Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Despite the similarities in the chemical reactivity of elements in the lanthanide series, their abundances in Earth's crust vary by two orders of magnitude. This graph shows the relative abundance as a function of atomic number. Which of the following statements best explains the sawtooth variation across the series? (a) The elements with an odd atomic number lie above the belt of stability. (b) The elements with an odd atomic number lie below the belt of stability. (c) The elements with an even atomic number have a magic number of protons. (d) Pairs of protons have a special stability.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correct statement that best explains the sawtooth variation in the relative abundance of elements in the Lanthanide series is (d) Pairs of protons have a special stability.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the belt of stability

The belt of stability is an area on a graph that represents where stable nuclei exist. It represents combinations of protons and neutrons for which the nuclei are stable. Stable nuclei generally have more neutrons than protons.
02

Consider the concept of magic numbers

In nuclear physics, magic numbers are the number of protons or neutrons (separately) that give rise to stable nuclei. They are the closed-shell configurations, meaning the corresponding energy levels are fully occupied, making it more stable.
03

Consider the concept of pairs of protons

Pairs of protons in a nucleus are often more stable due to the strong nuclear force. They can be part of a spin-coupled pair, which is more stable than single particles within the atomic nucleus.
04

Evaluate each statement

(a) Elements with an odd atomic number lie above the belt of stability. - The elements with an odd atomic number can lie either above or below the belt of stability, so this statement is not necessarily correct. (b) Elements with an odd atomic number lie below the belt of stability. - Same as for option (a), so it is also not correct. (c) Elements with an even atomic number have a magic number of protons. - Having an even atomic number doesn't automatically mean there is a magic number of protons. Magic numbers are specific for particular values of atomic numbers, which may not cover the entire even atomic numbers. Therefore, this statement is not correct. (d) Pairs of protons have a special stability. - This statement is true, and the stable nature of pairings of protons and neutrons can explain the variation in the relative abundance of elements in the Lanthanide series.
05

Choose the correct statement

Based on the analysis of each statement, we can conclude that the correct statement is (d) Pairs of protons have a special stability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Belt of Stability
The belt of stability is a concept used in nuclear physics to understand why certain atomic nuclei are stable, while others are prone to decay. This 'belt' appears on a graph of neutron number versus proton number for various nuclides. Within this belt, you will find nuclei that are naturally stable.
  • Nuclei located on the belt of stability have a balanced ratio of protons to neutrons.
  • Too many or too few neutrons compared to protons will make a nucleus unstable.
  • Stable nuclei generally have more neutrons than protons, especially as the atomic number increases.
As you move away from the belt, nuclei tend to become radioactive and decay into more stable forms over time. This concept helps in understanding why some elements feature more variability in their abundance and stability than others in natural settings.
Magic Numbers
Magic numbers are specific numbers of protons or neutrons that result in a very stable atomic nucleus. Common magic numbers are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126.
  • Nuclei with magic numbers tend to be much more stable because they represent complete proton or neutron energy levels, almost like a full set of orbitals in atomic theory.
  • This stability makes nuclei with magic numbers less likely to undergo radioactive decay.
  • They offer an additional layer of stability beyond what is offered by just pairing particles.
Understanding magic numbers can help explain why some elements in the lanthanide series exhibit significant relative abundance fluctuations, as those with nuclei closer to magic numbers are naturally more abundant due to their increased stability.
Proton Pairs Stability
The phenomena of proton pairing is crucial to understanding why some atomic nuclei are more stable than others. Proton pairs contribute to nuclear stability in a manner similar to electron pairing in chemical bonding.
  • Protons in pairs are subject to lower nuclear energy levels, benefitting from mutual attraction caused by the strong nuclear force.
  • This pairing reduces the potential for nuclear decay, as paired nuclei are more 'settled' than their unpaired counterparts.
  • The concept helps to explain the sawtooth pattern of elemental abundance in the lanthanide series; even elements have complete proton pairs, which generally possess more stability compared to odd ones.
All these properties shed light on why pairs of protons and their impact are integral to figuring out relative element abundance in the lanthanides.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

It takes 180 minutes for a 200 -mg sample of an unknown radioactive substance to decay to \(112 \mathrm{mg}\). What is the halflife of this substance?

Which of the following statements about the uranium used in nuclear reactors is or are true? (i) Natural uranium has too little \({ }^{235} \mathrm{U}\) to be used as a fuel. (ii) \({ }^{238} \mathrm{U}\) cannot be used as a fuel because it forms a supercritical mass too easily. (iii) To be used as fuel, uranium must be enriched so that it is more than \(50 \%^{235} \mathrm{U}\) in composition. (iv) The neutron-induced fission of \({ }^{235} \mathrm{U}\) releases more neutrons per nucleus than fission of \({ }^{238} \mathrm{U}\)

Iodine-131 is a convenient radioisotope to monitor thyroid activity in humans. It is a beta emitter with a half-life of 8.02 days. The thyroid is the only gland in the body that uses iodine. A person undergoing a test of thyroid activity drinks a solution of NaI, in which only a small fraction of the iodide is radioactive. (a) Why is NaI a good choice for the source of iodine? (b) If a Geiger counter is placed near the person's thyroid (which is near the neck) right after the sodium iodide solution is taken, what will the data look like as a function of time? (c) A normal thyroid will take up about \(12 \%\) of the ingested iodide in a few hours. How long will it take for the radioactive iodide taken up and held by the thyroid to decay to \(0.01 \%\) of the original amount?

Iodine-131 is used as a nuclear medicine to treat hyperthyroidism. The half- life of \({ }^{131} \mathrm{I}\) is 8.04 days. How long will it take for a \(500 \mathrm{mg}\) sample of \({ }^{131} \mathrm{I}\) to decay into \(1 \%\) of its original mass?

Hydroxyl radicals can pluck hydrogen atoms from molecules ("hydrogen abstraction"), and hydroxide ions can pluck protons from molecules ("deprotonation"). Write the reaction equations and Lewis dot structures for the hydrogen abstraction and deprotonation reactions for the generic carboxylic acid \(\mathrm{R}-\mathrm{COOH}\) with hydroxyl radical and hydroxide ion, respectively. Why is hydroxyl radical more toxic to living systems than hydroxide ion?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free