Chapter 9: Problem 48
How would you expect the extent of overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals to vary in the series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2} ?\) Explain your answer.
Short Answer
Expert verified
In the series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\), the extent of overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals can be expected to vary as IF > ICl > IBr > \(I_{2}\). This is due to the balance between atomic size and electronegativity differences: as atomic size increases, the extent of overlap typically decreases, and a large difference in electronegativities also reduces the overlap as the electrons are more localized around the more electronegative atom.
Step by step solution
01
Understand Atomic Size and Electronegativity
In a covalent bond, atomic orbitals from the two atoms involved in the bond overlap in order to share electrons. The extent of overlap between these atomic orbitals depends on two important factors: the size of the atoms and their electronegativity. Bigger atomic size often results in less effective overlap, while the difference in electronegativity can lead to more polarized bond where electrons are shared unequally.
02
Atomic size across the series IF, ICl, IBr and \(I_{2}\)
In the given series, the central atom is iodine (I), and we are comparing its bonding with F, Cl, Br, and another iodine atom. As we move down a group in the periodic table, the atomic size increases. Thus, in the given series, we have the following order of atomic sizes:
F < Cl < Br < I
03
Electronegativity across the series IF, ICl, IBr and \(I_{2}\)
Electronegativity is a measure of the tendency of an atom to attract electrons towards itself in a chemical bond. The greater the difference in electronegativity between two atoms, the more polarized the bond will be. In this series, we have the following order of electronegativity (according to the Pauling scale):
F (3.98) > Cl (3.16) > Br (2.96) > I (2.66)
04
Determine the extent of overlap in each molecule
As atomic size increases, the extent of overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals typically decreases because the electron cloud gets more diffuse, resulting in a weaker bond. Similarly, a large difference in electronegativities also reduces the overlap as the electrons are more localized around the more electronegative atom. So the series can be analyzed as follows:
- IF: Here, the F atom is the smallest, resulting in better orbital overlap and the highest electronegativity difference between I and F. Thus, the extent of overlap will be relatively high but may be affected by the electronegativity difference.
- ICl: The Cl atom is larger than the F atom, so the extent of overlap would be expected to be slightly less compared to IF. The electronegativity difference between I and Cl is smaller, which should also result in more even sharing of electrons and slightly better overlap.
- IBr: The Br atom is larger than the Cl atom, so the orbital overlap would be expected to decrease further compared to ICl. Also, the electronegativity difference between I and Br is even smaller, leading to more even sharing of electrons, which might improve overlap slightly.
- \(I_{2}\): Here, both atoms are iodine and have the same size and electronegativity, so there is no electronegativity difference, leading to equal sharing of electrons. The large size of I, however, would decrease the orbital overlap compared to other cases.
05
Conclusion
In the series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\), the extent of overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals can be expected to vary as follows, due to the balance between atomic size and electronegativity differences:
IF > ICl > IBr > \(I_{2}\)
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Atomic Size
Atomic size refers to the size of an atom, which is determined by the distance from the nucleus to the outermost electrons. As you move down a group in the periodic table, atomic size increases. This is because each successive element has an additional electron shell, making the atom larger.
Larger atoms often have more diffuse electron clouds. This increased volume can make it more challenging for two atomic orbitals to overlap effectively, weakening the bond between the atoms involved. Therefore, a larger atomic size usually means less extent of orbital overlap.
The series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\) presents an interesting case study. Here, iodine is the central atom bonding with different halogens: F, Cl, Br, and I itself. Since F is the smallest and I is the largest element, you may notice that atomic size directly affects the quality and extent of the bonds formed.
Larger atoms often have more diffuse electron clouds. This increased volume can make it more challenging for two atomic orbitals to overlap effectively, weakening the bond between the atoms involved. Therefore, a larger atomic size usually means less extent of orbital overlap.
The series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\) presents an interesting case study. Here, iodine is the central atom bonding with different halogens: F, Cl, Br, and I itself. Since F is the smallest and I is the largest element, you may notice that atomic size directly affects the quality and extent of the bonds formed.
Electronegativity
Electronegativity measures an atom's ability to attract shared electrons in a chemical bond. In a covalent bond, the more electronegative atom will tend to attract the shared electrons closer, leading to a polar covalent bond.
In the series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\), there is a trend in electronegativity differences that deeply influences the extent of overlap. Fluorine (F) has the highest electronegativity at 3.98, causing a strong attraction for shared electrons. Chlorine (Cl), bromine (Br), and iodine (I) follow in decreasing order of electronegativity. As such, the electronegativity difference between I and F is the largest in the series, leading to a highly polarized bond.
