Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) If, in an clectron-transfer process, there is both electron and ligand transfer between reagents, what can you conclude about the mechanism? (b) Explain why very fast electron transfer between low-spin octahedral Os(II) and \(\mathrm{Os}(\mathrm{III})\) in a self-exchange reaction is possible.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The mechanism involves an inner-sphere electron transfer. (b) Rapid electron transfer occurs due to similar electronic configurations and minimal structural changes in low-spin octahedral Os complexes.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Electron and Ligand Transfer

In an electron-transfer process, when both electrons and ligands are transferred between reagents, we can conclude that the mechanism involves bond breaking and forming. This is indicative of an inner-sphere mechanism, where a shared ligand serves as a bridge for electron transfer between the two metal centers.
02

Describing the Inner-Sphere Mechanism

The inner-sphere mechanism involves a ligand that temporarily bridges the donor and acceptor metal centers. In this mechanism, the ligand binds to both metals sequentially or simultaneously, facilitating electron transfer. This leads to the transfer of both the electron and the ligand, which typically occurs in a series of steps rather than a single concerted motion.
03

Identifying Factors for Fast Electron Transfer

For the self-exchange reaction between low-spin octahedral Os(II) and Os(III), fast electron transfer is facilitated by the minimal structural change during the electron transfer, as the coordination geometry remains the same. Both the Os(II) and Os(III) complexes have similar electronic configurations, which allows for rapid electron transfer.
04

Understanding Low-Spin Complexes

Low-spin octahedral complexes, such as those involving Os(II) and Os(III), typically have smaller energy changes during electron transfer due to the stability of their electron configurations. This stability results in minimal rearrangement of ligands, which reduces the activation energy needed for the electron transfer process to occur rapidly.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Inner-Sphere Mechanism
When exploring the electron-transfer process in chemistry, an important concept to understand is the inner-sphere mechanism. This mechanism is crucial for reactions where both electron and ligand transfers are involved. Let's break it down step-by-step.

In an inner-sphere mechanism, a ligand plays a pivotal role as a bridge facilitating electron transfer. This ligand temporarily connects the donor and acceptor metal centers. As it bridges these centers, the ligand binds with each center either one after the other or simultaneously. This sequence of bindings facilitates the electron transfer, where the electron and ligand move together in synchronized steps rather than all at once.

The presence of a shared bridging ligand is what distinguishes the inner-sphere mechanism from other electron-transfer mechanisms. This process, due to its involvement of ligand and electron mobility, often signifies a complex form of electron transfer, unlike simple transfer processes that might occur without any such bridge.
Low-Spin Octahedral Complexes
Low-spin octahedral complexes are a fascinating area in coordination chemistry. They are defined by the arrangement of electrons in metal complexes, which can lead to unique electronic properties and behaviors.

In these complexes, electrons are paired in lower energy orbitals, leaving higher energy orbitals empty. This results in what is called a "low-spin" configuration. The main advantage of such configurations is their stability, as having fewer unpaired electrons generally means less repulsion within the metal complexes, leading to lower energy states.

For complexes like Os(II) and Os(III), low-spin states contribute to minimal changes during electron transfer. Because the electrons are already in a compact, low-energy state, there’s little need for rearrangements when an electron is transferred. This stability partly explains why there is limited energy fluctuation, which is beneficial for rapid, efficient electron transfers.
Self-Exchange Reaction
A self-exchange reaction is a unique type of electron transfer process. It's where two species of the same element but different oxidation states exchange an electron without any net chemical change. Such reactions are influenced heavily by certain factors, such as coordination spheres and electronic structures.

One excellent example is the self-exchange reaction between low-spin octahedral Os(II) and Os(III). The speed of this reaction is remarkable. The reason? The exceptionally similar coordination geometry and electronic configurations of the Os(II) and Os(III) species. Because the structural change during electron transfer is negligible, the reaction faces minimal energy barriers.

Additional features, such as the electronic compatibility due to similar configurations, promote faster electron transfers. This makes these reactions a central study topic for scientists exploring the kinetics of redox reactions.
Coordination Geometry
Coordination geometry refers to the spatial arrangement of ligands around a central metal atom in a complex. It's a cornerstone concept in understanding reactions involving metal complexes.

