Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Each of the following cations is capable of rearranging to a more stable cation. Limiting yourself to a single 1,1 -shift, suggest a structure for the rearranged cation. (a) \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CHCH}_{3} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{HCH}_{3}\) (b) \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{CHCH}_{3}\) (c) \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{HCH}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right) \mathrm{C}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3}\) (d) \(\mathrm{CH}_{2}=\mathrm{CHCH}_{2} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{HCH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{3}\) (e) \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OCH}_{2} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{HC}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The rearranged cations after single 1,1-shift are: (a) \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{HCH}_{3}\) (b) \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{2} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CHCH}_{3}\) (c) \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{CH} \mathrm{CH}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right) \mathrm{C}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3}\) (d) \(\mathrm{CH}_{2}=\mathrm{CH} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{3}\) (e) \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{CH} \left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3}\)

Step by step solution

01

(a) Rearrangement of CH3CHCH3C+HCH3

First, identify the possible 1,1-shifts for the molecule. A hydride shift from the neighboring carbon to the carbocation center will result in the migration of a hydrogen: \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CHCH}_{3} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{HCH}_{3} \xrightarrow{1,1\text{-shift}} \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{HCH}_{3}\)
02

(b) Rearrangement of (CH3)3C+CHCH3

For this carbocation, a methyl shift from the neighboring carbon to the carbocation center will result in the migration of a methyl group: \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{CHCH}_{3} \xrightarrow{1,1\text{-shift}} \left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{2} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CHCH}_{3}\)
03

(c) Rearrangement of CH3CH2CH2C+HCH(CH3)C(CH3)3

For this carbocation, a hydride shift from the neighboring carbon to the carbocation center will result in the migration of a hydrogen: \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{HCH}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right) \mathrm{C}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3} \xrightarrow{1,1\text{-shift}} \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{CH} \mathrm{CH}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right) \mathrm{C}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3}\)
04

(d) Rearrangement of CH2=CHCH2C+HCH2CH3

For this carbocation, a hydride shift from the neighboring carbon to the carbocation center will result in the migration of a hydrogen: \(\mathrm{CH}_{2}=\mathrm{CHCH}_{2} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{HCH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{3} \xrightarrow{1,1\text{-shift}} \mathrm{CH}_{2}=\mathrm{CH} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{3}\)
05

(e) Rearrangement of CH3OCH2C+HC(CH3)3

For this carbocation, a hydride shift from the neighboring carbon to the carbocation center will result in the migration of a hydrogen: \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OCH}_{2} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{HC}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3} \xrightarrow{1,1\text{-shift}} \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{C}^{+} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{CH} \left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{3}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

1,1-shift
In organic chemistry, a 1,1-shift refers to the intramolecular rearrangement where a substituent, such as a hydrogen (hydride) or an alkyl group (methyl or ethyl), migrates from one carbon atom to an adjacent carbon cationic center. This process occurs in an attempt to stabilize the positively charged intermediate formed during some organic reactions.

For example, consider a carbocation with a positively charged carbon atom. If an adjacent carbon has a hydrogen or an alkyl group that can be transferred to the cationic center, this movement, known as a 1,1-shift, can lead to a more stable carbocation. The driving force for this rearrangement is the overall decrease in energy of the system as the positive charge becomes more delocalized or placed on a more stable center.
Hydride Shift
A hydride shift is a specific type of 1,1-shift where a hydride ion (a hydrogen atom with an extra electron, represented as H-) moves from one carbon to an adjacent carbocation center. This migration often creates a more stabilized carbocation structure.

In the context of the solved exercise, the hydride shift helps achieve a more stable carbocation by moving a hydrogen from a carbon that is next to the carbocation. This transfer allows for the filling of the electron deficiency at the cationic center by supplying a pair of electrons from the hydride. The effect of a hydride shift is noticeable in various organic reaction mechanisms, where creating a more stable intermediate can significantly alter the pathway and outcome of the reactions.
Methyl Shift
Similar to the hydride shift, a methyl shift involves the migration of a methyl group, rather than a hydrogen atom, during a 1,1-shift. The methyl group (CH3) moves from one carbon atom to the neighboring carbocation center to stabilize the carbocation.

