Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which of these situations would produce a Hill plot with \(n_{\mathrm{H}}<1.0\) ? Explain your reasoning in each case. a. The protein has multiple subunits, each with a single ligand-binding site. Ligand binding to one site decreases the binding affinity of other sites for the ligand. b. The protein is a single polypeptide with two ligandbinding sites, each having a different affinity for the ligand. c. The protein is a single polypeptide with a single ligand-binding site. As purified, the protein preparation is heterogeneous, containing some protein molecules that are partially denatured and thus have a lower binding affinity for the ligand. d. The protein has multiple subunits, each with a single ligand-binding site. Ligands bind independently to each site, do not affect the binding affinity of other sites, and bind with identical affinities.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Situations (a) and possibly (c) could have _{ ext{H}} < 1.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Hill Coefficient

The Hill coefficient ( _{ ext{H}} ) indicates the cooperativity of ligand binding to a protein. A value of _{ ext{H}} < 1 describes negative cooperativity, meaning the binding of one ligand decreases the affinity for subsequent ligands.
02

Evaluating Situation (a)

In situation (a), each subunit has a binding site, and binding to one site decreases the affinity of other sites. This is an example of negative cooperativity, leading to a Hill coefficient of _{ ext{H}} < 1 .
03

Evaluating Situation (b)

Situation (b) involves a single polypeptide with two ligand-binding sites, each with different affinities. The differing affinities imply that the binding events are independent, which would not necessarily lead to negative cooperativity. Hence, _{ ext{H}} may or may not be less than 1, depending on the specific details of binding.
04

Evaluating Situation (c)

In situation (c), heterogeneous protein preparation causes some molecules to have differing affinities. This could lead to an overall average of decreased affinity without explicit negative cooperativity among binding sites. Potentially, this could yield _{ ext{H}} < 1 .
05

Evaluating Situation (d)

For situation (d), multiple subunits with independent binding sites and identical affinities that do not affect each other suggest no cooperativity. This independence leads to a Hill coefficient of _{ ext{H}} = 1 , not less than 1.
06

Reaching a Conclusion

Based on the evaluations, situations (a) and potentially (c) are where _{ ext{H}} < 1 . Situation (a) displays negative cooperativity directly, while situation (c) has heterogeneous affinities that might have a similar effect.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Negative Cooperativity
Negative cooperativity in the context of ligand binding refers to a phenomenon where the binding of a ligand to one site on a protein reduces the affinity of other sites for the same ligand. This is a fascinating contrast to positive cooperativity where binding increases the affinity. Negative cooperativity can be observed when a protein has multiple binding sites that do not work completely independently.

When one site is occupied, it causes a conformational change in the protein that makes other sites less attractive to additional ligands. This kind of interaction is characterized by a Hill coefficient ( _{H} ) of less than 1. Negative cooperativity influences biological processes by ensuring that a response to a substrate does not escalate rapidly, thereby stabilizing the system.

  • Examples exist in enzymes and receptors, which helps in fine-tuning cellular responses.
  • It is crucial in situations needing gradual response to changes in ligand concentration.
Ligand Binding
Ligand binding is a key process in biochemistry where molecules, known as ligands, attach to specific sites on a protein. This interaction can influence a protein’s function, activating or inhibiting it. The binding affinity refers to how tightly a ligand binds to these sites, which is critical for understanding protein function and regulation.

Proteins can have single or multiple ligand-binding sites, and the nature of these interactions (cooperative or independent) determines the mechanism of binding. In cooperative binding, the affinity changes with each ligand bound, either increasing (positive cooperativity) or decreasing (negative cooperativity).

  • Single ligand-binding sites are usually straightforward, impacting the protein function directly upon ligand binding.
  • Multiple sites can offer complex interactions, allowing for nuanced regulatory mechanisms.
Protein Subunits
Proteins can be composed of multiple subunits, each potentially having ligand-binding sites. This multimeric structure allows proteins to exhibit cooperative behavior, shared through the interactions between subunits. The conformational change in one subunit upon ligand binding can affect others, either enhancing or reducing their ligand-binding affinity.

The protein's quaternary structure, the arrangement of these subunits, is crucial in understanding the protein's total function and regulatory capabilities. In cases of negative cooperativity, the binding of a ligand to one subunit reduces the likelihood of ligands binding to other subunits.

  • Examples include hemoglobin, which, despite being mostly positive cooperativity, involves subunit interaction for oxygen binding.
  • Understanding subunit interactions is vital for drug design, targeting allosteric sites that influence protein function.
Biochemistry Concepts
Diving into biochemistry concepts such as Hill coefficient, cooperativity, and protein-ligand interactions helps in decoding the complexity of biological mechanisms. These concepts are integral for understanding how proteins behave in cellular contexts and how they can be modulated.

The Hill coefficient is particularly significant as it provides a quantitative measure of cooperativity, revealing important insights into the binding dynamics. A Hill coefficient less than 1 indicates negative cooperativity, equal to 1 suggests non-cooperative binding, and greater than 1 indicates positive cooperativity.

  • These principles are pivotal in elucidating drug mechanisms, enzyme regulation, and signal transduction processes.
  • Fundamental biochemical concepts underscore everything from therapeutic treatments to industrial applications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The \(E\). coli nickel-binding protein binds to its ligand, \(\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}\), with a \(K_{\mathrm{d}}\) of \(100 \mathrm{~nm}\). Calculate the \(\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}\) concentration when the fraction of binding sites occupied by the ligand \((Y)\) is (a) \(0.25\), (b) \(0.6\), (c) \(0.95 .\)

Under appropriate conditions, hemoglobin dissociates into its four subunits. The isolated \(a\) subunit binds oxygen, but the \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\)-saturation curve is hyperbolic rather than sigmoid. In addition, the binding of oxygen to the isolated \(a\) subunit is not affected by the presence of \(\mathrm{H}^{+}, \mathrm{CO}_{2}\), or BPG. What do these observations indicate about the source of the cooperativity in hemoglobin?

An antibody with high affinity for its antigen has a \(K_{\mathrm{d}}\) in the low nanomolar range. Assume an antibody binds an antigen with a \(K_{\mathrm{d}}\) of \(5 \times 10^{-8}\) M. Calculate the antigen concentration when \(Y\), the fraction of binding sites occupied by the ligand, is a. \(0.4\), b. \(0.5\), c. \(0.8\), d. \(0.9\).

A team of biochemists uses genetic engineering to modify the interface region between hemoglobin subunits. The resulting hemoglobin variants exist in solution primarily as \(a \beta\) dimers (few, if any, \(\alpha_{2} \beta_{2}\) tetramers form). Are these variants likely to bind oxygen more weakly or more tightly? Explain your answer.

The protein calcineurin binds to the protein calmodulin with an association rate of \(8.9 \times 10^{3} \mathrm{M}^{-1} \mathrm{~s}^{-1}\) and an overall dissociation constant, \(K_{\mathrm{d}}\), of 10 \(\mathrm{n} \mathrm{M}\). Calculate the dissociation rate, \(k_{\mathrm{d}}\), including appropriate units.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free