Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The \(E\). coli nickel-binding protein binds to its ligand, \(\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}\), with a \(K_{\mathrm{d}}\) of \(100 \mathrm{~nm}\). Calculate the \(\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}\) concentration when the fraction of binding sites occupied by the ligand \((Y)\) is (a) \(0.25\), (b) \(0.6\), (c) \(0.95 .\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
To find \\([ ump{Ni}^{2+}]\\), use \\([ ump{Ni}^{2+}] = \frac{YK_d}{1-Y} \\).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Binding Equation

To tackle this problem, we need to use the equation for fractional occupancy \( Y \) in terms of the dissociation constant \( K_d \) and the ligand concentration \( [ump{Ni}^{2+}] \): \[ Y = \frac{[ump{Ni}^{2+}]}{K_d + [ump{Ni}^{2+}]} \].This equation describes the fraction of binding sites occupied \( Y \) in terms of the concentration of the ligand and the dissociation constant \( K_d \). We will solve for the concentration of \( [ump{Ni}^{2+}] \) at given occupancy levels.
02

Rearrange the Equation for [ ump{Ni}^{2+}]

We need to rearrange the formula \( Y = \frac{[ump{Ni}^{2+}]}{K_d + [ump{Ni}^{2+}]} \) to solve for \([ump{Ni}^{2+}]\). Multiplying both sides by \(K_d + [ump{Ni}^{2+}]\) and simplifying gives us: \[ Y(K_d + [ump{Ni}^{2+}]) = [ump{Ni}^{2+}], \],which can be further rearranged to:\[ YK_d + Y[ump{Ni}^{2+}] = [ump{Ni}^{2+}]. \]Finally, isolating \([ump{Ni}^{2+}]\) gives:\[ (1-Y)[ump{Ni}^{2+}] = YK_d \]\[ [ump{Ni}^{2+}] = \frac{YK_d}{1-Y} \].

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ligand Binding
Ligand binding is a fundamental concept in biochemistry. It describes the process where molecules, called ligands, interact with specific proteins or receptors. This interaction often occurs at a binding site characterized by its shape, charge, and hydrophobic or hydrophilic properties that complement the ligand. Ligands can be various types of molecules, such as ions, small molecules, or even other proteins. When a ligand binds to a protein, it can trigger a biological response, which is crucial for many cellular processes. For example, hormones binding to their receptors to initiate signaling pathways.

In the context of our exercise, the ligand in question is the nickel ion \(\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}\). The specific protein in \(E. coli\) binds this ion with a certain affinity, measured by how tightly or weakly it holds onto the \(\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}\). Understanding this binding helps us solve how much of the ligand is required to reach certain levels of protein activation, also known as fractional occupancy.
Dissociation Constant
The dissociation constant, \(K_d\), is a critical parameter in the study of ligand-protein interactions. It provides a quantitative measure of the affinity between a ligand and its binding site on a protein. The \(K_d\) value is defined as the concentration of the ligand at which half of the available binding sites are occupied.

A low \(K_d\) indicates strong binding affinity, meaning the ligand binds tightly to the protein. Conversely, a high \(K_d\) suggests weaker binding affinity. For the \(E. coli\) nickel-binding protein, the \(K_d\) of 100 nm tells us that at this concentration of \(\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}\), half of the protein's binding sites are occupied. This knowledge aids in calculating \(\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}\) concentrations for different levels of site occupancy.
Fractional Occupancy
Fractional occupancy, or \(Y\), refers to the proportion of binding sites on a protein that are occupied by ligand molecules. It is a dimensionless number ranging from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates no occupied sites and 1 indicates full occupation. This concept is central to understanding how effectively a ligand can engage a protein at given concentrations.

The equation \( Y = \frac{[\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}]}{K_d + [\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}]}\) allows us to compute \(Y\) based on the known \(K_d\) and the concentration of the ligand. By rearranging this equation, as shown in the solution, we find the necessary ligand concentration to achieve a specific fractional occupancy. For example, for \(Y = 0.95\), the ligand concentration reflects the scenario where most of the binding sites are occupied, indicating strong binding conditions. This calculation is critical for applications such as drug design, where target saturation is often required for therapeutic efficacy.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of these situations would produce a Hill plot with \(n_{\mathrm{H}}<1.0\) ? Explain your reasoning in each case. a. The protein has multiple subunits, each with a single ligand-binding site. Ligand binding to one site decreases the binding affinity of other sites for the ligand. b. The protein is a single polypeptide with two ligandbinding sites, each having a different affinity for the ligand. c. The protein is a single polypeptide with a single ligand-binding site. As purified, the protein preparation is heterogeneous, containing some protein molecules that are partially denatured and thus have a lower binding affinity for the ligand. d. The protein has multiple subunits, each with a single ligand-binding site. Ligands bind independently to each site, do not affect the binding affinity of other sites, and bind with identical affinities.

Studies of oxygen transport in pregnant mammals show that the \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) saturation curves of fetal and maternal blood are markedly different when measured under the same conditions. Fetal erythrocytes contain a structural variant of hemoglobin, HbF, consisting of two \(a\) and two \(\gamma\) subunits \(\left(\alpha_{2} \gamma_{2}\right)\), whereas maternal erythrocytes contain \(\mathrm{HbA}\left(\alpha_{2} \beta_{2}\right)\). a. Which hemoglobin has a higher affinity for oxygen under physiologic conditions? b. What is the physiological significance of the different \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) affinities? When all the BPG is carefully removed from samples of \(\mathrm{HbA}\) and \(\mathrm{HbF}\), the measured \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\)-saturation curves (and consequently the \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) affinities) are displaced to the left. However, HbA now has a greater affinity for oxygen than does HbF. When BPG is reintroduced, the \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\)-saturation curves return to normal, as shown in the graph. c. What is the effect of BPG on the \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) affinity of hemoglobin? How can this information be used to explain the different \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) affinities of fetal and maternal hemoglobin?

A monoclonal antibody binds to Gactin but not to F-actin. What does this tell you about the epitope recognized by the antibody?

When a vertebrate dies, its muscles stiffen as they are deprived of ATP, a state called rigor mortis. Using your knowledge of the catalytic cycle of myosin in muscle contraction, explain the molecular basis of the rigor state.

The protein calcineurin binds to the protein calmodulin with an association rate of \(8.9 \times 10^{3} \mathrm{M}^{-1} \mathrm{~s}^{-1}\) and an overall dissociation constant, \(K_{\mathrm{d}}\), of 10 \(\mathrm{n} \mathrm{M}\). Calculate the dissociation rate, \(k_{\mathrm{d}}\), including appropriate units.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free