Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Mercury in the environment can exist in oxidation states \(0,+1\), and \(+2\). One major question in environmental chemistry research is how to best measure the oxidation state of mercury in natural systems; this is made more complicated by the fact that mercury can be reduced or oxidized on surfaces differently than it would be if it were free in solution. XPS, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, is a technique related to PES (see Exercise 7.111), but instead of using ultraviolet light to eject valence electrons, \(\mathrm{X}\) rays are used to eject core electrons. The energies of the core electrons are different for different oxidation states of the element. In one set of experiments, researchers examined mercury contamination of minerals in water. They measured the XPS signals that corresponded to electrons ejected from mercury's \(4 f\) orbitals at \(105 \mathrm{eV}\), from an X-ray source that provided \(1253.6 \mathrm{eV}\) of energy. The oxygen on the mineral surface gave emitted electron energies at \(531 \mathrm{eV}\), corresponding to the \(1 s\) orbital of oxygen. Overall the researchers concluded that oxidation states were \(+2\) for \(\mathrm{Hg}\) and \(-2\) for \(\mathrm{O}\). (a) Calculate the wavelength of the \(\mathrm{X}\) rays used in this experiment. (b) Compare the energies of the \(4 f\) electrons in mercury and the \(1 s\) electrons in oxygen from these data to the first ionization energies of mercury and oxygen from the data in this chapter. (c) Write out the ground-state electron configurations for \(\mathrm{Hg}^{2+}\) and \(\mathrm{O}^{2-}\); which electrons are the valence electrons in each case? (d) Use Slater's rules to estimate \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for the \(4 f\) and valence electrons of \(\mathrm{Hg}^{2+}\) and \(\mathrm{O}^{2-}\); assume for this purpose that all the inner electrons with \((n-3)\) or less screen a full \(+1\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this exercise, we calculated the wavelength of the X-rays used in the experiment as \(9.875 \times 10^{7} \text{m}\). We compared the energies of the 4f electrons in Mercury and the 1s electrons in Oxygen with the first ionization energies to find that they differ significantly. We also determined the ground-state electron configurations for Hg^2+ and O^2-, and using Slater's rules, estimated the effective nuclear charge (Zeff) for the valence electrons in both ions to be +4.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Use Planck's equation to find the wavelength

From the given energy (1253.6 eV), we should first convert it into joules: 1 eV = 1.602 × 10^(-19) J So, 1253.6 eV = 1253.6 × 1.602 × 10^(-19) J = 2.008 × 10^(-16) J Now, we use Planck's equation to find the wavelength (λ): \[E = h \frac{c}{\lambda }\] Where E is the energy (in joules), h is Planck's constant (6.62607 x 10^(-34) Js), and c is the speed of light (3 × 10^8 m/s). Rearranging for λ, we get: \[\lambda = \frac{hc}{E}\] Now we plug in the values: \[\lambda = \frac{6.62607 \times 10^{-34} \text{ Js} \times 3 \times 10^8 \text{ m/s}}{2.008 \times 10^{-16} \text{ J}}\] \[\lambda = 9.875 \times 10^7 \text{ m}\] 2. (b) Compare the energies of the 4f electrons and 1s electrons to the first ionization energies
02

(b) Calculate energies of the 4f electrons and 1s electrons

We have the energies of the 4f orbitals for mercury (Hg) and the 1s orbitals for oxygen (O): - Mercury's 4f orbital = 105 eV - Oxygen's 1s orbital = 531 eV Now, we need to compare these with the first ionization energies from the text: - Mercury's first ionization energy = 1007.1 kJ/mol - Oxygen's first ionization energy = 1313.9 kJ/mol To compare, we need to convert these ionization energies into eV per atom as well: 1 kJ/mol = 96.49 eV/mol, so: - Mercury's first ionization energy = 1007.1 kJ/mol * (1/96.49 eV/mol) = 10.44 eV/atom - Oxygen's first ionization energy = 1313.9 kJ/mol * (1/96.49 eV/mol) = 13.62 eV/atom 3. (c) Write the ground-state electron configurations for Hg^2+ and O^2-
03

