Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) What is the physical basis for the VSEPR model? (b) When applying the VSEPR model, we count a double or triple bond as a single electron domain. Why is this justified?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The physical basis for the VSEPR model is the repulsion between valence electron pairs due to their negative charge, causing them to arrange in a way that minimizes repulsions, ultimately determining the molecule's shape. When applying the VSEPR model, we consider double or triple bonds as a single electron domain because additional electron density from π bonds in multiple bonds does not significantly contribute to overall repulsion. This is due to the different spatial distribution of electron density in π bonds compared to σ bonds, and considering multiple bonds as single electron domains simplifies the model's application for predicting molecular shapes.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the VSEPR Model

The VSEPR (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion) model is a widely used model for predicting the shapes of molecules based on the assumption that electron pairs will repel each other and arrange themselves in a way that minimizes these repulsive forces. The model primarily focuses on the arrangement of electron pairs around the central atom of a molecule. These electron pairs can be either bonding pairs (shared between two atoms) or lone pairs (not shared with any other atoms). The VSEPR model is built on the observation that electron pairs in the valence shell of an atom are negatively charged and will repel each other. They will arrange themselves in a way that minimizes these repulsions, leading to the observed shape of the molecule.
02

Electron Domains and Their Representation in the VSEPR Model

When applying the VSEPR model, electron domains are used to describe the regions of electron density around a central atom. An electron domain can be a single bond, a double bond, a triple bond, or a lone pair of electrons. It is essential to determine the number of electron domains around an atom in order to predict the corresponding molecular geometry using the VSEPR model. Now, let's address the second part of the exercise, which asks why we can treat a double or triple bond as a single electron domain.
03

Justification for Treating Multiple Bonds as a Single Electron Domain

The reason behind treating a double or triple bond as a single electron domain in the VSEPR model is that the additional electron density from double and triple bonds do not significantly contribute to the overall repulsion between electron pairs. This is because multiple bonds consist of one sigma (σ) bond and additional pi (π) bonds, with π bonds having electron density distributed above and below the plane of the bond axis, rather than directly between the atoms. Consequently, the spatial extent of repulsion caused by pi (π) bonds is less significant than that of sigma (σ) bonds, which are between atoms. Since the VSEPR model primarily focuses on the minimization of repulsive forces between electron pairs, it is justified to consider single, double, and triple bonds as occupying single electron domains. This simplification makes the application of the VSEPR model more straightforward and practical for predicting molecular shapes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the molecule \(\mathrm{PF}_{4} \mathrm{Cl}\) (a) Draw a Lewis structure for the molecule, and predict its electron-domain geometry. (b) Which would you expect to take up more space, a \(\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{F}\) bond or a \(\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{Cl}\) bond? Explain. (c) Predict the molecular geometry of \(\mathrm{PF}_{4} \mathrm{Cl} .\) How did your answer for part (b) influence your answer here in part \((\mathrm{c}) ?(\mathbf{d})\) Would you expect the molecule to distort from its ideal electron-domain geometry? If so, how would it distort?

In which of these molecules or ions does the presence of nonbonding electron pairs produce an effect on molecular shape? (a) \(\operatorname{SiH}_{4,}(\mathbf{b}) \mathrm{PF}_{3},(\mathbf{c}) \mathrm{HBr},(\mathbf{d}) \mathrm{HCN},(\mathbf{e}) \mathrm{SO}_{2}\)

The Lewis structure for allene is Make a sketch of the structure of this molecule that is analogous to Figure \(9.25 .\) In addition, answer the following three questions: (a) Is the molecule planar? (b) Does it have a nonzero dipole moment? (c) Would the bonding in allene be described as delocalized? Explain.

Predict whether each of the following molecules is polar or nonpolar: \((\mathbf{a}){CCl}_{4},(\mathbf{b}) \mathrm{NH}_{3},(\mathbf{c}) \mathrm{SF}_{4},(\mathbf{d}) \mathrm{XeF}_{4},(\mathbf{e}) \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{Br}\)

Molecules that are brightly colored have a small energy gap between filled and empty electronic states (the HOMO-LUMO gap; see Exercise 9.104 ). Sometimes you can visually tell which HOMO-LUMO gap is larger for one molecule than another. Suppose you have samples of two crystalline powders-one is white, and one is green. Which one has the larger HOMO-LUMO gap?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free