Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Write the electron configuration for the first excited state for \(\mathrm{N}_{2}\), that is, the state with the highest-energy electron moved to the next available energy level. (a) Is the nitrogen in its first excited state diamagnetic or paramagnetic? (b) Is the \(\mathrm{N}-\mathrm{N}\) bond strength in the first excited state stronger or weaker compared to that in the ground state?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The electron configuration for the first excited state of N2 is σ(1s)² < σ*(1s)² < σ(2s)² < σ*(2s)² < π(2p)⁴ < σ(2p)¹ < π*(2p)¹ < σ*(2p)0. (a) The nitrogen in its first excited state is paramagnetic due to the presence of unpaired electrons in the σ(2p) and π*(2p) orbitals. (b) The N-N bond strength in the first excited state is weaker compared to that in the ground state, as the bond order in the first excited state (2) is lower than that in the ground state (3).

Step by step solution

01

Determine the electron configuration for the ground state of N2

To determine the electron configuration, we should know that Nitrogen has 7 electrons, so N2 will have a total of 14 electrons. Nitrogen belongs to the second period in the periodic table, so its electron configuration can be written as: \(1s^2 2s^2 2p^3\). Since we have two nitrogen atoms, we need to fill the molecular orbitals (MOs) according to the Aufbau principle (from lower to higher energy levels) and Hund's rule (maximize the unpaired electrons). The MO energy levels for N2 are: σ(1s) < σ*(1s) < σ(2s) < σ*(2s) < π(2p) < σ(2p) < π*(2p) < σ*(2p) Now let's fill the MOs with 14 electrons: σ(1s)² < σ*(1s)² < σ(2s)² < σ*(2s)² < π(2p)⁴ < σ(2p)² < π*(2p)0 < σ*(2p)0
02

Determine the electron configuration for the first excited state of N2

For the first excited state, we will move the highest-energy electron to the next available energy level: σ(1s)² < σ*(1s)² < σ(2s)² < σ*(2s)² < π(2p)⁴ < σ(2p)¹ < π*(2p)¹ < σ*(2p)0
03

Determine if the nitrogen in its first excited state is diamagnetic or paramagnetic

Diamagnetic substances have all of their electrons paired, while paramagnetic substances have at least one unpaired electron. In our case, we have unpaired electrons in the σ(2p) and π*(2p) orbitals: σ(1s)² < σ*(1s)² < σ(2s)² < σ*(2s)² < π(2p)⁴ < σ(2p)¹ < π*(2p)¹ < σ*(2p)0 So, the nitrogen in its first excited state is paramagnetic.
04

Compare the N-N bond strength in the first excited state with that in the ground state

The bond order is given by the formula: Bond order = (Number of electrons in bonding orbitals - Number of electrons in antibonding orbitals) / 2 For the ground state: Bond order = (10 - 4) / 2 = 3 For the first excited state: Bond order = (9 - 5) / 2 = 2 The bond strength is directly proportional to the bond order. Since the bond order in the first excited state (2) is lower than that in the ground state (3), the N-N bond strength in the first excited state is weaker compared to that in the ground state.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Molecular Orbitals
Understanding molecular orbitals (MOs) is vital for analyzing chemical bonding in molecules. MOs are formed when atomic orbitals, which are the regions around an individual atom where electrons are likely to be found, overlap between two or more atoms in a molecule.

According to the MO theory, these orbitals can be categorized as bonding, antibonding, or non-bonding. Bonding orbitals lower the energy of the system and hold the atoms together, as they are filled with pairs of electrons from each atom. In contrast, electrons in antibonding orbitals can weaken relationships due to their higher energy.

The filling of these orbitals in diatomic nitrogen (2) follows the principles of Aufbau (filling from lowest energy level), Pauli Exclusion (each orbital hosts at most two electrons with opposite spins), and Hund's (maximize unpaired electrons before pairing up). When we move an electron to create an 'excited state', we shift an electron from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). This process, as shown in the exercise, changes the electron configuration and often the magnetic properties and bonding strength within the molecule.
Paramagnetic vs Diamagnetic
The concepts of paramagnetism and diamagnetism describe how substances react in magnetic fields, which is largely based on the electron configurations within their atoms or molecules.

Materials that are diamagnetic have all their electrons paired up within orbitals, leading to a cancelation of their magnetic moments. Thus, diamagnetic substances do not exhibit attraction to magnetic fields and might even be repelled by them. On the other hand, paramagnetic substances have unpaired electrons, which imbue them with temporary magnetic moments when they are in the presence of a magnetic field, resulting in attraction towards it.