(c) Determine the electron configurations for Hg^2+ and O^2-

We should write the standard electron configuration for each ion: - Mercury (Hg): \[1s^{2}2s^{2}2p^{6}3s^{2}3p^{6}4s^{2}3d^{10}4p^{6}5s^{2}4d^{10}5p^{6}6s^{2}5d^{10}4f^{14}5d^{10}6s^{2}\] Since it's Hg^2+ (meaning it lost 2 electrons), its electron configuration is: \[1s^{2}2s^{2}2p^{6}3s^{2}3p^{6}4s^{2}3d^{10}4p^{6}5s^{2}4d^{10}5p^{6}6s^{2}4f^{14}5d^{10}\] - Oxygen (O): \[1s^{2}2s^{2}2p^{4}\] Since it's O^2- (meaning it gained 2 electrons), its electron configuration is: \[1s^{2}2s^{2}2p^{6}\] 4. (d) Estimate Zeff for the 4f and valence electrons of Hg^2+ and O^2-
04

(d) Calculate the effective nuclear charge (Zeff) for Hg^2+ and O^2-

We have to apply Slater's rules to estimate the effective nuclear charge (Zeff) for the valence electrons. The 4f electrons are the valence electrons for Hg^2+ and the 2p electrons for O^2-. We will assume that all the inner electrons with (n-3) or less screen a full +1 shield. - For the 4f electrons in Hg^2+: Zeff = Z - S = (80 - Total screening constant) = 80 - (2 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 10 + 6 + 2 + 10 + 6 + 2 + 14 + 10) = 80 - 76 = +4 - For the 2p electrons in O^2-: Zeff = Z - S = (8 - Total screening constant) = 8 - (2 + 2) = 8 - 4 = +4 So, Zeff for the 4f electrons in Hg^2+ is +4, and for the 2p electrons in O^2- is also +4.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Oxidation State Measurement
Understanding the oxidation states of elements, particularly in environmental chemistry, is crucial for interpreting how elements interact with their surroundings. The oxidation state, often referred to as the oxidation number, is a measure of the degree of oxidation of an atom in a chemical compound. Technically, it represents how many electrons an atom either gains or loses when it forms chemical bonds.

One common way to measure the oxidation state is by assessing the electron configuration of atoms in a molecule and following certain rules. For instance, the oxidation state of an atom in its elemental form is zero. When combined in a compound, the electron configuration changes and one can assign oxidation states based on the atom's tendency to attract electrons. In common practice, oxygen is usually assigned an oxidation state of (-2) and hydrogen is (+1), unless bonded to metals where it can be (-1).

However, a more sophisticated method used for determining oxidation states in a more complex environment, such as a mineral surface in water, is X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). This process involves the analysis of the energy of electrons ejected from atoms in response to X-ray irradiation, which can reveal detailed information about the chemical state and environment of the atoms being studied. The variation in energy levels of emitted electrons corresponds to different oxidation states. This is because binding energies of core-level electrons are influenced by the effective nuclear charge experienced by these electrons, which changes with different oxidation states.
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
XPS stands for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, a versatile and non-destructive analytical technique used to study the surface composition of materials. It operates on the basic principle of the photoelectric effect, where X-rays are used to eject core electrons from atoms, and the kinetic energy of these ejected electrons is measured.

In practice, a material is irradiated with an X-ray beam of known energy. Electrons are emitted from the sample's surface due to the interaction and their kinetic energy is analyzed. The analysis requires precise energy measurements since the differences in binding energies are often subtle. The binding energy depends on the electron configuration of the atom and is specific to each element and its oxidation state. As seen in the exercise, energies of mercury's 4f orbitals and oxygen's 1s orbitals were measured, offering insights into their respective chemical states.

An advantage of XPS is its ability to provide both quantitative and qualitative data about the surface layers of a material, often up to 10nm deep. It can determine not only what elements are present but also their chemical states, which can be crucial for environmental research where the surfaces of materials, and interactions at those surfaces, are of significant interest.
Electron Configuration
The electron configuration of an atom describes the distribution of electrons in atomic orbitals. Each electron occupies the lowest energy orbital available, a pattern known as the Aufbau principle. The electron configuration can predict chemical and physical properties, such as magnetism, chemical reactivity, and different state interactions.

