Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What are London dispersion forces and how do they arise in a nonpolar molecule? Are London forces typically stronger or weaker than dipole-dipole attractions between polar molecules? Are London forces stronger or weaker than covalent bonds? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
London dispersion forces are weak intermolecular attractions arising in all molecules, including nonpolar ones, due to temporary fluctuations in electron density. They are weaker than both dipole-dipole attractions, which are a result of permanent dipoles, and covalent bonds that involve the sharing of electron pairs between atoms.

Step by step solution

01

Defining London Dispersion Forces

London dispersion forces are weak intermolecular attractive forces that arise in all molecules, including nonpolar molecules, due to the temporary random fluctuations in the electron cloud around molecules. They are a type of van der Waals force and are also known as dispersion forces, London forces, or instantaneous dipole-induced dipole forces.
02

Explaining the Origin of London Dispersion Forces in Nonpolar Molecules

In nonpolar molecules, the electrons are distributed evenly throughout the molecule. However, at any given moment, the electron density might become temporarily uneven, creating an instantaneous dipole. This instantaneous dipole induces a dipole in the neighboring molecule by attracting or repelling its electrons. Now, these two temporary dipoles will experience weak attractive forces, known as London dispersion forces.
03

Comparing London Forces to Dipole-Dipole Attractions

London forces are typically weaker than dipole-dipole attractions. Dipole-dipole attractions result from the electrostatic interaction between the positive and negative poles of polar molecules, which are permanent dipoles. Due to the more consistent presence of dipoles in polar molecules, dipole-dipole attractions are generally stronger than the temporary dipoles created by London dispersion forces.
04

Comparing London Forces to Covalent Bonds

London dispersion forces are much weaker than covalent bonds. Covalent bonds involve the sharing of electron pairs between atoms, resulting in a strong and consistent bond. In contrast, London dispersion forces arise from temporary fluctuations in electron density and are generally weaker than either ionic or covalent bonds.
05

Conclusion

London dispersion forces are weak intermolecular forces that arise in all molecules, including nonpolar ones, due to temporary fluctuations in electron density. These forces are weaker than both dipole-dipole attractions and covalent bonds. While London forces play an essential role in stabilizing nonpolar molecules, they are not as strong as the forces and bonds that result from permanent dipoles or covalent bonding.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What are crystalline solids? What kind of microscopic structure do such solids have? How is this microscopic structure reflected in the macroscopic appearance of such solids?

Choose one of the following terms to match the definition or description given. a. alloy b. specific heat c. crystalline solid d. dipole-dipole attraction e. equilibrium vapor pressure f. intermolecular g. intramolecular h. ionic solids i. London dispersion forces j. molar heat of fusion k. molar heat of vaporization I. molecular solids m. normal boiling point n. semiconductor energy required to melt 1 mol of a substance

The boiling points of the noble gas elements are listed below. Comment on the trend in the boiling points. Why do the boiling points vary in this manner? $$\begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{llll} \mathrm{He} & -272^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & \mathrm{Kr} & -152.3^{\circ} \mathrm{C} \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{llll} \text { Ne } & -245.9^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & \text { Xe }-107.1^{\circ} \mathrm{C} \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{llll} \mathrm{Ar} & -185.7^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & \mathrm{Rn} & -61.8^{\circ} \mathrm{C} \end{array} \end{aligned}$$

Which substance in each pair would be expected to be less volatile? Explain your reasoning. a. \(\mathrm{C}_{4} \mathrm{H}_{10}(l)\) or \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(l)\) b. \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}(l)\) or \(\mathrm{NH}_{2} \mathrm{OH}(l)\) c. \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OH}(l)\) or \(\mathrm{CH}_{4}(l)\)

The following data have been collected for substance X. Construct a heating curve for substance X. (The drawing does not need to be absolutely to scale, but it should clearly show relative differences.) normal melting point molar heat of fusion normal boiling point molar heat of vaporization \(-15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) \(2.5 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol}\) \(134^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) \(55.3 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free