The nitrogen molecule in its first excited state, as indicated by the solution, shows paramagnetism due to the presence of unpaired electrons in the π*(2p) and σ(2p) orbitals. This fundamental concept helps to understand and predict the behavior of substances in various chemical and physical contexts.
Bond Order Calculation
Bond order is a mathematical representation used to give an indication of the strength and stability of a bond in molecular orbital theory. It is determined by taking the difference in the number of electrons occupying bonding and antibonding orbitals divided by two.

Mathematically, it can be expressed as:

[Bond order = \(\frac{(Number \ of \ electrons \ in \ bonding \ orbitals - Number \ of \ electrons \ in \ antibonding \ orbitals)}{2}\)]A higher bond order typically suggests a stronger and more stable bond. As the exercise reveals, the bond order for the ground state of 2 is 3, indicating a very strong triple bond. In the first excited state, the bond order drops to 2 due to the shifting of an electron to an antibonding orbital, reflecting a decrease in bond strength to that of a double bond. This demonstrates how excitation can affect molecular stability, which is critical for students to grasp when studying chemical reactions and molecular dynamics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the \(\mathrm{H}_{2}^{+}\)ion. (a) Sketch the molecular orbitals of the ion and draw its energy-level diagram. (b) How many electrons are there in the \(\mathrm{H}_{2}^{+}\)ion? (c) Write the electron configuration of the ion in terms of its MOs. (d) What is the bond order in \(\mathrm{H}_{2}^{+}\)? (e) Suppose that the ion is excited by light so that an electron moves from a lower-energy to a higherenergy MO. Would you expect the excited-state \(\mathrm{H}_{2}^{+}\)ion to be stable or to fall apart? (f) Which of the following statements about part (e) is correct: (i) The light excites an electron from a bonding orbital to an antibonding orbital, (ii) The light excites an electron from an antibonding orbital to a bonding orbital, or (iii) In the excited state there are more bonding electrons than antibonding electrons?

(a) The \(\mathrm{PH}_{3}\) molecule is polar. Does this offer experimental proof that the molecule cannot be planar? Explain. (b) It turns out that ozone, \(\mathrm{O}_{3}\), has a small dipole moment. How is this possible, given that all the atoms are the same?

(a) Using only the valence atomic orbitals of a hydrogen atom and a fluorine atom, and following the model of Figure \(9.46\), how many MOs would you expect for the HF molecule? (b) How many of the MOs from part (a) would be occupied by electrons? (c) It turns out that the difference in energies between the valence atomic orbitals of \(\mathrm{H}\) and \(\mathrm{F}\) are sufficiently different that we can neglect the interaction of the \(1 s\) orbital of hydrogen with the \(2 s\) orbital of fluorine. The \(1 s\) orbital of hydrogen will mix only with one \(2 p\) orbital of fluorine. Draw pictures showing the proper orientation of all three \(2 p\) orbitals on \(\mathrm{F}\) interacting with a 1 s orbital on \(\mathrm{H}\). Which of the \(2 p\) orbitals can actually make a bond with a \(1 s\) orbital, assuming that the atoms lie on the \(z\)-axis? (d) In the most accepted picture of HF, all the other atomic orbitals on fluorine move over at the same energy into the molecular orbital energy-level diagram for HF. These are called "nonbonding orbitals." Sketch the energy-level diagram for HF using this information and calculate the bond order. (Nonbonding electrons do not contribute to bond order.) (e) Look at the Lewis structure for HF. Where are the nonbonding electrons?

Dichloroethylene \(\left(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right)\) has three forms (isomers), each of which is a different substance. (a) Draw Lewis structures of the three isomers, all of which have a carbon-carbon double bond. (b) Which of these isomers has a zero dipole moment? (c) How many isomeric forms can chloroethylene, \(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{3} \mathrm{Cl}\), have? Would they be expected to have dipole moments?

The \(\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{H}\) bond lengths in the water molecule \(\left(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\right)\) are \(0.96 \AA\), and the \(\mathrm{H}-\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{H}\) angle is \(104.5^{\circ}\). The dipole moment of the water molecule is \(1.85\) D. (a) In what directions do the bond dipoles of the \(\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{H}\) bonds point? In what direction does the dipole moment vector of the water molecule point? (b) Calculate the magnitude of the bond dipole of the \(\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{H}\) bonds. (Note: You will need to use vector addition to do this.) (c) Compare your answer from part (b) to the dipole moments of the hydrogen halides (Table 8.3). Is your answer in accord with the relative electronegativity of oxygen?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free