Question

Which of the following reactions would give a better yield of \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OCH}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{2} ?\) Explain. \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{ONa}+\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{2} \mathrm{CHI} \longrightarrow \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OCH}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{2}+\mathrm{NaI}\) \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{2} \mathrm{CHONa}+\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{I} \longrightarrow \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OCH}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{2}+\mathrm{NaI}\)

Short answer

The reaction using sodium methoxide (\(CH_{3}ONa\)) and isopropyl iodide (\((CH_{3})_{2}CHI\)) would give a better yield of methoxyethane (\(CH_{3}OCH(CH_{3})_{2}\)). This is due to the stronger nucleophilic nature of the sodium methoxide, promoting a faster reaction rate and ultimately a higher yield.

Step-by-step solution

Analyze the Nature of Reactants in Each Reaction

Comparing the two reactions, it is observed that sodium methoxide (\(CH_{3}ONa\)) is a stronger nucleophile than sodium isopropoxide. Thus, the reaction with sodium methoxide as a reactant would be faster, increasing the yield.

Examine the Stability of Transition States

In the reaction with sodium isopropoxide, secondary carbocation (\( (CH_{3})_{2}CH^+\)) forms as an intermediate which is more stable than the primary carbocation (\(CH_{3}C^+\)) formed in the reaction with sodium methoxide. However, both reactions follow the SN2 mechanism, where reaction rate depends on the nucleophile and not on the stability of carbocations.

Assess the Nature of the Leaving Group

In both reactions, iodide ion (\(I^-\)) is the leaving group. Since the leaving group is the same in both cases, it does not affect the yield of the reactions.

Key concepts

Nucleophilicity in Organic Reactions

Understanding nucleophilicity is crucial when predicting the outcome of organic reactions, as it dictates how readily a nucleophile will donate a pair of electrons to form a new chemical bond. In organic chemistry, a nucleophile is a substance that is rich in electrons and seeks out electrophilic (electron-deficient) atoms.

Nucleophiles vary in strength based on several factors, such as charge, electronegativity, steric hindrance, and the solvent. Typically, a negatively charged nucleophile like sodium methoxide (CH_{3}ONa)) is more reactive than a neutral nucleophile due to its increased electron density.

In the reactions proposed in the exercise, sodium methoxide, being a negatively charged oxygen species, exhibits higher nucleophilicity compared to sodium isopropoxide. This higher nucleophilicity affords a better yield for its corresponding reaction by accelerating the rate at which the nucleophile attacks the electrophilic carbon of the alkyl halide, thereby forming the desired product more efficiently.

SN2 Mechanism

The SN2 mechanism is one of the two main types of nucleophilic substitution reactions in organic chemistry. The 'SN' stands for 'nucleophilic substitution', and the '2' signifies that the rate-determining step involves two reactants: the nucleophile and the substrate.

In an SN2 reaction, the nucleophile attacks the electrophilic carbon from the opposite side of the leaving group, leading to a backside attack. This occurs in one concerted step where the nucleophile bonds to the carbon at the same time as the leaving group departs. Therefore, the rate of an SN2 reaction is directly influenced by the strength of the nucleophile and the accessibility of the electrophilic carbon.

Factors Affecting SN2 Reactions

• Steric hindrance: Less hindered substrates react faster because the nucleophile can approach more easily.
• Leaving group ability: Better leaving groups facilitate the reaction by departing more readily.
• Solvent effects: Polar aprotic solvents often favor SN2 reactions by not solvating the nucleophile, increasing its reactivity.

In the exercise, the electrophile is an alkyl halide and the leaving group is the same (iodide ion) in both cases. Therefore, the difference in reaction yield is predominantly attributed to the strength of the nucleophiles.

Transition State Stability

The transition state of a chemical reaction represents a high-energy, unstable arrangement of atoms that occurs at the point of highest potential energy along the reaction pathway. It is a fleeting configuration that precedes the formation of the final products.

In the context of SN2 reactions, the stability of the transition state is not as significant as it is for SN1 reactions, which proceed through a carbocation intermediate. Instead, SN2 reactions involve a single concerted step without the formation of a stable intermediate. The transition state in an SN2 reaction involves both the nucleophile approaching and the leaving group departing.

Because SN2 reactions do not favor the formation of highly stable intermediates like carbocations, factors like steric hindrance and nucleophilicity carry more weight when determining the outcome of the reaction. As such, while the exercise mentions the relative stability of secondary versus primary carbocations, this does not influence the yield in an SN2 reaction. Instead, the reaction pathway's activation energy directly correlates with the likelihood of a successful reaction, with lower energy transition states being crossed more readily, leading to a more favorable yield.