Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What properties of CFCs make them ideal for various commercial applications but also make them a long-term problem in the stratosphere?

Short Answer

Expert verified
CFCs, or chlorofluorocarbons, are ideal for various commercial applications due to their low reactivity, non-toxicity, non-flammability, and high heat absorption capacity. These properties make them suitable for use in refrigeration, insulation, and propellants in aerosol products. However, their long atmospheric lifetime allows them to reach the stratosphere, where they break down due to UV radiation and release chlorine atoms. These chlorine atoms react with and deplete the ozone layer, allowing more harmful UV radiation to reach Earth's surface.

Step by step solution

01

Properties of CFCs and their commercial applications

CFCs, which are organic compounds containing carbon, fluorine, and chlorine, exhibit several important properties that make them ideal for a variety of commercial applications. These properties include: 1. Low reactivity: CFCs are chemically stable compounds, which means they are less likely to break down or react with other substances. This stability makes them suitable for use as refrigerants, propellants in aerosol products, and insulation foams. 2. Non-toxicity: CFCs are generally non-toxic to humans, so they can be used safely in commercial applications. 3. Non-flammability: CFCs are non-flammable, which makes them safer to use in applications such as refrigeration and insulation. 4. High heat absorption capacity: CFCs have the ability to absorb significant amounts of heat, which makes them effective as refrigerants in air conditioning systems and other cooling applications.
02

CFCs and their impact on the stratosphere

Despite their usefulness in various commercial applications, CFCs have a significant negative impact on the stratosphere, primarily due to their role in the depletion of the ozone layer. The following factors contribute to this problem: 1. Long atmospheric lifetime: Due to their chemical stability, CFCs can persist in the atmosphere for decades or even centuries. This long lifetime allows them to reach the stratosphere by slow diffusion, where they can cause damage to the ozone layer. 2. Release of chlorine atoms: Once in the stratosphere, CFCs are broken down by ultraviolet (UV) radiation, releasing chlorine atoms. These chlorine atoms react with ozone molecules, leading to a chain reaction that depletes the ozone layer at an alarming rate. 3. Ozone depletion: The ozone layer is essential for protecting Earth's surface from harmful UV radiation. As the ozone layer is depleted by the presence of CFCs, more UV radiation can reach the Earth's surface, leading to increased risks for human health, such as skin cancer, and damage to ecosystems. Due to the environmental concerns associated with CFCs, their production and use have been phased out under the Montreal Protocol, an international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer. Alternatives to CFCs, such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), are currently used in many applications, although some of these alternatives may also have negative environmental impacts.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ozone Layer Depletion
CFCs, or chlorofluorocarbons, were once widely used in industry due to their beneficial properties. Unfortunately, they play a major role in ozone layer depletion. The ozone layer, a protective barrier in Earth's stratosphere, absorbs most of the Sun's harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Without it, life as we know it would be at risk. Yet, the chemical stability that makes CFCs useful in many applications allows them to last exceedingly long in the atmosphere.
Once they make their way to the stratosphere, UV radiation breaks them down, releasing chlorine atoms. Each chlorine atom can destroy thousands of ozone molecules in a destructive chain reaction. This thinning of the ozone means more UV rays can penetrate, increasing risks like skin cancer and cataracts in humans, alongside detrimental effects on wildlife and the environment.
The recognition of this threat is what led to the significant reduction or complete ban of CFCs, thanks to the Montreal Protocol, a global agreement among nations focused on healing the ozone layer to safeguard our planet’s inhabitants.
Atmospheric Chemical Stability
A key aspect of CFCs is their chemical stability. This property derives from the strong bonds between their carbon, fluorine, and chlorine atoms. Such stability makes them unlikely to react with other compounds under normal conditions. Because of their intricate chemical structure, they are fantastic for prolonged uses in everyday products like refrigerators and air conditioners, where breakdown over time would be detrimental.
However, this same stability becomes a problem in the higher reaches of the atmosphere. Here, under the influence of intense UV radiation, these CFC molecules finally break apart to release chlorine. This is how they contribute to ozone layer depletion, since the chlorine atoms engage in reactions that significantly reduce ozone concentration. Typically, this wouldn't occur in Earth's lower atmosphere due to the lack of sufficient UV radiation to trigger such reactions.
Thus, while CFCs' chemical stability is advantageous for industrial use, it is a long-term threat to our atmosphere, contributing to serious environmental issues that affect all life on Earth.
Environmental Impact of Refrigerants
The environmental impact of refrigerants like CFCs is a significant consideration today. Initially, CFCs were celebrated for their efficiency and safety. They are non-toxic, non-flammable, and have a high capacity to absorb and transfer heat. This made them ideal for use in cooling systems, such as air conditioners and refrigerators.
Despite these applications, the repercussions for the environment became apparent with ozone depletion consequences. The widespread realization that CFCs were harming the ozone layer prompted the phase-out of these substances. Yet, finding alternatives proved challenging. Substitutes like HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons) and HCFCs (hydrochlorofluorocarbons) came into use, each with their own environmental footprints.
Although they do not deplete ozone to the extent of CFCs, many replacements have substantial global warming potentials, exacerbating another environmental concern: climate change. The ongoing quest balances finding refrigerants that perform well while presenting minimal risk to the planet's ecosystems and climate.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) What is the difference between chlorofluorocarbons and hydrofluorocarbons? (b) Why are hydrofluorocarbons potentially less harmful to the ozone layer than CFCs?

If an average \(\mathrm{O}_{3}\), molecule "lives" only \(100-200\) seconds in the stratosphere before undergoing dissociation, how can \(\mathrm{O}_{3}\) offer any protection from ultraviolet radiation?

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established air quality standards. For ozone \(\left(\mathrm{O}_{3}\right),\) the 8 -hour average concentration permitted under the standards is 0.085 parts per million (ppm). (a) Calculate the partial pressure of ozone at 0.085 ppm if the atmospheric pressure is \(100 \mathrm{kPa}\). (b) How many ozone molecules are in \(1.0 \mathrm{~L}\) of air? Assume \(T=25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\).

The standard enthalpies of formation of \(\mathrm{ClO}\) and \(\mathrm{ClO}_{2}\) are 101 and \(102 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{mol}\), respectively. Using these data and the thermodynamic data in Appendix C, calculate the overall enthalpy change for each step in the following catalytic cycle: $$ \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{ClO}(g)+\mathrm{O}_{3}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{ClO}_{2}(g)+\mathrm{O}_{2}(g) \\ \mathrm{ClO}_{2}(g)+\mathrm{O}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{ClO}(g)+\mathrm{O}_{2}(g) \end{array} $$ What is the enthalpy change for the overall reaction that results from these two steps?

Which of the following reactions in the stratosphere cause an increase in temperature there? (a) \(\mathrm{O}(g)+\mathrm{O}_{2}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{O}_{3}^{*}(g)\) (b) \(\mathrm{O}_{3}^{*}(g)+\mathrm{M}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{O}_{3}(g)+\mathrm{M}^{*}(g)\) (c) \(\mathrm{O}_{2}(g)+h \nu \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{O}(g)\) (d) \(\mathrm{O}(g)+\mathrm{N}_{2}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{NO}(g)+\mathrm{N}(g)\) (e) All of the above

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free