Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The phosphorus trihalides \(\left(\mathrm{PX}_{3}\right)\) show the following variation in the bond angle \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{X}: \mathrm{PF}_{3,}, 96.3^{\circ} ; \mathrm{PCl}_{3}, 100.3^{\circ}\); \(\mathrm{PBr}_{3}, 101.0^{\circ} ; \mathrm{PI}_{3}, 102.0^{\circ}\). The trend is generally attributed to the change in the electronegativity of the halogen. (a) Assuming that all electron domains are the same size, what value of the \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{X}\) angle is predicted by the VSEPR model? (b) What is the general trend in the \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{X}\) angle as the halide electronegativity increases? (c) Using the VSEPR model, explain the observed trend in \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{X}\) angle as the electronegativity of \(\mathrm{X}\) changes. (d) Based on your answer to part (c), predict the structure of \(\mathrm{PBrCl}_{4}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, the VSEPR model predicts a bond angle of 109.5° for the phosphorus trihalides. The bond angle increases as the halide electronegativity decreases, which can be attributed to the decrease in repulsion between the lone pair and bond pairs. Based on the VSEPR model, the structure of \(\mathrm{PBrCl}_{4}\) is seesaw-shaped with two axial chlorine and two equatorial bromine atoms.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Predicting the bond angle using VSEPR model

The VSEPR (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion) model is used to predict the shape of a molecule based on the arrangement of valence electrons and minimizing the repulsion between the electron pairs. Let's consider a phosphorus trihalide, \(\mathrm{PX}_{3}\). Phosphorus has five valence electrons and the halogen atom has seven valence electrons. Since there is one phosphorus atom and three halogen atoms, the central atom is phosphorus. The three valence electrons from three halogen atoms form three single bonds with phosphorus, and the remaining two valence electrons on phosphorus form one lone pair. Now, there are three bond pairs and one lone pair around the phosphorus atom. According to the VSEPR model, such a molecule has a trigonal pyramidal shape. The predicted bond angle \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{X}\) between the three bond pairs in a trigonal pyramidal shape is based on the tetrahedral angle: 109.5°.
02

(b) Trend in the bond angle based on halide electronegativity

The trend observed in the given data set is: \(\mathrm{PF}_{3} < \mathrm{PCl}_{3} < \mathrm{PBr}_{3} < \mathrm{PI}_{3}\) The bond angle increases as we move from \(\mathrm{PF}_{3}\) to \(\mathrm{PI}_{3}\). As we know, electronegativity decreases down a group, so the electronegativity of the halogen atom decreases in the following order: F > Cl > Br > I Thus, based on the given data, the general trend in the \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{X}\) angle is that it increases as the halide electronegativity decreases.
03

(c) Explanation using VSEPR model

The observed trend in the bond angle can be explained using the VSEPR model as follows: For \(\mathrm{PF}_{3}\), the bond angle is less than the predicted angle, because fluorine has the highest electronegativity among all the halogens, and as a result, it attracts the shared electrons in the bond towards itself. This leads to a more significant repulsion between the lone pair and the bond pairs. This repulsion shrinks the angle, making it smaller than the predicted bond angle of 109.5°. As we move from \(\mathrm{PF}_{3}\) to \(\mathrm{PI}_{3}\), the electronegativity of the halogen atom decreases, and so does the lone pair-bonding pair repulsion. Therefore, the bond angle becomes larger, leading to the observed trend.
04

(d) Predicting the structure of \(\mathrm{PBrCl}_{4}\)

