Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Arrange the bonds in each of the following sets in order of increasing polarity: (a) \(\mathrm{C}-\mathrm{F}, \mathrm{O}-\mathrm{F}, \mathrm{Be}-\mathrm{F}\) (b) \(\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{Cl}, \mathrm{S}-\mathrm{Br}, \mathrm{C}-\mathrm{P}\) (c) \(\mathrm{C}-\mathrm{S}, \mathrm{B}-\mathrm{F}, \mathrm{N}-\mathrm{O}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sets of bonds in order of increasing polarity are: (a) O-F, C-F, Be-F (b) O-Cl, C-P, S-Br (c) C-S, N-O, B-F

Step by step solution

01

Find electronegativity values

Refer to a periodic table or electronegativity table to find the electronegativity values of the elements in the given bonds. Element | Electronegativity ---------|------------------- C | 2.55 F | 3.98 O | 3.44 Be | 1.57 Cl | 3.16 S | 2.58 Br | 2.96 P | 2.19 B | 2.04 N | 3.04
02

Calculate electronegativity differences

Subtract the smaller electronegativity value from the larger one for each bond to obtain the electronegativity difference. (a) C-F: \(3.98 - 2.55 = 1.43\) O-F: \(3.98 - 3.44 = 0.54\) Be-F: \(3.98 - 1.57 = 2.41\) (b) O-Cl: \(3.44 - 3.16 = 0.28\) S-Br: \(2.96 - 2.58 = 0.38\) C-P: \(2.55 - 2.19 = 0.36\) (c) C-S: \(2.58 - 2.55 = 0.03\) B-F: \(3.98 - 2.04 = 1.94\) N-O: \(3.44 - 3.04 = 0.40\)
03

Arrange bonds in order of increasing polarity

Rank the bonds within each set based on their electronegativity differences. (a) O-F: 0.54 C-F: 1.43 Be-F: 2.41 (b) O-Cl: 0.28 C-P: 0.36 S-Br: 0.38 (c) C-S: 0.03 N-O: 0.40 B-F: 1.94 The sets of bonds in order of increasing polarity are: (a) O-F, C-F, Be-F (b) O-Cl, C-P, S-Br (c) C-S, N-O, B-F

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Electronegativity
Electronegativity is a fundamental concept in chemistry that describes an atom's tendency to attract and hold onto electrons when forming a chemical bond. It's a numerical value that varies across different elements and plays a vital role in determining the type of bond—ionic, covalent, or polar covalent—that can form between atoms.

The most commonly used scale for electronegativity is the Pauling scale, devised by chemist Linus Pauling. On this scale, fluorine (F) is assigned the highest value of 3.98, reflecting its strong pull on electrons, while elements such as francium (Fr) have one of the lowest due to their weak attraction for electrons.

The concept of electronegativity can be used to predict bond polarity. When two atoms form a bond, the difference in their electronegativities will determine the distribution of electrons. If the difference is large, the bond is considered ionic with one atom donating and the other accepting electrons. If the difference is small, the bond is nonpolar covalent, meaning the electrons are shared equally. Between these extremes lies polar covalent bonds, where electrons are shared unequally, leading to partial charges on the atoms.
Bond Polarity Ranking
Bond polarity ranking involves comparing the polarity of different chemical bonds within a set. To accurately rank the polarity of bonds, one must first calculate the electronegativity difference between the bonded atoms. The greater the difference, the more polar the bond is.

When assessing polarity, it's crucial to recognize that a completely nonpolar bond would have an electronegativity difference of zero, as is nearly the case with identical atoms (like O2 or N2). For partially polar bonds, the differences in electronegativity will typically range from about 0.1 to 1.7. Beyond this range, if the electronegativity difference exceeds about 1.7, the bond is likely to be ionic rather than covalent.

In the exercise example given, we arrange the bonds from least to most polar based on their calculated electronegativity differences. However, it's important to understand that this difference only provides initial guidance. Other factors, such as bond length and molecular geometry, can also influence the actual bond polarity in a complex molecule.
Periodic Table
The periodic table is not just a tabular display of chemical elements; it's a powerful tool that reflects the systematic trends in properties like electronegativity. These trends can be observed in different directions of the table.

Electronegativity increases across a period from left to right due to the increased nuclear charge, which pulls electrons closer to the nucleus, and decreases down a group as atomic size increases, making the outer electrons farther from the nucleus and less tightly held.

This pattern is why elements on the right side of the periodic table, except for the noble gases, generally have higher electronegativities than those on the left. Thus, when looking at the periodic table to assess bond polarity, we can often make predictions about bond polarity just based on element positions. For instance, bonds between elements far apart in the periodic table (such as metals on the left and non-metals on the right) are likely to be more polar due to greater differences in electronegativity.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Write one or more appropriate Lewis structures for the nitrite ion, \(\mathrm{NO}_{2}^{-} .\) (b) With what allotrope of oxygen is it isoelectronic? (c) What would you predict for the lengths of the bonds in \(\mathrm{NO}_{2}^{-}\) relative to \(\mathrm{N}-\mathrm{O}\) single bonds?

For the following collection of nonmetallic elements, \(\mathrm{O}\), \(\mathrm{P}, \mathrm{Te}, \mathrm{I}, \mathrm{B}\), (a) which two would form the most polar single bond? (b) Which two would form the longest single bond? (c) Which two would be likely to form a compound of formula \(\mathrm{XY}_{2}\) ? (d) Which combinations of elements would likely yield a compound of empirical formula \(\mathrm{X}_{2} \mathrm{Y}_{3} ?\) In each case explain your answer.

Draw Lewis structures for the following: (a) \(\mathrm{SiH}_{4}\), (b) \(\mathrm{CO}\), (c) \(\mathrm{SF}_{2}\), (d) \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}(\mathrm{H}\) is bonded to \(\mathrm{O})\), (e) \(\mathrm{ClO}_{2}^{-}\) (f) \(\mathrm{NH}_{2} \mathrm{OH}\).

(a) State the octet rule. (b) Does the octet rule apply to ionic as well as to covalent compounds? Explain, using examples as appropriate.

(a) Using average bond enthalpies, predict which of the following reactions will be most exothermic: (i) \(C(g)+2 \mathrm{~F}_{2}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{CF}_{4}(g)\) (ii) \(\mathrm{CO}(g)+3 \mathrm{~F}_{2} \longrightarrow \mathrm{CF}_{4}(g)+\mathrm{OF}_{2}(g)\) (iii) \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}(g)+4 \mathrm{~F}_{2} \longrightarrow \mathrm{CF}_{4}(g)+2 \mathrm{OF}_{2}(g)\) (b) Explain the trend, if any, that exists between reaction exothermicity and the extent to which the carbon atom is bonded to oxygen.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free