Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

\(\mathrm{VB}\) and \(\mathrm{M} \mathrm{O}\) approaches to the bonding in linear \(\mathrm{XH}_{2}\) (X has \(2 s\) and \(2 p\) valence atomic orbitals) give pictures in which the \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{H}\) bonding is localized and delocalized respectively. Explain how this difference arises.

Short Answer

Expert verified
VB approach localizes bonds between atom pairs, while MO approach delocalizes bonds over the molecule.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding VB Approach

In the Valence Bond (VB) theory, atomic orbitals from each atom combine to form localized bonds. For an \(\text{XH}_2\) molecule with X having \(2s\) and \(2p_x\) orbitals, the hybridization involved typically forms sp hybrid orbitals. These sp orbitals overlap with the hydrogen \(1s\) orbitals to form \(\text{X-H}\) bonds. Thus, each bond is localized between its corresponding pair of atoms.
02

Understanding MO Approach

In the Molecular Orbital (MO) theory, atomic orbitals from all atoms in a molecule combine to form molecular orbitals. In \(\text{XH}_2\), X's \(2s\) and \(2p_x\) orbitals combine with the hydrogen \(1s\) orbitals to form bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals. These molecular orbitals are delocalized over the entire molecule, meaning the electron density is spread across all three atoms, rather than being confined to pairs.
03

Localized vs Delocalized Bonding

The key difference between the two approaches lies in the treatment of electron density. In the VB approach, the electron density is localized between individual pairs of atoms forming covalent bonds. In contrast, the MO theory describes bonding in terms of electron density that is delocalized over the entire molecule, resulting in a different picture of bonding.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Valence Bond Theory
Valence Bond (VB) Theory provides a detailed framework for understanding how atoms form bonds in molecules. Imagine atomic orbitals coming from individual atoms and merging to form localized bonds. These are bonds where the electrons are shared between two specific atoms.
In the scenario of an \(\text{XH}_2\) molecule, the atom labeled \(\text{X}\) possesses both \(2s\) and \(2p_x\) orbitals. Through a process called hybridization, these orbitals mix to create two equivalent sp hybrid orbitals. These sp hybrids are then used to overlap with the \(1s\) orbitals of hydrogen atoms, forming the localized \(\text{X-H}\) bonds.
Key ideas about Valence Bond Theory include:
  • Bond Formation: Bonds form by the overlapping of atomic orbitals.
  • Localized Bonding: Electrons are shared between specific pairs of atoms.
  • Hybridization: Mixing of atomic orbitals to form new hybrid orbitals.
In essence, VB Theory emphasizes the role of individual atomic orbitals and their transformation to form bonds that are specific to atom pairs.
Localized Bonding
Localized bonding is an essential concept in understanding how molecules form stable structures. It refers to the sharing of electron pairs between two atoms, creating a bond that is specific to them.
Within the local bonding framework, each bond is seen as an individual and distinct unit. Think of the bond as a two-way link between specific atoms. This can be visualized in the \(\text{XH}_2\) molecule where \(\text{X}\) and hydrogen atoms form discrete bonds. Notably, each \(\text{X-H}\) bond is formed through the overlap of \(\text{X}\)'s sp hybrid orbitals with hydrogen's \(1s\) orbital.
Benefits of localized bonding:
  • Specificity: Each bond corresponds to a particular pair of atoms.
  • Predictability: Helps in predicting molecular geometry by analyzing bond angles and lengths.
  • Strength: Often results in strong interactions due to direct overlap of orbitals.
Overall, localized bonding provides a clear picture of how individual atoms interact in a molecule.
Delocalized Bonding
Delocalized bonding offers a different perspective on how electrons are distributed across a molecule. Unlike local bonds, delocalized bonds involve sharing electron density over multiple atoms, leading to a more spread-out manner of bonding.
In Molecular Orbital (MO) Theory, the atomic orbitals from all participating atoms blend to form molecular orbitals that extend across the entire molecule. In an \(\text{XH}_2\) molecule, the electrons in the \(\text{X}-\text{H}\) bonds are not confined to just the bonds themselves but are spread over the atoms in the molecule. This spread results in molecular orbitals that can be classified as bonding, where electron density adds stability, and antibonding, where it detracts from stability.
Characteristics of delocalized bonding include:
  • Wide Distribution: Electron density encompasses a wide range of atoms.
  • Stability: Results in a stable molecule due to collective electron sharing.
  • Dynamic Properties: Provides insights into electronic transitions and reactive behaviors.
Delocalized bonding is pivotal in understanding the complex interactions that occur within molecules, shedding light on their dynamic properties.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suggest an appropriate hybridization scheme for the central atom in each of the following species: (a) \(\mathrm{SiF}_{4}\); (b) \(\left[\mathrm{PdCl}_{4}\right]^{2-} ;(\mathrm{c}) \mathrm{NF}_{3} ;(\mathrm{d}) \mathrm{F}_{2} \mathrm{O} ;(\mathrm{e})\left[\mathrm{CoH}_{5}\right]^{4-}\); \((\mathrm{f})\left[\mathrm{FeH}_{6}\right]^{4-} ;(\mathrm{g}) \mathrm{CS}_{2} ;(\mathrm{h}) \mathrm{BF}_{3}\).

(a) \(\mathrm{BCl}_{3}\) has \(D_{3 \mathrm{h}}\) symmetry. Draw the structure of \(\mathrm{BCl}_{3}\) and give values for the bond angles. \(\mathrm{NCl}_{3}\) has \(C_{3 \mathrm{v}}\) symmetry. Is it possible to state the bond angles from this information? (b) Derive the symmetry labels for the atomic orbitals on \(\mathrm{B}\) in \(\mathrm{BCl}_{3}\) and on \(\mathrm{N}\) in \(\mathrm{NCl}_{3}\).

(a) Draw the structure of \(\left[\mathrm{CO}_{3}\right]^{2-}\). (b) If all the \(\mathrm{C}-\mathrm{O}\) bond distances are equal, write a set of resonance structures to describe the bonding in \(\left[\mathrm{CO}_{3}\right]^{2-}\). (c) Describe the bonding in \(\left[\mathrm{CO}_{3}\right]^{2-}\) in terms of a hybridization scheme and compare the result with that obtained in part (b).

(a) What hybridization scheme would be appropriate for the Si atom in \(\mathrm{SiH}_{4}\) ? (b) To which point group does \(\mathrm{SiH}_{4}\) belong? (c) Sketch a qualitative MO diagram for the formation of \(\mathrm{SiH}_{4}\) from Si and an \(\mathrm{H}_{4}\) -fragment. Label all orbitals with appropriate symmetry labels.

What is meant by a ligand group orbital?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free