The geometry can drastically affect both the chemical and physical properties of the complex. For example, octahedral coordination, which is common in many transition metal complexes, allows for specific electronic configurations such as high-spin or low-spin states. These configurations influence how electrons are transferred and how reactive a complex might be.

Stability and reactivity of complexes are strongly tied to their geometry. For instance, during electron transfer processes, similar coordination geometries between reactants and products mean less structural reorganization is needed. This typically results in lower activation energies and thus faster reaction rates. Therefore, understanding coordination geometry helps predict and explain the behavior of metal complexes in various chemical reactions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Rationalize the formation of the products in the following sequence of reactions: \\[ \begin{aligned} \left[\operatorname{Rh}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)_{6}\right]^{3+} \frac{\mathrm{C}^{-}}{-\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}}-\left[\operatorname{Rh} \mathrm{Cl}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)_{5}\right]^{2+} & \\ & \frac{\mathrm{C}^{-}}{-\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}}-\operatorname{trans}-\left[\mathrm{RhCl}_{2}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)_{4}\right]^{+} \\\ & \frac{\mathrm{C}^{+}}{-\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}^{-} \operatorname{mer} \cdot\left[\mathrm{RhCl}_{3}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)_{3}\right]} \\ & \frac{\mathrm{C}^{-}}{-\mathrm{H}_{2} 0}-\operatorname{trans}-\left[\mathrm{RhCl}_{4}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)_{2}\right]^{-} \end{aligned} \\] (b) Suggest methods of preparing \(\left[\mathrm{RhCl}_{5}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)\right]^{2-},\) cis\(\left[\mathrm{RhCl}_{4}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)_{2}\right]^{-}\) and \(f a c \cdot\left[\mathrm{RhCl}_{3}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)_{3}\right]\)

Consider the following reaction that takes place in aqueous solution; \(\mathrm{L}, \mathrm{X}\) and \(\mathrm{Y}\) are general ligands. \(\mathrm{Co}^{\mathrm{III}} \mathrm{L}_{5} \mathrm{X}+\mathrm{Y}--\mathrm{Co}^{\mathrm{III}} \mathrm{L}_{5} \mathrm{Y}+\mathrm{X}\) Discuss the possible competing pathways that exist and the factors that favour one pathway over another. Write a rate equation that takes into account the pathways that you discuss.

The rate of racemization of \(\left[\mathrm{CoL}_{1}\right]\) where \(\mathrm{HL}=26.11 \mathrm{a}\) is approximately the same as its rate of isomerization into \(\left[\mathrm{CoL}_{3}^{\prime}\right]\) where \(\mathrm{HL}^{+}=26.11 \mathrm{b} .\) What can you deduce about the mechanisms of these reactions?

The reaction: \(\left[\mathrm{Cr}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{5} \mathrm{Cl}\right]^{2+}+\mathrm{NH}_{3}-=\left[\mathrm{Cr}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{6}\right]^{3+}+\mathrm{Cl}^{-}\) in liquid \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) is catalysed by \(\mathrm{KNH}_{2}\), Suggest an explanation for this observation.

The rate constants for racemization \(\left(k_{r}\right)\) and dissociation \(\left(k_{d}\right)\) of \(\left[\mathrm{FeL}_{3}\right]^{4-}\left(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{L}=26.12\right)\) at several temperatures, \(T\) are given in the table. (a) Determine \(\Delta H^{\dagger}\) and \(\Delta S^{\dagger}\) for each reaction. (b) What can you deduce about the mechanism of racemization? $$\begin{array}{llllll} T / \mathrm{K} & 288 & 294 & 298 & 303 & 308 \\ k_{\mathrm{r}} \times 10^{5} / \mathrm{s}^{-1} & 0.5 & 1.0 & 2.7 & 7.6 & 13.4 \\\ k_{\mathrm{d}} \times 10^{5} / \mathrm{s}^{-1} & 0.5 & 1.0 & 2.8 & 7.7 & 14.0 \end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free