Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) Explain why \(\mathrm{BrF}_{4}^{-}\) is square planar, whereas \(\mathrm{BF}_{4}^{-}\) is tetrahedral. (b) How would you expect the \(\mathrm{H}-\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{H}\) bond angle to vary in the series \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}, \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{~S}, \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{Se}\) ? Explain. (Hint: The size of an electron pair domain depends in part on the electronegativity of the central atom.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) \(\mathrm{BrF}_{4}^{-}\) is square planar because there are 5 electron pair domains (4 bonding pairs and 1 lone pair) around the central Br atom, which adopts this geometry to minimize repulsion. In contrast, \(\mathrm{BF}_{4}^{-}\) is tetrahedral because it has 4 electron pair domains (4 bonding pairs) around the central B atom without any lone pairs. (b) The H-X-H bond angle in the series H2O, H2S, and H2Se decreases as the electronegativity of the central atom decreases. This leads to larger electron pair domain sizes and increased repulsion between lone pairs and bonding pairs, pushing the bonds closer together.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze \(\mathrm{BrF}_{4}^{-}\)

To analyze \(\mathrm{BrF}_{4}^{-}\), we first need to determine the number of valence electrons of all the atoms involved. Bromine has 7 valence electrons, each of the 4 fluorine atoms has 7, and there's an extra electron due to the -1 charge, giving us a total of 29 valence electrons. In the central atom (Br), we have a total of 5 electron pair domains (4 bonding pairs with F and 1 lone pair). According to the VSEPR theory, the molecular geometry that minimizes electron pair repulsion for 5 electron pair domains is the square pyramidal geometry. However, due to the presence of a lone pair, the molecule adopts a square planar geometry (lone pairs occupy more space than bonding pairs, and pushing the F atoms to be in the plane creates the necessary space).
02

Analyze \(\mathrm{BF}_{4}^{-}\)

To analyze \(\mathrm{BF}_{4}^{-}\), we first need to determine the number of valence electrons of all the atoms involved. Boron has 3 valence electrons, each of the 4 fluorine atoms has 7, and there's an extra electron due to the -1 charge, giving us a total of 32 valence electrons. In the central atom (B), we have a total of 4 electron pair domains (4 bonding pairs with F). According to the VSEPR theory, the molecular geometry that minimizes electron pair repulsion for 4 electron pair domains is the tetrahedral geometry. As there are no lone pairs, the molecule adopts this tetrahedral structure.
03

Compare \(\mathrm{BrF}_{4}^{-}\) and \(\mathrm{BF}_{4}^{-}\)

Given the analysis in Step 1 and Step 2, we have the following results: - \(\mathrm{BrF}_{4}^{-}\) has a square planar geometry due to the presence of a lone pair on the Br atom along with 4 bonding pairs. - \(\mathrm{BF}_{4}^{-}\) has a tetrahedral geometry due to the presence of 4 bonding pairs without any lone pairs.
04

Analyze the H-X-H bond angles

We are given H2O, H2S, and H2Se molecules, and asked to determine the H-X-H bond angle (X being O, S, or Se). In these molecules, the central atoms O, S and Se have two bonding pairs (H-X bonds) and two lone pairs. The general trend of electronegativity decreases from O to S to Se. As electronegativity decreases, the electron pair domain size increases, leading to a larger region of space occupied by lone pairs. As a result, the repulsion between lone pairs and bonding pairs will increase, pushing the bonding pairs closer together. This will cause the H-X-H bond angle to decrease. We can thus expect the bond angles to follow the trend: H2O > H2S > H2Se.
05

Summary

(a) \(\mathrm{BrF}_{4}^{-}\) is square planar because it has 4 bonding pairs and 1 lone pair, while \(\mathrm{BF}_{4}^{-}\) is tetrahedral due to its 4 bonding pairs without any lone pairs. (b) In the series H2O, H2S, and H2Se, the H-X-H bond angle decreases due to the decreasing electronegativity of the central atom, which results in larger electron pair domain size and increased repulsion between lone pairs and bonding pairs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

