Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As discussed in the A Closer Look box on "Measurement and the Uncertainty Principle," the essence of the uncertainty principle is that we can't make a measurement without disturbing the system that we are measuring. (a) Why can't we measure the position of a subatomic particle without disturbing it? (b) How is this concept related to the paradox discussed in the Closer Look box on "Thought Experiments and Schrödinger's Cat"?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) We can't measure the position of a subatomic particle without disturbing it because the probe (like light or other particles) used for measurement interacts with the particle, causing it to change its position and momentum. This embodies the uncertainty principle described by Heisenberg. (b) The uncertainty principle relates to Schrödinger's cat thought experiment, as both involve the effect of measurement on a system's state. In the Schrödinger's cat experiment, the cat is both alive and dead until someone observes it, demonstrating that measurement affects the observed system. Similarly, we can't measure a subatomic particle's position without altering its state, as outlined in part (a).

Step by step solution

01

Part (a): Measure the position of a subatomic particle

To measure the position of a subatomic particle, we need to use some kind of probe, like light or other particles. When we do this, the probe interacts with the subatomic particle which results in a disturbance to the system. In other words, the act of measuring the position changes the particle's position, and even its momentum. This is the essence of the uncertainty principle described by Heisenberg.
02

Part (b): Connection to Schrödinger's cat thought experiment

Schrödinger's cat thought experiment illustrates the concept of measurement in quantum mechanics. In this experiment, a cat is placed in a box containing a radioactive atom, a Geiger counter, a vial of poison, and a hammer. If the Geiger counter detects the decay of the radioactive atom, it triggers the release of poison, killing the cat. According to quantum mechanics, the radioactive atom is in a superposition state of decayed and not decayed until it is measured or observed. The connection to the uncertainty principle is that the act of observing or measuring the system (in this case, the cat in the box) affects the system's state. In the thought experiment, the cat is both alive and dead until the box is opened, and the observer measures the state. This illustrates the paradox of measurement in quantum mechanics: until a system is measured, it exists in multiple states simultaneously. Similarly, we cannot measure a subatomic particle's position without disturbing its state, as explained in part (a).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Quantum Mechanics: The Wonderland of the Tiny
Quantum mechanics is a fascinating branch of physics that explores the peculiar behaviors of particles at the atomic and subatomic levels. Unlike classical physics, which can predict the path of a baseball with certainty, quantum mechanics deals with probabilities and uncertainties.
  • At the heart of quantum mechanics is the concept that particles don't have definite positions or velocities until they are measured.
  • Particles exist in a superposition of states, meaning they can be in multiple places or have multiple speeds simultaneously.
  • This is very different from anything we experience in our everyday lives, where objects appear solid and predictable.
To explore these strange effects, scientists conceptualize the behavior of particles and waves in terms of wave functions. A wave function is a mathematical description of the quantum state of a system, representing the probabilities of finding a particle in various positions or states.
As we dive deeper into quantum mechanics, terms like "wave-particle duality" emerge. This suggests that light and matter exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties, depending on how they're observed. Such dualities and probabilities are what make quantum mechanics a mysterious yet eye-opening field of study.
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle: The Limits of Precision
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is a core concept in quantum mechanics that puts a fundamental limit on how accurately we can know certain pairs of properties about a particle, such as position and momentum. Named after Werner Heisenberg, this principle highlights how measurement disturbances can't be avoided.
When you try to measure the exact position of a subatomic particle like an electron, you must interact with it, often by shining light on it. However, the photons (light particles) disturb the electron, altering its position or its momentum.
  • This principle implies that the more precisely we know a particle’s position, the less precisely we can know its momentum, and vice versa. Mathematically, this is represented as \[ \Delta x \cdot \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2} \ \] where \( \Delta x \) is the uncertainty in position, \( \Delta p \) is the uncertainty in momentum, and \( \hbar \) is the reduced Planck's constant.
  • It reminds us of the limits of what can be known, providing a fundamental boundary to the precision of our measurements and knowledge in the quantum world.
Ultimately, the uncertainty principle doesn’t mean we just need better technology to make precise measurements: it represents an inherent property of the universe itself.
Schrödinger's Cat: The Quantum Paradox
Schrödinger's Cat is a famous thought experiment proposed by Erwin Schrödinger to illustrate the counterintuitive nature of quantum mechanics. It serves as a compelling example of how quantum phenomena differ sharply from what we perceive in our daily lives.
In this thought experiment, a cat is placed in a sealed box along with a radioactive atom, a Geiger counter, a vial of poison, and a hammer. If the atom decays—an event that's random and can't be predicted—the Geiger counter detects it, causing the hammer to break the vial of poison, which would kill the cat.
  • According to quantum mechanics, until we open the box to observe the cat, it's considered both alive and dead, existing in a superposition of states.
  • The act of opening the box and checking on the cat forces the system to "choose" a state, collapsing the wave function to one where the atom has either decayed or not.
The thought experiment illustrates the peculiar nature of quantum measurement and challenges our classical intuitions. It's deeply connected to the uncertainty principle in showing how observation affects the system being observed, reinforcing the idea that reality isn't always as we perceive it.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For orbitals that are symmetric but not spherical, the contour representations (as in Figures 6.23 and 6.24 ) suggest where nodal planes exist (that is, where the electron density is zero). For example, the \(p_{x}\) orbital has a node wherever \(x=0\). This equation is satisfied by all points on the \(y z\) plane, so this plane is called a nodal plane of the \(p_{x}\) orbital. (a) Determine the nodal plane of the \(p_{z}\) orbital. (b) What are the two nodal planes of the \(d_{x y}\) orbital? (c) What are the two nodal planes of the \(d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}\) orbital?

