Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For which of the following ions would you expect the spin-only formula to give reasonable cstimates of the magnetic moment: (a) \(\left[\mathrm{Cr}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{6}\right]^{3+}\) (b) \(\left[\mathrm{V}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)_{6}\right]^{3+}\) (c) \(\left[\mathrm{CoF}_{6}\right]^{3-}\) ? Rationalize your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The spin-only formula gives reasonable estimates for \([\mathrm{Cr(NH}_3)_6]^{3+}\) and \([\mathrm{V(OH}_2)_6]^{3+}\), but not for \([\mathrm{CoF}_6]^{3-}\).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding spin-only formula

The spin-only formula for calculating the magnetic moment, \( \mu \), in units of Bohr magnetons (B.M.) is given by \( \mu = \sqrt{n(n+2)} \), where \( n \) is the number of unpaired electrons in the d-orbitals.
02

Calculating unpaired electrons for Cr

The ion \( [\mathrm{Cr(NH}_3)_6]^{3+} \) has a chromium ion in the +3 oxidation state, meaning it has \( [\mathrm{Ar}]~3d^3 \) configuration. There are 3 unpaired electrons, so using the formula: \( \mu = \sqrt{3(3+2)} = \sqrt{15} \).
03

Calculating unpaired electrons for V

The ion \( [\mathrm{V(OH}_2)_6]^{3+} \) has a vanadium ion in the +3 oxidation state, meaning it has \( [\mathrm{Ar}]~3d^2 \) configuration. There are 2 unpaired electrons, so using the formula: \( \mu = \sqrt{2(2+2)} = \sqrt{8} \).
04

Calculating unpaired electrons for Co

The ion \( [\mathrm{CoF}_6]^{3-} \) has a cobalt ion in the +3 oxidation state, meaning it has \( [\mathrm{Ar}]~3d^6 \) configuration. The strong field ligand F usually leads to pairing up of the electrons, leaving 1 unpaired electron. However, with a low-spin complex, we use 1 unpaired electron for estimation: \( \mu = \sqrt{1(1+2)} = \sqrt{3} \).
05

