Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Appendix E describes a useful study aid known as concept mapping. Using the methods presented in Appendix \(\mathrm{E},\) construct a concept map that links the various factors affecting the solubility of slightly soluble solutes.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A concept map can be constructed that links the various factors affecting the solubility of slightly soluble solutes by identifying the relevant concepts, arranging them in a hierarchy, connecting the concepts with lines, clarifying the type of relation through words on the arrow lines, using cross links to denote relationships across different sections of the map, and finally, revising the map for correctness and clear comprehension.

Step by step solution

01

Identification of Concepts

Identify and list all the factors that affect the solubility of slightly soluble solutes. Some of these factors could include temperature, pressure, nature of solute and solvent, presence of other substances etc.
02

Hierarchy of Concepts

Arrange these concepts in a hierarchical format. The most general, broad concepts will be at the top of the map while specific, less general concepts will be located at the bottom.
03

Connection of Concepts

Connect these concepts with arrows indicating the relationship between them. Use words on the arrow lines to clarify the type of relation.
04

Cross-Links

Other relationships across different sections of the concept map can be demonstrated using cross links. Thus, showing the association of a factor in one section of the map with another factor in a different section can help to explain how these factors can simultaneously affect solubility.
05

Review and Revise

Review the concept map once it is complete. Check the validity of connections and ensure that the map looks well-organized and easy to understand. Revise if necessary

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Concept Mapping
Understanding complex subjects like the solubility of slightly soluble solutes can be facilitated by utilizing an educational tool called 'concept mapping'. With concept mapping, students create visual diagrams that outline the relationships between various ideas. To start, a student would list out all relevant concepts such as temperature or pressure. These concepts are then structured hierarchically and connected through arrows or lines, often annotated to describe the nature of the connection.

For example, temperature might be linked to solubility with an arrow marked 'increases with' pointing from 'temperature' to 'solubility'. Concept maps offer a multi-dimensional view of information, which can reinforce learning and improve retention by organizing knowledge in an intuitive fashion.
Factors Affecting Solubility
Solubility, a measure of how well a solute can dissolve in a solvent, is influenced by various factors that can either increase or decrease the extent of solubilization. One of the key factors is temperature; typically, the solubility of solids in liquids increases with temperature. Additionally, pressure plays a role, especially for gases, where an increase in pressure can lead to increased solubility due to Henry's law.

Other factors include the nature of the solute and solvent — polar solvents like water are more likely to dissolve polar solutes — and the presence of other substances that can cause a common-ion effect or complexation that changes solubility. Understanding these aspects is crucial for grasping why certain substances dissolve to the extent that they do.
Hierarchical Organization in Learning
The hierarchical organization in learning is a framework for building knowledge by starting with broad, general concepts and progressively moving toward more specific, detailed information. This approach mirrors how a concept map is arranged, with overarching themes such as 'factors affecting solubility' at the top and specific instances and examples at the bottom.

Applying this method to chemistry education ensures that a student first understands the basic principles before delving into the complexities of solubility. For instance, one might first learn what solubility is before examining how temperature or pressure affects it. This strategy aids in creating structured knowledge foundations, allowing for better comprehension and the ability to apply information to different scenarios.
Chemistry Education Techniques
Effective chemistry education utilizes a combination of techniques to foster understanding and interest among students. Amongst these, interactive experiments, visual aids such as models and animations, and practical applications highlight the relevance of chemistry in everyday life. Employing diverse teaching methods, like discussions, lab work, and hands-on activities, caters to different learning styles.

Concept mapping is another technique, it allows students to graphically represent relationships in the material. Using real-world examples to explain abstract concepts, such as how ocean salinity influences water's freeze point, can also help students relate theoretical knowledge to their observations. All these techniques contribute to a comprehensive learning experience that emphasizes conceptual understanding over rote memorization.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If \(100.0 \mathrm{mL}\) of a clear saturated solution of \(\mathrm{Ag}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\) is added to \(250.0 \mathrm{mL}\) of a clear saturated solution of \(\mathrm{PbCrO}_{4},\) will any precipitate form? [Hint: Take into account the dilutions that occur. What are the possible precipitates?]