In the \(\mathrm{PBrCl}_{4}\) molecule, the central atom is phosphorus, which forms four single bonds with bromine and chlorine atoms and has a lone pair of electrons. The distribution of electron pairs around phosphorus is: - Four electron pairs from bonding with the four halogen atoms (Bromine and Chlorine) - One lone pair from the remaining two valence electrons of the phosphorus atom According to the VSEPR model, with four bond pairs and one lone pair, the molecule will have a seesaw shape. That is, two chlorine atoms (smaller electronegativity) will be in axial positions and two bromine atoms (larger electronegativity) will be in equatorial positions. Therefore, the structure of \(\mathrm{PBrCl}_{4}\) is predicted to be seesaw-shaped with two axial chlorine and two equatorial bromine atoms.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Phosphorus Trihalides
Phosphorus trihalides are a group of chemical compounds made up of one phosphorus atom and three halogen atoms, represented by the chemical formula \( \text{PX}_3 \), where \( \text{X} \) denotes the halogen (such as fluorine, chlorine, bromine, or iodine). These compounds offer a unique way to study molecular geometry because they exhibit different properties based on the substituting halide.
The central phosphorus atom in these trihalides utilizes its five valence electrons to form bonds with the halogen atoms. Generally, phosphorus bonds with three halogen atoms and has a pair of non-bonding electrons (lone pair), which makes them a classic example for applying the Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) model to predict their geometric structure.
When considering phosphorus trihalides, molecular geometry often depends on the size, electronegativity, and number of atoms surrounding the central phosphorus, influencing the chemical and physical properties of these compounds.
Electronegativity
Electronegativity is a crucial concept in understanding molecular geometry and the properties of chemical compounds. It describes the ability of an atom to attract electrons when forming a covalent bond. The difference in electronegativity between atoms can quite dramatically influence not only the bonding type but also the properties of the resulting molecules.
In the context of phosphorus trihalides, electronegativity plays a key role in determining bond angles and molecular shape. Generally, as one moves down the halide group in the periodic table from fluorine to iodine, electronegativity decreases.
This decrease in electronegativity affects the electron distribution in phosphorus trihalides:
  • Fluorine, being the most electronegative, pulls electron density towards itself more effectively, which increases lone pair-bond pair repulsion, resulting in a smaller bond angle.
  • Conversely, iodine is less electronegative, leading to decreased repulsion and a larger bond angle.
This relationship between electronegativity and bond angle is key to both explaining and predicting trends among phosphorus trihalides.
Molecular Geometry
Molecular geometry is the three-dimensional arrangement of atoms within a molecule and is pivotal for understanding the chemical behavior and interaction of substances. The VSEPR model is essential for predicting the shapes of molecules, such as phosphorus trihalides.
For compounds like \( \text{PX}_3 \), the molecular geometry is influenced by the number of atoms bonded to a central atom (in this case, phosphorus) and the presence of lone pairs of electrons.
In phosphorus trihalides, phosphorus forms three bonds with halogens and holds one lone pair of electrons. According to VSEPR theory, this configuration results in a trigonal pyramidal shape:
  • The lone pair on phosphorus pushes the bonded atoms away, minimizing bond pair repulsions.
  • This arrangement leads to a distortion from the ideal tetrahedral angle (109.5°) to a slightly smaller bond angle.
This geometry is critical in determining how phosphorus trihalides will interact with other compounds, influencing both reactivity and polarity.
Bond Angle
Bond angles are the angles formed between the neighboring bonds in a molecule. They are crucial for defining the shape and properties of the molecule, such as how it will interact with other substances. In the case of phosphorus trihalides, the bond angle can inform us about the spatial arrangement of atoms and the effect of different substituents on the molecule's overall geometry.
The VSEPR model helps predict bond angles in molecules based on the idea of electron pair repulsion, stating that electron pairs around a central atom will arrange themselves as far apart as possible to minimize repulsion.
For \( \text{PX}_3 \) molecules, the bond angle is influenced by:
  • Lone pair-bond pair repulsion, which generally decreases the angle below the ideal tetrahedral value.
  • Changes in halogen electronegativity, where higher electronegativity leads to tighter bond angle due to increased repulsion involving the lone pair.
Specifically, in phosphorus trihalides, the bond angle increases as the electronegativity of the halogen decreases, which is explained by reducing repulsion between bond pairs. Understanding these angles is fundamental for applying VSEPR theory and predicting molecule behavior.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) The nitric oxide molecule, \(\mathrm{NO}\), readily loses one electron to form the \(\mathrm{NO}^{+}\)ion. Which of the following is the best explanation of why this happens: (i) Oxygen is more electronegative than nitrogen, (ii) The highest energy electron in NO lies in a \(\pi_{2 p}^{*}\) molecular orbital, or (iii) The \(\pi_{2 p}^{*} \mathrm{MO}\) in NO is completely filled. (b) Predict the order of the \(\mathrm{N}-\mathrm{O}\) bond strengths in \(\mathrm{NO}^{-} \mathrm{NO}^{+}\), and \(\mathrm{NO}^{-}\), and deseribe the magnetic properties of each. (c) With what neutral homonuclear diatomic molecules are the \(\mathrm{NO}^{+}\)and \(\mathrm{NO}^{-}\)ions isoelectronic (same number of electrons)?

What is the hybridization of the central atom in (a) \(\mathrm{SiCl}_{4}\), (b) \(\mathrm{HCN}^{\text {, }}\) (c) \(\mathrm{SO}_{3}\), (d) \(\mathrm{TeCl}_{2}\).

(a) Using only the valence atomic orbitals of a hydrogen atom and a fluorine atom, and following the model of Figure \(9.46\), how many MOs would you expect for the HF molecule? (b) How many of the MOs from part (a) would be occupied by electrons? (c) It turns out that the difference in energies between the valence atomic orbitals of \(\mathrm{H}\) and \(\mathrm{F}\) are sufficiently different that we can neglect the interaction of the \(1 s\) orbital of hydrogen with the \(2 s\) orbital of fluorine. The \(1 s\) orbital of hydrogen will mix only with one \(2 p\) orbital of fluorine. Draw pictures showing the proper orientation of all three \(2 p\) orbitals on \(\mathrm{F}\) interacting with a 1 s orbital on \(\mathrm{H}\). Which of the \(2 p\) orbitals can actually make a bond with a \(1 s\) orbital, assuming that the atoms lie on the \(z\)-axis? (d) In the most accepted picture of HF, all the other atomic orbitals on fluorine move over at the same energy into the molecular orbital energy-level diagram for HF. These are called "nonbonding orbitals." Sketch the energy-level diagram for HF using this information and calculate the bond order. (Nonbonding electrons do not contribute to bond order.) (e) Look at the Lewis structure for HF. Where are the nonbonding electrons?

(a) Which geometry and central atom hybridization would you expect in the series \(\mathrm{BH}_{4}^{-}, \mathrm{CH}_{4}, \mathrm{NH}_{4}^{+}\)? (b) What would you expect for the magnitude and direction of the bond dipoles in this series? (c) Write the formulas for the analogous species of the elements of period 3 ; would you expect them to have the same hybridization at the central atom?

The nitrogen atoms in \(N_{2}\) participate in multiple bonding, whereas those in hydrazine, \(\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{4}\), do not. (a) Draw Lewis structures for both molecules. (b) What is the hybridization of the nitrogen atoms in each molecule? (c) Which molecule has the stronger \(\mathrm{N}-\mathrm{N}\) bond?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free