Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As we move across a period of the periodic table, why do the sizes of the transition elements change more gradually than those of the representative elements?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The more gradual change in atomic size for transition elements across a period compared to representative elements is mainly due to greater electron shielding experienced by transition elements. This occurs because transition elements have their outer electrons in more diffuse d orbitals, which partially neutralize the increased nuclear charge, allowing for a more gradual change in atomic size as we move across a period.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Atomic Size

Atomic size refers to the distance between the nucleus and the outermost electrons of an atom. As we move across a period in the periodic table, the atomic size typically decreases. This decrease is due to an increase in the nuclear charge (number of protons), which pulls the electrons closer to the nucleus.
02

Differences between Representative and Transition Elements

Representative elements, also called main group elements, belong to groups 1, 2, and 13 to 18 of the periodic table. In contrast, transition elements are found in groups 3 to 12. The key difference between these two types of elements lies in their electron configurations. Representative elements gain or lose electrons to achieve a stable, full outer electron shell, while transition elements tend to fill their inner d subshells.
03

Electron Shielding in Transition Elements

As we move across a period, the electrons occupy the same energy level but in different orbitals for transition elements. This means that these electrons are in a d subshell apart from the outermost s orbital, while the representative elements' outermost electrons occupy the s or p orbitals in the same energy level. Since the d subshell has more diffused and less tightly held electrons than the s and p orbitals, transition elements experience greater electron shielding. This shielding effect partially neutralizes the increase in nuclear charge, as it keeps the outer electrons from being pulled in as tightly.
04

Gradual Change in Atomic Size for Transition Elements

Due to the greater electron shielding experienced by transition elements, their atomic size does not shrink as rapidly as representative elements as we move across a period. The more diffuse d orbitals mitigate the increased nuclear charge's effect, which causes a more gradual change in atomic size among transition elements. In summary, the sizes of transition elements change more gradually than those of the representative elements across a period because of the greater electron shielding experienced by transition elements due to their d subshell electron configurations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Little is known about the properties of astatine, At, because of its rarity and high radioactivity. Nevertheless, it is possible for us to make many predictions about its properties. (a) Do you expect the element to be a gas, liquid, or solid at room temperature? Explain. (b) Would you expect At to be a metal, nonmetal, or metalloid? Explain. (c) What is the chemical formula of the compound it forms with Na?

Potassium superoxide, \(\mathrm{KO}_{2},\) is often used in oxygen masks (such as those used by firefighters) because \(\mathrm{KO}_{2}\) reacts with \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) to release molecular oxygen. Experiments indicate that 2 \(\mathrm{mol}\) of \(\mathrm{KO}_{2}(s)\) react with each mole of= \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}(g) .\) (a) The products of the reaction are \(\mathrm{K}_{2} \mathrm{CO}_{3}(s)\) and \(\mathrm{O}_{2}(g) .\) Write a balanced equation for the reaction between \(\mathrm{KO}_{2}(s)\) and \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}(g) .(\mathbf{b})\) Indicate the oxidation number for each atom involved in the reaction in part (a). What elements are being oxidized and reduced? (c) What mass of \(\mathrm{KO}_{2}(s)\) is needed to consume 18.0 \(\mathrm{g} \mathrm{CO}_{2}(g) ?\) What mass of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}(g)\) is produced during this reaction?

Write a balanced equation for the reaction that occurs in each of the following cases: (a) Cesium is added to water. (b) Strontium is added to water. (c) Sodium reacts with oxygen. (d) Calcium reacts with iodine.

For each of the following pairs, indicate which element has the smaller first ionization energy: (a) Ti, Ba; (b) Ag, Cu; (c) Ge, Cl; (d) Pb, Sb.

Mercury in the environment can exist in oxidation states 0, +1, and +2. One major question in environmental chemistry research is how to best measure the oxidation state of mercury in natural systems; this is made more complicated by the fact that mercury can be reduced or oxidized on surfaces differently than it would be if it were free in solution. XPS, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, is a technique related to PES (see Exercise 7.111), but instead of using ultraviolet light to eject valence electrons, X rays are used to eject core electrons. The energies of the core electrons are different for different oxidation states of the element. In one set of experiments, researchers examined mercury contamination of minerals in water. They measured the XPS signals that corresponded to electrons ejected from mercury’s 4\(f\) orbitals at 105 eV, from an X-ray source that provided 1253.6 \(\mathrm{eV}\) of energy \(\left(1 \mathrm{ev}=1.602 \times 10^{-19} \mathrm{J}\right)\) The oxygen on the mineral surface gave emitted electron energies at \(531 \mathrm{eV},\) corresponding to the 1 \(\mathrm{s}\) orbital of oxygen. Overall the researchers concluded that oxidation states were \(+2\) for \(\mathrm{Hg}\) and \(-2\) for \(\mathrm{O}\) (a) Calculate the wavelength of the X rays used in this experiment. (b) Compare the energies of the 4f electrons in mercury and the 1s electrons in oxygen from these data to the first ionization energies of mercury and oxygen from the data in this chapter. (c) Write out the ground- state electron configurations for \(\mathrm{Hg}^{2+}\) and \(\mathrm{O}^{2-} ;\) which electrons are the valence electrons in each case?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free