All but two of the following solutions yield a precipitate when the solution is also made \(2.00 \mathrm{M}\) in \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\). Those two are (a) \(\mathrm{MgCl}_{2}(\mathrm{aq}) ;\) (b) \(\mathrm{FeCl}_{3}(\mathrm{aq})\); (c) \(\left(\mathrm{NH}_{4}\right)_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}(\mathrm{aq}) ;(\mathrm{d}) \mathrm{Cu}\left(\mathrm{NO}_{3}\right)_{2}(\mathrm{aq})\); (e) \(\mathrm{Al}_{2}\left(\mathrm{SO}_{4}\right)_{3}(\mathrm{aq})\).

In the Mohr titration, \(\mathrm{Cl}^{-}(\mathrm{aq})\) is titrated with \(\mathrm{AgNO}_{3}(\text { aq })\) in solutions that are at about \(\mathrm{pH}=7\). Thus, it is suitable for determining the chloride ion content of drinking water. The indicator used in the titration is \(\mathrm{K}_{2} \mathrm{CrO}_{4}(\text { aq }) .\) A red-brown precipitate of \(\mathrm{Ag}_{2} \mathrm{CrO}_{4}(\mathrm{s})\) forms after all the \(\mathrm{Cl}^{-}\) has precipitated. The titration reaction is \(\mathrm{Ag}^{+}(\mathrm{aq})+\mathrm{Cl}^{-}(\mathrm{aq}) \longrightarrow \mathrm{AgCl}(\mathrm{s}) .\) At the equivalence point of the titration, the titration mixture consists of \(\mathrm{AgCl}(\mathrm{s})\) and a solution having neither \(\mathrm{Ag}^{+}\) nor \(\mathrm{Cl}^{-}\) in excess. Also, no \(\mathrm{Ag}_{2} \mathrm{CrO}_{4}(\mathrm{s})\) is present, but it forms immediately after the equivalence point. (a) How many milliliters of \(0.01000 \mathrm{M} \mathrm{AgNO}_{3}(\mathrm{aq})\) are required to titrate \(100.0 \mathrm{mL}\) of a municipal water sample having \(29.5 \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{Cl}^{-} / \mathrm{L} ?\) (b) What is \(\left[\mathrm{Ag}^{+}\right]\) at the equivalence point of the Mohr titration? (c) What is \(\left[\mathrm{CrO}_{4}^{2-}\right]\) in the titration mixture to meet the requirement of no precipitation of \(\mathrm{Ag}_{2} \mathrm{CrO}_{4}(\mathrm{s})\) until immediately after the equivalence point? (d) Describe the effect on the results of the titration if \(\left[\mathrm{CrO}_{4}^{2-}\right]\) were (1) greater than that calculated in part (c) or (2) less than that calculated? (e) Do you think the Mohr titration would work if the reactants were exchanged - that is, with \(\mathrm{Cl}^{-}(\text {aq })\) as the titrant and \(\mathrm{Ag}^{+}(\) aq) in the sample being analyzed? Explain.

Which of the following solids is (are) more soluble in an acidic solution than in pure water: \(\mathrm{KCl}\), \(\mathrm{MgCO}_{3}\), \(\mathrm{FeS}, \mathrm{Ca}(\mathrm{OH})_{2,}\) or \(\mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{5} \mathrm{COOH} ?\) Explain.

The following \(K_{\mathrm{sp}}\) values are found in a handbook. Write the solubility product expression to which each one applies. For example, \(K_{\mathrm{sp}}(\mathrm{AgCl})=\left[\mathrm{Ag}^{+}\right]\left[\mathrm{Cl}^{-}\right]=\) \(1.8 \times 10^{-10}\). (a) \(K_{\mathrm{sp}}\left(\mathrm{Cr} \mathrm{F}_{3}\right)=6.6 \times 10^{-11}\) (b) \(K_{\mathrm{sp}}\left[\mathrm{Au}_{2}\left(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{4}\right)_{3}\right]=1 \times 10^{-10}\) (c) \(K_{\mathrm{sp}}\left[\mathrm{Cd}_{3}\left(\mathrm{PO}_{4}\right)_{2}\right]=2.1 \times 10^{-33}\) (d) \(K_{\mathrm{sp}}\left(\mathrm{Sr} \mathrm{F}_{2}\right)=2.5 \times 10^{-9}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free