While a greater difference in electronegativity can mean the electrons are not shared evenly, impacting the hybridization of the orbitals, it can also mean more electron density on the more electronegative atom, potentially affecting the strength and extent of bond overlap.
In the series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\), there is a trend in electronegativity differences that deeply influences the extent of overlap. Fluorine (F) has the highest electronegativity at 3.98, causing a strong attraction for shared electrons. Chlorine (Cl), bromine (Br), and iodine (I) follow in decreasing order of electronegativity. As such, the electronegativity difference between I and F is the largest in the series, leading to a highly polarized bond.
While a greater difference in electronegativity can mean the electrons are not shared evenly, impacting the hybridization of the orbitals, it can also mean more electron density on the more electronegative atom, potentially affecting the strength and extent of bond overlap.
Covalent Bonding
Covalent bonding involves the sharing of electrons between non-metal atoms to achieve stability. The effectiveness of this sharing greatly affects the stability and strength of the resulting molecule.
In the bonds formed in the series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\), the role of covalent bonding is crucial. The shared electron cloud results from the overlap of atomic orbitals from the participating atoms. The extent and strength of this overlap determine the characteristics of the bond. In stronger covalent bonds, the orbitals overlap significantly, allowing electrons to be held in close proximity to the nuclei, stabilizing the structure.
Understanding covalent bonding in terms of atomic size and electronegativity provides insight into why IF might exhibit stronger overlap than \(I_{2}\). Smaller electronegativity differences and larger atomic sizes may contribute to less effective covalent bonds in larger atoms, as seen with iodine.
In the bonds formed in the series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\), the role of covalent bonding is crucial. The shared electron cloud results from the overlap of atomic orbitals from the participating atoms. The extent and strength of this overlap determine the characteristics of the bond. In stronger covalent bonds, the orbitals overlap significantly, allowing electrons to be held in close proximity to the nuclei, stabilizing the structure.
Understanding covalent bonding in terms of atomic size and electronegativity provides insight into why IF might exhibit stronger overlap than \(I_{2}\). Smaller electronegativity differences and larger atomic sizes may contribute to less effective covalent bonds in larger atoms, as seen with iodine.
Orbital Overlap
Orbital overlap is a fundamental concept in understanding covalent bonds. It occurs when atomic orbitals from two different atoms occupy the same region of space, allowing for a shared electron pair. This overlap facilitates the bond formation, which can vary in strength and extent.
The effectiveness of orbital overlap is influenced by both atomic size and electronegativity. In the series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\), the variations in these factors lead to differing extents of overlap. The smaller and more electronegative an atom is, like fluorine, the better its orbitals can overlap with another atom, such as iodine. Conversely, for iodine atoms bonding with each other, the larger atomic size and equal electronegativity lead to poorer overlap.
Thus, orbital overlap is crucial for strong covalent bonds, and understanding how atomic size and polarity affect this overlap helps explain the gradation of bond strengths in different molecules.
The effectiveness of orbital overlap is influenced by both atomic size and electronegativity. In the series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\), the variations in these factors lead to differing extents of overlap. The smaller and more electronegative an atom is, like fluorine, the better its orbitals can overlap with another atom, such as iodine. Conversely, for iodine atoms bonding with each other, the larger atomic size and equal electronegativity lead to poorer overlap.
Thus, orbital overlap is crucial for strong covalent bonds, and understanding how atomic size and polarity affect this overlap helps explain the gradation of bond strengths in different molecules.
Periodic Trends
Periodic trends refer to patterns that can be observed across different periods and groups in the periodic table. These trends include changes in atomic size, electronegativity, ionization energy, and more.
The series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\) provides an excellent example of how periodic trends impact chemical bonding. Within the halogens, as you move down the group, both atomic size and bond length increase, leading to decreased extent of orbital overlap. Conversely, electronegativity typically decreases, impacting bond polarity and strength.
Understanding periodic trends allows us to predict and rationalize the properties of elements and compounds. They help explain why smaller, more electronegative atoms like fluorine create strong overlaps in bonds compared to larger atoms like iodine. This foundational knowledge is key to grasping the nature of chemical interactions and variations across the periodic table.
The series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\) provides an excellent example of how periodic trends impact chemical bonding. Within the halogens, as you move down the group, both atomic size and bond length increase, leading to decreased extent of orbital overlap. Conversely, electronegativity typically decreases, impacting bond polarity and strength.
Understanding periodic trends allows us to predict and rationalize the properties of elements and compounds. They help explain why smaller, more electronegative atoms like fluorine create strong overlaps in bonds compared to larger atoms like iodine. This foundational knowledge is key to grasping the nature of chemical interactions and variations across the periodic table.
