Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As we move across a period of the periodic table, why do the sizes of the transition elements change more gradually than those of the representative elements?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sizes of transition elements change more gradually across a period compared to the representative elements because the additional d-electrons filling their d orbitals are less effective at shielding the outermost electrons from the increasing nuclear charge. This results in a slower decrease in atomic size compared to the regular trend observed in representative elements, which are primarily filling their s and p orbitals.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the transition and representative elements

The representative elements are the elements found in groups 1A to 7A in the periodic table, while the transition elements are the ones located in group 3 through group 12, the d-block. Representative elements exhibit regular trends in atomic size, ionization energy, and electron affinity, while transition elements have more complicated trends owing to their electron configurations.
02

Details about atomic size

Atomic size is generally measured by the atomic radius, the distance from the nucleus to the outermost electron shell. It's important to note that as we move across a period, the atomic number (number of protons) increases, leading to a higher effective nuclear charge on the electrons. This increased charge causes the electrons to be more strongly attracted to the nucleus, reducing the atomic size.
03

Comparing atomic size trends in representative elements

Representative elements follow a predictable trend in atomic size across a period. As the atomic number increases, the atomic size decreases. This decrease in atomic size is due to the increase in effective nuclear charge experienced by the outermost electrons. These elements adhere closely to this trend since they are filling their s and p orbitals across the period, and there is limited shielding effect from inner electron shells.
04

Exploring atomic size trends in transition elements

In transition elements, the size changes more gradually as we move across a period. The transition metals fill their d orbitals, which are located between the outermost s and p electrons. The d-orbitals' ability to shield the outer electrons from the nucleus's increasing positive charge is weaker compared to the s and p orbitals. Therefore, the increase in effective nuclear charge is only partially offset by the increased shielding provided by the additional d-electrons. Consequently, the atomic size does not reduce as drastically as it does in the representative elements.
05

Concluding the explanation

In summary, the sizes of transition elements change more gradually across a period compared to the representative elements because the additional d-electrons filling their d orbitals are less effective at shielding the outermost electrons from the increasing nuclear charge. This results in a slower decrease in atomic size compared to the regular trend observed in representative elements, which are primarily filling their s and p orbitals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Why does xenon react with fluorine, whereas neon does not? (b) Using appropriate reference sources, look up the bond lengths of Xe-F bonds in several molecules. How do these numbers compare to the bond lengths calculated from the atomic radii of the elements?

Which will experience the greater effective nuclear charge, the electrons in the \(n=3\) shell in Ar or the \(n=3\) shell in \(\mathrm{Kr}\) ? Which will be closer to the nucleus?

Detailed calculations show that the value of \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for the outermost electrons in \(\mathrm{Na}\) and \(\mathrm{K}\) atoms is \(2.51+\) and \(3.49+\), respectively. (a) What value do you estimate for \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) experienced by the outermost electron in both \(\mathrm{Na}\) and \(\mathrm{K}\) by assuming core electrons contribute \(1.00\) and valence electrons contribute \(0.00\) to the screening constant? (b) What values do you estimate for \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) using Slater's rules? (c) Which approach gives a more accurate estimate of \(Z_{\text {eff ? }}\) ? (d) Does either method of approximation account for the gradual increase in \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) that occurs upon moving down a group? (e) Predict \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for the outermost electrons in the \(\mathrm{Rb}\) atom based on the calculations for \(\mathrm{Na}\) and \(\mathrm{K}\).

Potassium superoxide, \(\mathrm{KO}_{2}\), is often used in oxygen masks (such as those used by firefighters) because \(\mathrm{KO}_{2}\) reacts with \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) to release molecular oxygen. Experiments indicate that \(2 \mathrm{~mol}\) of \(\mathrm{KO}_{2}(s)\) react with each mole of \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}(g)\). (a) The products of the reaction are \(\mathrm{K}_{2} \mathrm{CO}_{3}(s)\) and \(\mathrm{O}_{2}(g)\). Write a balanced equation for the reaction between \(\mathrm{KO}_{2}(s)\) and \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}(g)\). (b) Indicate the oxidation number for each atom involved in the reaction in part (a). What elements are being oxidized and reduced? (c) What mass of \(\mathrm{KO}_{2}(s)\) is needed to consume \(18.0 \mathrm{~g} \mathrm{CO}_{2}(\mathrm{~g})\) ? What mass of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}(g)\) is produced during this reaction?

We will see in Chapter 12 that semiconductors are materials that conduct electricity better than nonmetals but not as well as metals. The only two elements in the periodic table that are technologically useful semiconductors are silicon and germanium. Integrated circuits in computer chips today are based on silicon. Compound semiconductors are also used in the electronics industry. Examples are gallium arsenide, GaAs; gallium phosphide, GaP; cadmium sulfide, CdS; and cadmium selenide, CdSe. (a) What is the relationship between the compound semiconductors' compositions and the positions of their elements on the periodic table relative to \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Ge}\) ? (b) Workers in the semiconductor industry refer to "II-VI" and "III-V" materials, using Roman numerals. Can you identify which compound semiconductors are II-VI and which are III-V? (c) Suggest other compositions of compound semiconductors based on the positions of their elements in the periodic table.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free