VSEPR Theory
The VSEPR (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion) Theory is a model used to predict the shape of molecules. It suggests that electron pairs around a central atom will arrange themselves as far apart as possible to minimize repulsion. This helps determine the molecular geometry.
1. VSEPR focuses on electron pair interactions. These include bonding pairs, which are electrons shared between atoms, and lone pairs, which are pairs of electrons that are not shared.
2. The shape of a molecule can vary significantly based on these electron pair interactions.
For example, in the case of \(\mathrm{BrF}_4^-\), there are four bonding pairs and one lone pair around bromine. The lone pair influences the arrangement due to its larger repulsion, leading to a square planar shape.
In contrast, \(\mathrm{BF}_4^-\) has four bonding pairs and no lone pair, which naturally forms a tetrahedral geometry because all electron pairs are shared, minimizing repulsion evenly across the space.
Lone Pairs
Lone pairs are the electron pairs that do not participate in bonding. They hold great significance in determining molecular shape due to their strong repulsive force.
  • Lone pairs require more space than bonding pairs because they are only attracted to one nucleus rather than two.
  • In molecules like \(\mathrm{BrF}_4^-\), the presence of a lone pair on bromine causes distortion in shape, resulting in a square planar geometry. This occurs because the lone pair forces the bonding pairs into the same plane to reduce overall electron repulsion.
  • When comparing \(\mathrm{BrF}_4^-\) with \(\mathrm{BF}_4^-\), the absence of lone pairs in \(\mathrm{BF}_4^-\) leads to a typical tetrahedral shape, as all electron clouds are uniformly spaced.
Lone pairs also influence bond angles, as seen in molecules like water, where the angle between bonds is smaller than in a regular tetrahedron due to the compression caused by lone pairs.
Bond Angles
Bond angles are the angles between two adjacent bonds at an atom. They are crucial for defining the geometry of the molecule and are directly influenced by the presence of lone pairs and the types of atoms involved.
When examining bond angles in molecules such as H\(_2\)O, H\(_2\)S, and H\(_2\)Se, one can see a trend. As we move from H\(_2\)O to H\(_2\)Se:
  • The central atom's electronegativity decreases (oxygen to selenium).
  • Larger electron pair domains form, increasing lone pair repulsions.
This leads to a decrease in the H-X-H bond angle as the central atoms become less electronegative.
In H\(_2\)O, the high electronegativity of oxygen means stronger attraction for bonding electrons, resulting in a more closed bond angle. However, in H\(_2\)Se, the weaker pull by selenium allows the lone pairs to push the bonded electrons closer together, further reducing the bond angle. This demonstrates how bond angles can vary based on changes in atomic characteristics and electron arrangements.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Would you expect the nonbonding electron-pair domain in \(\mathrm{NCl}_{3}\) to be greater or smaller in size than the corresponding one in \(\mathrm{PCl}_{3} ?\)

(a) Write a single Lewis structure for \(\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O},\) and determine the hybridization of the central \(\mathrm{N}\) atom. (b) Are there other possible Lewis structures for the molecule? (c) Would you expect \(\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}\) to exhibit delocalized \(\pi\) bonding?

(a) Using only the valence atomic orbitals of a hydrogen atom and a fluorine atom, and following the model of Figure 9.46 , how many MOs would you expect for the HF molecule? (b) How many of the MOs from part (a) would be occupied by electrons? (c) It turns out that the difference in energies between the valence atomic orbitals of \(\mathrm{H}\) and \(\mathrm{F}\) are sufficiently different that we can neglect the interaction of the 1 s orbital of hydrogen with the 2 s orbital of fluorine. The 1 s orbital of hydrogen will mix only with one \(2 p\) orbital of fluorine. Draw pictures showing the proper orientation of all three \(2 p\) orbitals on F interacting with a 1 sorbital on \(\mathrm{H}\). Which of the \(2 p\) orbitals can actually make a bond with a 1 s orbital, assuming that the atoms lie on the \(z\) -axis? (d) In the most accepted picture of HF, all the other atomic orbitals on fluorine move over at the same energy into the molecular orbital energy-level diagram for HE. These are called "nonbonding orbitals." Sketch the energy- level diagram for HF using this information and calculate the bond order. (Nonbonding electrons do not contribute to bond order.) \((\mathbf{e})\) Look at the Lewis structure for HE. Where are the nonbonding electrons?

Sulfur tetrafluoride \(\left(\mathrm{SF}_{4}\right)\) reacts slowly with \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) to form sulfur tetrafluoride monoxide (OSF_4) according to the following unbalanced reaction: $$ \mathrm{SF}_{4}(g)+\mathrm{O}_{2}(g) \longrightarrow \operatorname{OSF}_{4}(g) $$ The \(O\) atom and the four \(\mathrm{F}\) atoms in \(\mathrm{OSF}_{4}\) are bonded to a central S atom. (a) Balance the equation. (b) Write a Lewis structure of \(\mathrm{OSF}_{4}\) in which the formal charges of all atoms are zero. (c) Use average bond enthalpies (Table 8.3) to estimate the enthalpy of the reaction. Is it endothermic or exothermic? (d) Determine the electron-domain geometry of OSF \(_{4}\), and write two possible molecular geometries for the molecule based on this electron-domain geometry. (e) For each of the molecules you drew in part (d), state how many fluorines are equatorial and how many are axial.

Consider the \(\mathrm{H}_{2}^{+}\) ion. (a) Sketch the molecular orbitals of the ion and draw its energy-level diagram. (b) How many electrons are there in the \(\mathrm{H}_{2}^{+}\) ion? (c) Write the electron configuration of the ion in terms of its MOs. (d) What is the bond order in \(\mathrm{H}_{2}^{+}\) ? (e) Suppose that the ion is excited by light so that an electron moves from a lower-energy to a higher- energy MO. Would you expect the excited-state \(\mathrm{H}_{2}^{+}\) ion to be stable or to fall apart? (f) Which of the following statements about part (e) is correct: (i) The light excites an electron from a bonding orbital to an antibonding orbital, (ii) The light excites an electron from an antibonding orbital to a bonding orbital, or (iii) In the excited state there are more bonding electrons than antibonding electrons?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free