Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A manganese complex formed from a solution containing potassium bromide and oxalate ion is purified and analyzed. It contains \(10.0 \% \mathrm{Mn}, 28.6 \%\) potassium, \(8.8 \%\) carbon, and \(29.2 \%\) bromine by mass. The remainder of the compound is oxygen. An aqueous solution of the complex has about the same electrical conductivity as an equimolar solution of \(\mathrm{K}_{4}\left[\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CN})_{\mathrm{S}}\right]\). Write the formula of the compound, using brackets to denote the manganese and its coordination sphere.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The formula of the manganese complex is \(\text{K}_4[\text{Mn}(\text{C}_2\text{O}_4)_2\text{Br}_2]\), which is determined using the given percentages of elements and their molar masses, and assuming the same number of ionic species in its formula as \(\mathrm{K}_{4}\left[\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CN})_{\mathrm{S}}\right]\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the number of moles of each element

Given the percentages of each element by mass, we will assume 100 grams of the compound. From this assumption, we can calculate the number of moles for each element using their respective molar masses: - Moles of Mn = \(\frac{10.0\ \text{g}}{54.94\ \text{g/mol}}\) = \(0.182\ \text{mol}\) - Moles of K = \(\frac{28.6\ \text{g}}{39.10\ \text{g/mol}}\) = \(0.731\ \text{mol}\) - Moles of C = \(\frac{8.8\ \text{g}}{12.01\ \text{g/mol}}\) = \(0.733\ \text{mol}\) - Moles of Br = \(\frac{29.2\ \text{g}}{79.90\ \text{g/mol}}\) = \(0.365\ \text{mol}\) For the remaining oxygen, we can find the mass and then calculate the moles: - Mass of O = \(100.0\ \text{g} - (10.0\ \text{g} + 28.6\ \text{g} + 8.8\ \text{g} + 29.2\ \text{g})\) = \(23.4\ \text{g}\) - Moles of O = \(\frac{23.4\ \text{g}}{16.00\ \text{g/mol}}\) = \(1.46\ \text{mol}\)
02

Normalize the mole ratios

To find the empirical formula, we need to normalize the mole ratios by dividing each by the smallest number of moles: - Mn: \(\frac{0.182}{0.182} = 1\) - K: \(\frac{0.731}{0.182} \approx 4\) - C: \(\frac{0.733}{0.182} \approx 4\) - Br: \(\frac{0.365}{0.182} = 2\) - O: \(\frac{1.46}{0.182} = 8\)
03

Write the empirical formula

Based on the normalized mole ratios, the empirical formula is: \( \text{K}_4\text{Mn}(\text{C}_2\text{O}_4)_2\text{Br}_2\)
04

Write the formula of the complex

According to the exercise, we need to write the formula of the compound using brackets to denote the manganese and its coordination sphere. Since the coordination sphere includes the oxalate ion, we have: \( \text{K}_4[\text{Mn}(\text{C}_2\text{O}_4)_2\text{Br}_2]\) This is the formula of the manganese complex.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Empirical Formula Calculation
Understanding how to calculate the empirical formula is a foundational concept in chemistry, especially when analyzing the composition of a compound. The empirical formula is the simplest integer ratio of elements in a compound. It doesn't reflect the exact number of atoms, but gives a proportional representation of each type of atom within the compound.

To calculate the empirical formula, one should begin by determining the amount of each element in grams. Using the assumption that we're dealing with a 100-gram sample simplifies the math, allowing us to treat percentage composition as direct gram measurements. The next step is to convert the mass of each element to moles using their atomic or molar masses. This yields a mole quantity for each element involved.

After finding the moles of each element, the key to determining the empirical formula is to divide each element's mole quantity by the smallest mole quantity found among the elements. This division helps normalize the ratios, making them easier to compare. The resulting values are rounded to the nearest whole number, as empirical formulas must consist of whole numbers of atoms. In some instances, multiplication of these whole numbers may be required to eliminate decimal places, allowing for an accurate empirical formula.

For example, in the exercise, once the moles of each element are known, dividing each by the smallest moles, in this case, manganese with 0.182 moles, yields the normalized mole ratio. This ratio is then used to express the empirical formula in the simplest integer terms.
Mole Ratio Normalization
Mole ratio normalization is a critical step in the empirical formula calculation process. After the moles of each constituent element are determined, the normalization process involves creating a ratio of each element relative to the element with the smallest mole quantity. This is done to find the simplest ratio in which the elements combine to form the compound.

