While studying human transcription in the 1960s, James Darnell carried out an
experiment that has become a classic in biochemistry, but at the time, it was
incredibly perplexing. Darnell and coworkers used radioactive isotopes, such
as \({ }^{32} \mathrm{P}\) ]-labeled phosphate, to isolate and quantify RNAs
from a cultured line of human cancer cells (HeLa). With this approach, they
were able to identify those RNAs present in the nucleus and those present in
the cytoplasm. The results were puzzling, because it was obvious that a large
amount of transcription was occurring in the nucleus, but comparatively little
radioactive mRNA was isolated from the cytoplasm. Moreover, the nuclear-
isolated RNAs were much longer than those isolated from the cytoplasm. What
can account for these observations?