The discovery of hafnium, element number \(72,\) provided a controversial episode in chemistry. G. Urbain, a French chemist, claimed in 1911 to have isolated an element number 72 from a sample of rare earth (elements \(58-71\) ) compounds. However, Niels Bohr believed that hafnium was more likely to be found along with zirconium than with the rare earths. D. Coster and G. von Hevesy, working in Bohr's laboratory in Copenhagen, showed in 1922 that element 72 was present in a sample of Norwegian zircon, an ore of zirconium. (The name hafnium comes from the Latin name for Copenhagen, Hafnia). (a) How would you use electron configuration arguments to justify Bohr's prediction? (b) Zirconium, hafnium's neighbor in group \(4 \mathrm{~B}\), can be produced as a metal by reduction of solid \(\mathrm{ZrCl}_{4}\) with molten sodium metal. Write a balanced chemical equation for the reaction. Is this an oxidation- reduction reaction? If yes, what is reduced and what is oxidized? (c) Solid zirconium dioxide, \(\mathrm{ZrO}_{2}\), reacts with chlorine gas in the presence of carbon. The products of the reaction are \(\mathrm{ZrCl}_{4}\) and two gases, \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{CO}\) in the ratio \(1: 2 .\) Write a balanced chemical equation for the reaction. Starting with a \(55.4-\mathrm{g}\) sample of \(\mathrm{ZrO}_{2}\), calculate the mass of \(\mathrm{ZrCl}_{4}\) formed, assuming that \(\mathrm{ZrO}_{2}\) is the limiting reagent and assuming \(100 \%\) yield. (d) Using their electron configurations, account for the fact that \(\mathrm{Zr}\) and Hf form chlorides \(\mathrm{MCl}_{4}\) and oxides \(\mathrm{MO}_{2}\).

Use the de Broglie relationship to determine the wavelengths of the following objects: (a) an \(85-\mathrm{kg}\) person skiing at \(50 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{hr},(\mathbf{b})\) a \(10.0-\mathrm{g}\) bullet fired at \(250 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s},(\mathbf{c})\) a lithium atom moving at \(2.5 \times 10^{5} \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s},(\mathbf{d})\) an ozone \(\left(\mathrm{O}_{3}\right)\) molecule in the upper atmosphere moving at \(550 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\).

Write the condensed electron configurations for the following atoms, using the appropriate noble-gas core abbreviations: \((\mathbf{a}) \mathrm{Cs},(\mathbf{b}) \mathrm{Ni},(\mathbf{c}) \mathrm{Se},(\mathbf{d}) \mathrm{Cd},(\mathbf{e}) \mathrm{U},(\mathbf{f}) \mathrm{Pb} .\)

Arrange the following kinds of electromagnetic radiation in order of increasing wavelength: infrared, green light, red light, radio waves, X rays, ultraviolet light.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free