide and tert-butyl alcohol are produced without the formation of tert-butyl iodide or ethyl alcohol. This difference is rooted in the mechanisms and stability of intermediates formed during the reaction.
S_N1 and S_N2 mechanisms
The terms S_N1 and S_N2 refer to different types of organic reaction mechanisms for nucleophilic substitution.
  • S_N1 Mechanism: This is a two-step process where the leaving group departs first, forming a carbocation intermediate. It proceeds via a unimolecular rate-determining step.

  • S_N2 Mechanism: This is a one-step process where the nucleophile attacks the carbon atom from the opposite side of the leaving group, leading to a simultaneous bond formation and bond breaking step. It proceeds via a bimolecular rate-determining step.
Understanding these mechanisms helps explain why different products form under seemingly similar conditions.
carbocation stability
Carbocation stability plays a crucial role in determining the pathway and products of ether cleavage. Carbocations are positively charged carbon atoms with three bonds and no lone pairs. Their stability depends on the number of alkyl groups attached:
  • Primary (1°) Carbocation: Least stable with only one alkyl group attached.
  • Secondary (2°) Carbocation: More stable with two alkyl groups attached.
  • Tertiary (3°) Carbocation: Most stable with three alkyl groups attached.
In our case, the tert-butyl group forms a stable tertiary carbocation, favoring the S_N1 mechanism and thus leading to the production of tert-butyl alcohol.
product distribution
The products of ether cleavage depend on the stability of the intermediates formed during the reaction. For 1-ethoxybutane, both butyl iodide and ethyl iodide are produced because the cleavage can occur at either side of the ether bond, leading to both primary and secondary cation/anion intermediates. The stability difference is not significant, allowing both products to form in similar amounts.
However, for tert-butyl ethyl ether, only ethyl iodide and tert-butyl alcohol are produced. The stable tert-butyl carbocation prefers to form, preventing the formation of tert-butyl iodide.
organic reaction mechanisms
Understanding the organic reaction mechanisms helps in predicting and explaining the outcome of chemical reactions. In our cases:
  • 1-Ethoxybutane: The reaction can proceed through either S_N1 or S_N2 mechanisms, forming a mix of products.
  • Tert-butyl ethyl ether: The reaction predominantly follows the S_N1 pathway due to the formation of a stable tertiary carbocation, directing the product formation towards tert-butyl alcohol and ethyl iodide.
By analyzing the intermediate states, we can see why certain products form over others, illustrating the importance of mechanisms in organic chemistry.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The \(\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{N}} 2\) reaction that occurs between an alkyl halide and a nucleophile is a very important process in organic chemistry. For this reason, it is necessary to recognize the nucleophilicity of various reagents. In the following pairs of compounds, indicate the more nucleophilic reagent. Explain your reasoning. (a) \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2}\right)_{3} \mathrm{~N} \quad\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2}\right)_{3} \mathrm{P}\) (b) \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2}\right)_{3} \mathrm{~N} \quad\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2}\right)_{2} \mathrm{~N}^{-}\) (c) \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{SNa} \quad \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{OK}\) There is much detail in this chapter, but that is not usually a problem for most students. Good nucleophiles can be distinguished from good bases, good leaving groups can be identified, and so on. What is hard is to learn to adjust reaction conditions (reagents, temperature, and solvent) so as to achieve the desired selectivity to favor the product of just one of these four reactions. That's hard in practice as well as in answering a question on an exam or problem set. To a certain extent, we all have to learn to live with this problem!

Which nucleophiles would serve to effect the following conversions of 1 -iodopropane? (a) I \(^{-}\) (b) CCCN=[N+]=[N-] (c) CCCS (d) CCCC#N (e) CCCOCCC (f) CCCOc1ccccc1

You are given a supply of ethyl iodide, tertbutyl iodide, sodium ethoxide, and sodium tert-butoxide. Your task is to use the \(\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{N}} 2\) reaction to make as many different ethers as you can. In principle, how many are possible? In practice, how many can you make?

(a) Reaction of 1,2-dimethylpyrrolidine (1) with ethyl iodide leads to two isomeric ammonium ions, \(\mathrm{C}_{8} \mathrm{H}_{18} \mathrm{IN}\). Explain. (b) However, when 2-methylpyrrolidine (2) undergoes a similar reaction with ethyl iodide, followed by treatment with weak base, analysis of the product by \({ }^{1} \mathrm{H}\) NMR spectroscopy reveals only one set of signals for \(\mathrm{C}_{7} \mathrm{H}_{15} \mathrm{~N}\). Explain.

Wait! The argument just presented ignores angle strain in the starting material. Cyclopropane itself is strained. Won't that strain raise the energy of the starting material and offset the energy rise of the transition state? Comment. Hint: Consider angle strain in both starting material and transition state-in which will it be more important?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free