For a neutral or charged atom (an ion), the electron configuration changes to reflect the gain or loss of electrons. For example, mercury in its 2+ ion state has lost two electrons compared to its neutral state. This electrons are lost from the outermost shell, altering the electron configuration significantly. Similarly, when oxygen gains two electrons to form an O2- ion, it achieves a noble gas configuration, which impacts its reactivity and interactions with other elements. Determining the electron configurations for elements in different oxidation states, as was done in the exercise for Hg2+ and O2-, is foundational for predicting how ions will behave chemically.

As students encounter problems like this, it's essential to comprehend how and why electron configurations change with ionization. This understanding leads to deeper insights into the fundamentals of chemistry, including the engagements of ions with their environments or in a variety of chemical reactions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Detailed calculations show that the value of \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for the outermost electrons in \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}\) atoms is \(4.29+\) and \(6.12+\), respectively. (a) What value do you estimate for \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) experienced by the outermost electron in both \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}\) by assuming core electrons contribute \(1.00\) and valence electrons contribute \(0.00\) to the screening constant? (b) What values do you estimate for \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) using Slater's rules? (c) Which approach gives a more accurate estimate of \(Z_{\text {eff? }}\) ? (d) Which method of approximation more accurately accounts for the steady increase in \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) that occurs upon moving left to right across a period? (e) Predict \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for a valence electron in \(\mathrm{P}\), phosphorus, based on the calculations for \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}\).

Which of the following statements about effective nuclear charge for the outermost valence electron of an atom is incorrect? (i) The effective nuclear charge can be thought of as the true nuclear charge minus a screening constant due to the other electrons in the atom. (ii) Effective nuclear charge increases going left to right across a row of the periodic table. (iii) Valence electrons screen the nuclear charge more effectively than do core electrons. (iv) The effective nuclear charge shows a sudden decrease when we go from the end of one row to the beginning of the next row of the periodic table. (v) The change in effective nuclear charge going down a column of the periodic table is generally less than that going across a row of the periodic table.

Zinc in its 2+ oxidation state is an essential metal ion for life. \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) is found bound to many proteins that are involved in biological processes, but unfortunately \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) is hard to detect by common chemical methods. Therefore, scientists who are interested in studying \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\)-containing proteins frequently substitute \(\mathrm{Cd}^{2+}\) for \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\), since \(\mathrm{Cd}^{2+}\) is easier to detect. (a) On the basis of the properties of the elements and ions discussed in this chapter and their positions in the periodic table, describe the pros and cons of using \(\mathrm{Cd}^{2+}\) as a \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) substitute. (b) Proteins that speed up (catalyze) chemical reactions are called enzymes. Many enzymes are required for proper metabolic reactions in the body. One problem with using \(\mathrm{Cd}^{2+}\) to replace \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) in enzymes is that \(\mathrm{Cd}^{2+}\) substitution can decrease or even eliminate enzymatic activity. Can you suggest a different metal ion that might replace \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) in enzymes instead of \(\mathrm{Cd}^{2+}\) ? Justify your answer.

Hydrogen is an unusual element because it behaves in some ways like the alkali metal elements and in other ways like nonmetals. Its properties can be explained in part by its electron configuration and by the values for its ionization energy and electron affinity. (a) Explain why the electron affinity of hydrogen is much closer to the values for the alkali elements than for the halogens. (b) Is the following statement true? "Hydrogen has the smallest bonding atomic radius of any element that forms chemical compounds. If not, correct it. If it is, explain in terms of electron configurations. (c) Explain why the ionization energy of hydrogen is closer to the values for the halogens than for the alkali metals. (d) The hydride ion is \(\mathrm{H}\). Write out the process corresponding to the first ionization energy of the hydride ion. (e) How does the process in part (d) compare to the process for the electron affinity of a neutral hydrogen atom?

The first ionization energy and electron affinity of Ar are both positive values. (a) What is the significance of the positive value in each case? (b) What are the units of electron affinity?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free