Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the first ionization energy of neon and the electron affinity of fluorine. (a) Write equations, including electron configurations, for each process. (b) These two quantities have opposite signs. Which will be positive, and which will be negative? (c) Would you expect the magnitudes of these two quantities to be equal? If not, which one would you expect to be larger?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Ionization energy of Ne: \(Ne(g) \rightarrow Ne^{+}(g) + e^-\), Electron affinity of F: \(F(g) + e^- \rightarrow F^-(g)\). (b) Ionization energy of Ne is positive, electron affinity of F is negative. (c) Magnitudes are not equal; first ionization energy of Ne is expected to be larger than the electron affinity of F.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Electron configurations and ionization energy of neon and electron affinity of fluorine

To analyze the processes, we first need to write the electron configurations for neon (Ne) and fluorine (F). - Neon (Ne) has an atomic number of 10, and its electron configuration is 1s² 2s² 2p⁶. - Fluorine (F) has an atomic number of 9, and its electron configuration is 1s² 2s² 2p⁵. Now, let's write the equations for the first ionization energy of Ne and the electron affinity for F. Ionization energy of Ne: \(Ne(g) \rightarrow Ne^{+}(g) + e^-\) Electron affinity of F: \(F(g) + e^- \rightarrow F^-(g)\)
02

(b) Positive and negative quantities

Now, we will determine which of the two quantities have opposite signs. The first ionization energy is the energy required to remove one electron from an atom, so it's an energy input (positive) process. Therefore, the first ionization energy of Ne will be positive. The electron affinity is the energy released when an electron is added to an atom, so it's an energy output (negative) process. So, the electron affinity of F will be negative.
03

(c) Equality of magnitudes and the larger one

We need to analyze if the magnitudes of these two quantities are equal and, if not, which one is larger. In general, ionization energies are greater than electron affinities. First ionization energy is a result of overcoming the attractive force between the positively charged nucleus and the negatively charged electron. In contrast, electron affinity is defined as the amount of energy released when an electron is added to a neutral atom. Since Neon has a stable electron configuration (full 2p subshell), it's more difficult to remove an electron from it; hence, requiring larger ionization energy. While Fluorine has a strong effective nuclear charge and high electron affinity, it does not have a stable electron configuration. This means that removing an electron from Ne is more difficult compared to adding an electron to F. So, we can conclude that the magnitudes of these quantities are not equal, and the first ionization energy of Ne is expected to be larger than the electron affinity of F.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Using only the periodic table, arrange each set of atoms in order from largest to smallest: (a) K, Li, Cs; (b) Pb, Sn, Si; (c) F, O, N.

Arrange the following oxides in order of increasing acidity: $$ \mathrm{CO}_{2}, \mathrm{CaO}, \mathrm{Al}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{3}, \mathrm{SO}_{3}, \mathrm{SiO}_{2}, \mathrm{P}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{5} \text {. } $$

Using only the periodic table, arrange each set of atoms in order of increasing radius: (a) \(\mathrm{Ba}, \mathrm{Ca}, \mathrm{Na}\); (b) In, \(\mathrm{Sn}, \mathrm{As}\); (c) \(\mathrm{Al}, \mathrm{Be}, \mathrm{Si}\).

(a) Why does Li have a larger first ionization energy than \(\mathrm{Na}\) ? (b) The difference between the third and fourth ionization energies of scandium is much larger than that of titanium. Why? (c) Why does Li have a much larger second ionization energy than Be?

Detailed calculations show that the value of \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for the outermost electrons in \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}\) atoms is \(4.29+\) and \(6.12+\), respectively. (a) What value do you estimate for \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) experienced by the outermost electron in both \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}\) by assuming core electrons contribute \(1.00\) and valence electrons contribute \(0.00\) to the screening constant? (b) What values do you estimate for \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) using Slater's rules? (c) Which approach gives a more accurate estimate of \(Z_{\text {eff? }}\) ? (d) Which method of approximation more accurately accounts for the steady increase in \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) that occurs upon moving left to right across a period? (e) Predict \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for a valence electron in \(\mathrm{P}\), phosphorus, based on the calculations for \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free