This simplification is based on the principle that chemical compounds form in set proportions according to the Law of Definite Proportions. By dividing the mole quantity of every element by the smallest mole quantity, we achieve normalized ratios, which ideally should be whole numbers. If they aren't, they may be multiplied by an appropriate factor to convert them to whole numbers, as we see with the mole ratios of potassium, carbon, and oxygen in the manganese complex problem.

It's essential to approach this methodically because these normalized ratios correspond directly to the subscript numbers in the empirical formula. Through careful calculation and rounding when necessary (while considering significant figures), we arrive at the empirical formula—a crucial piece of information for chemists in understanding the makeup of a substance.
Coordination Chemistry
Coordination chemistry involves the study of compounds characterized by coordination compounds, in which a central atom, usually a metal, binds to a group of molecules or anions called ligands. These ligands possess 'lone pairs', which they can donate to an empty orbital of a central metal atom or ion, forming coordinate covalent bonds.

In the case of the manganese complex in the exercise, the central metal ion is manganese (Mn), and its ligands are oxalate ions (C2O4) and bromine atoms (Br). The coordination sphere consists of those atoms or molecules bonded directly to the central metal ion, and in this example, the oxalate ions and bromine atoms belong to manganese’s coordination sphere.

In notation, the coordination sphere is enclosed within square brackets to differentiate the complex from ions that are not directly attached to the metal ion, like the potassium ions (K) in our problem. The coordination sphere's charge determines the charge balance with the other ions present. The exercise specifies that the complex behaves similarly in conductivity to potassium ferrocyanide, K4[Fe(CN)6], suggesting the overall charge is balanced with an equal number of cations (K+) and the manganese complex anion carrying a charge resulting from the central ion and its ligands.

Coordination compounds like this manganese complex are ubiquitous in biochemistry, catalysis, and materials science due to the unique properties arising from the metal-ligand interactions. The nuanced understanding of these interactions is fundamental to manipulating and applying these compounds in various technological and scientific contexts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A four-coordinate complex \(\mathrm{MA}_{2} \mathrm{~B}_{2}\) is prepared and found to have two different isomers. Is it possible to determine from this information whether the complex is square planar or tetrahedral? If so, which is it?

Explain why the transition metals in periods 5 anges have \(C\) nearly identical radii in each group.

The complex \(\left[\mathrm{Ru}(\mathrm{EDTA})\left(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\right)\right]^{-}\)undergoes substitution reactions with several ligands, replacing the water molecule with the ligand. In all cases, the ruthenium stays in the \(+3\) oxidation state and the ligands use a nitrogen donor atom to bind to the metal. $$ \left[\operatorname{Ru}(\mathrm{EDTA})\left(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\right)\right]^{-}+\mathrm{L} \longrightarrow[\operatorname{Ru}(\mathrm{EDTA}) \mathrm{L}]^{-}+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O} $$ The rate constants for several ligands are as follows: (a) One possible mechanism for this substitution reaction is that the water molecule dissociates from the Ru(III) in the rate-determining step, and then the ligand L binds to Ru(III) in a rapid second step. A second possible mechanism is that L approaches the complex, begins to form a new bond to the Ru(III), and displaces the water molecule, all in a single concerted step. Which of these two mechanisms is more consistent with the data? Explain. (b) What do the results suggest about the relative donor ability of the nitrogens of the three ligands toward Ru(TII))? (c) Assuming that the complexes are all low spin, how many unpaired electrons are in each?

A Cu electrode is immersed in a solution that is \(1.00 \mathrm{M}\) in \(\left[\mathrm{Cu}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4}\right]^{2+}\) and \(1.00 \mathrm{M}\) in \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\). When the cathode is a standard hydrogen electrode, the emf of the cell is found to be \(+0.08 \mathrm{~V}\). What is the formation constant for \(\left[\mathrm{Cu}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4}\right]^{2+}\) ?

Write the names of the following compounds, using the standard nomenclature rules for coordination complexes: (a) \(\left[\mathrm{Rh}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right] \mathrm{Cl}\) (b) \(\mathrm{K}_{2}\left[\mathrm{TiCl}_{6}\right]\) (c) \(\mathrm{MoOCl}_{4}\) (d) \(\left[\mathrm{Pt}\left(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\right)_{4}\left(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{4}\right)\right] \mathrm{Br}_{2}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free