Assessing applicability of the spin-only formula

The spin-only formula gives good estimates when there is negligible contribution from orbital behavior. For high spin complexes without pairing influence like \( [\mathrm{Cr(NH}_3)_6]^{3+} \) and \( [\mathrm{V(OH}_2)_6]^{3+} \), it gives reasonable estimates. However, \( [\mathrm{CoF}_6]^{3-} \) can form a low-spin complex in the presence of strong field ligands, making the formula less applicable due to significant orbital contributions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Spin-Only Formula
The spin-only formula is a handy tool for estimating magnetic moments of transition metal ions. It's especially useful in predicting the magnetic properties of complexes. To arrive at the magnetic moment using this formula, you need to know the number of unpaired electrons in the d-orbitals of the metal ion. The formula is given by: \[ \mu = \sqrt{n(n+2)} \]where \( n \) is the number of unpaired electrons. The result is expressed in Bohr magnetons (B.M.). The spin-only formula tends to give more accurate estimates in cases where orbital contributions to the magnetic moment are minimal. This usually occurs in high-spin complexes where the energies of the d-orbitals closely align, preventing significant pairing. In these scenarios, the unpaired electrons dominate the magnetic behavior, making the spin-only calculation reliable. However, in low-spin complexes or cases where ligands induce significant d-orbital splitting and pairing, the orbital contribution can become significant, reducing the formula's reliability.
Unpaired Electrons
Unpaired electrons play a crucial role in determining the magnetic properties of transition metals and their complexes. These electrons, which do not have a partner to pair with in their atomic or molecular orbitals, are responsible for the magnetism observed in many compounds. In a transition metal complex, whether unpaired electrons exist depends on the electron configuration of the metal ion as well as the influence of surrounding ligands. For example:
  • In a high-spin complex, the energy difference between the d-orbitals is small, allowing electrons to remain unpaired to minimize repulsion.
  • In a low-spin complex, the significant energy gap leads to electron pairing within the lower-energy d-orbitals.
The count of unpaired electrons is extracted by examining the d-electron configuration of the metal ion and evaluating how they are influenced by the crystal field created by ligands. Calculating this helps us apply the spin-only formula, as it forms the very basis of the formula \( \mu = \sqrt{n(n+2)} \), where \( n \) represents the number of unpaired electrons.
Transition Metal Complexes
Transition metal complexes are fascinating chemical species composed of a central metal ion bound to surrounding molecules or ions called ligands. These ligands can significantly affect the properties of the metal ion, altering features such as color, reactivity, and magnetism. The d-orbitals of transition metals are particularly suited for forming bonds with ligands. These bonding interactions and the resultant splitting of the d-orbitals determine whether the complex is high-spin or low-spin, thus affecting the magnetic properties.
  • High-spin complexes occur when the crystal field splitting is small, leading to a greater number of unpaired electrons.
  • Low-spin complexes occur when the field splitting is large, resulting in more paired electrons due to occupation of lower energy levels first.
The nature of the ligands plays a critical role in this behavior. Strong field ligands, like cyanide or carbonyl, tend to cause greater splitting, often resulting in low-spin complexes. Conversely, weak field ligands, such as halides, allow for smaller splitting, typically resulting in high-spin complexes.
Oxidation State and Electron Configuration
The oxidation state and electron configuration are foundational concepts in understanding transition metal complexes. The oxidation state of a metal in a complex informs us of its electron count and ultimately its electronic behavior.Let's explore this further:
  • Oxidation state is the charge assigned to an atom in a molecule/ion, assuming that electrons shared in bonds are owned by the more electronegative atom. It helps us deduce the number of electrons lost to form the complex.
  • Electron configuration describes the distribution of electrons among the orbitals of an atom or ion. It provides insight into how many unpaired electrons are present, which influences magnetic properties and reactivity.
For instance, take the chromium ion \([\mathrm{Cr(NH}_3)_6]^{3+}\). Here, the +3 oxidation state indicates that chromium has lost three electrons, providing it with a \([\mathrm{Ar}]~3d^3\) configuration. From this, we derive that it has 3 unpaired electrons, crucial for calculating the magnetic moment using the spin-only formula.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Which of the following complexes would you expect to suffer from a Jahn- Teller distortion: \(\left[\mathrm{CrI}_{6}\right]^{4-}\) \(\left[\mathrm{Cr}(\mathrm{CN})_{6}\right]^{4-},\left[\mathrm{CoF}_{6}\right]^{3-}\) and \(\left[\mathrm{Mn}(\mathrm{ox})_{3}\right]^{3-} ?\) Give reasons for your answers. (b) \(\left[\mathrm{Et}_{4} \mathrm{N}\right]_{2}\left[\mathrm{NiBr}_{4}\right]\) is paramagnetic, but \(\mathrm{K}_{2}\left[\mathrm{PdBr}_{4}\right]\) is diamagnetic. Rationalize these observations. (c) Using a simple MO approach, explain what happens to the energies of the metal \(d\) orbitals on the formation of a \(\sigma\) -bonded complex such as \(\left[\mathrm{Ni}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{6}\right]^{2+}\).

Rationalize why the absorption spectrum of an aqueous solution of \(\left[\mathrm{Ti}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)_{6}\right]^{2+}\) (stable under acidic conditions) cxhibits two well-separated bands \((430 \text { and } 650 \mathrm{nm})\) assigned to "d-d' transitions, whereas that of an aqueous solution of \(\left[\mathrm{Ti}\left(\mathrm{OH}_{2}\right)_{6}\right]^{3+}\) consists of one absorption \(\left(\lambda_{\max }=490 \mathrm{nm}\right)\) with a shoulder \((580 \mathrm{nm})\).

Discuss each of the following observations: (a) The \(\left[\mathrm{CoCl}_{4}\right]^{2-}\) ion is a regular tetrahedron but \(\left[\mathrm{CuCl}_{4}\right]^{2-}\) has a flattened tetrahedral structure. (b) The electronic spectrum of \(\left[\mathrm{CoF}_{6}\right]^{3-}\) contains two bands with maxima at 11500 and \(14500 \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\).

The \(3 p^{2}\) configuration of an Si atom gives rise to the following terms: \(^{1} S_{0} .^{3} P_{2},^{3} P_{1},^{3} P_{0}\) and \(^{1} D_{2} .\) Use Hund's rules to predict the relative cnergies of these terms, giving an explanation for your answer.

Arrange the following ligands in order of increasing field strength: \(\mathrm{Br}^{-}, \mathrm{F}^{-},[\mathrm{CN}]^{-}, \mathrm{NH}_{3},[\mathrm{OH}]^{-}, \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free