During this rearrangement, the entire methyl group, including its three hydrogen atoms, shifts to the adjacent carbon with a positive charge. The process can be energetically favorable if it results in a more stable cation, often because the new carbocation is better able to share or delocalize the positive charge through its structure, for example, by forming a tertiary carbocation from a secondary one.
Carbocation Stability
Carbocation stability plays a crucial role in the occurrence of 1,1-shifts, as these rearrangements are often driven by the formation of a more stable carbocation. Stability is influenced by several factors, including the degree of alkyl substitution: tertiary carbocations (surrounded by three carbon groups) are more stable than secondary and primary carbocations due to hyperconjugation and the inductive effect.

Moreover, the presence of electron-donating groups nearby can help stabilize the positive charge by delocalization or resonance. As a general rule, the more stable the carbocation, the more favored is its formation. Hence, reaction mechanisms involving carbocations will often include steps like hydride and methyl shifts that generate the most stable carbocation achievable from the starting structure.
Organic Reaction Mechanisms
Organic reaction mechanisms involve the step-by-step breakdown of how a chemical reaction occurs at the molecular level. A deep understanding of these mechanisms allows chemists to predict the products of a reaction and design pathways for synthesizing complex molecules. Carbocation rearrangements, such as 1,1-shifts including hydride and methyl shifts, are critical parts of many organic reaction mechanisms and are crucial for synthesizing a wide variety of chemical compounds.

These rearrangements are often encountered in reactions such as alkene additions, nucleophilic substitutions, and electrophilic aromatic substitution. Understanding how and why these shifts occur can help students grasp the nuances of reaction pathways and the principles governing the stability and reactivity of intermediates.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose a water solution was made up initially to be \(0.01 \mathrm{M}\) in methyl bromide and \(1.0 \mathrm{M}\) in sodium acetate at \(50^{\circ}\). In water, the \(\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{N}} 2\) rate constant for reaction of hydroxide ion with methyl bromide at \(50^{\circ}\) is \(30 \times 10^{-4}\) liters \(/ \mathrm{mole} / \mathrm{sec}\), whereas that of acetate ion at \(50^{\circ}\) is \(1.0 \times 10^{-}\) liters/mole/sec. The ionization constant of acetic acid at \(50^{\circ}\) is \(1.8 \times 10^{-5}\). In the following, assume perfect solutions and neglect the rates of reaction of methyl bromide with water or acetic acid by themselves and any further reactions of methyl acetate: (a) Calculate the hydroxide-ion concentration in the initial solution. (b) Calculate the initial rates of formation of methyl acetate and methanol. (c) What kind of information would be needed to predict what products would be expected from a solution of methyl bromide and sodium hydroxide in methanol? Explain.

(a) What product would be formed if the reaction of cis- 4-bromocyclohexanol with \(\mathrm{OH}^{-}\) proceeded with inversion? (b) Without inversion? (c) Is it always necessary to use optically active compounds to study the stereochemistry of substitution reactions?

Optically active 2 -iodooctane, upon standing in an acetone solution containing \(\mathrm{Nal}^{131}\), loses its chirality and exchanges its \(\mathrm{I}^{127}\) for \(\mathrm{I}^{131}\). In addition, while the rate of reaction is dependent on both [RI] and \(\left[\mathrm{I}^{-}\right]\) racemization proceeds twice as fast as isotopic exchange. Explain. vent Affects

Outline all steps in a possible laboratory synthesis of each of the following, using benzene, toluene, and any needed aliphatic or inorganic reagents. (a) p-bromobenzyl chloride (b) triphenylchloromethane (c) allyl iodide (d) benzal bromide (e) \(\mathrm{m}\) -nitrobenzotrichloride (f) 1,2 -dichloro-1- phenylethane (g) phenylacetylene (h) phenylcyclopropane

Two scientists, working in separate labs, were looking into the properties of limestone. Two months later, both published their results in a highly renowned journal causing a great controversy amoung the cognoscenti of Organic Chemistry. Said one: "Limestone is quite stable, it is able to withstand centuries of atmospheric exposure.' The other said, "Limestone is extremely reactive, dissolving very rapidly in \(\mathrm{HCl}\) to produce \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{CaCl}_{2}\). The two statements seem mutually exclusive. Assuming that each scientist is correct, explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free