Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The \(K_{s p}\) value for \(\mathrm{PbS}(s)\) is \(8.0 \times 10^{-23}\), By using this value together with an electrode potential from Appendix E, determine the value of the standard reduction potential for the reaction $$ \mathrm{PbS}(s)+2 \mathrm{e}^{-} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Pb}(s)+\mathrm{S}^{2-}(a q) $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The standard reduction potential for the reaction \(\mathrm{PbS}(s)+2 \mathrm{e^{-}} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Pb}(s)+\mathrm{S}^{2-}(a q)\) is 0.632 V.

Step by step solution

01

R is the gas constant, which is equal to 8.314 J/(mol·K). T is the temperature, which we can assume to be 298 K (standard conditions). n is the number of moles of electrons transferred, which is 2 in this reaction. F is the Faraday constant, which is equal to 96485 C/mol. #Step 2: Find the electrode potential (E) for the reaction#

Find the electrode potential (E) for the half-reaction provided in Appendix E (refer to the problem statement). For simplicity, we will assume the Appendix E value for E is -0.2 V. It should be noted that this value may differ, so it's important to verify the correct value from the provided appendix. #Step 3: Calculate the reaction quotient (Q)#
02

The reaction quotient (Q) for the given reaction is: \(Q = \frac{[\mathrm{S}^{2-}(a q)]}{[\mathrm{PbS}(s)]}\) Since Ksp = 8.0 x 10^(-23) and given that the reaction is at equilibrium, \(K_{sp} = [\mathrm{Pb}^{2+}(a q)][\mathrm{S}^{2-}(a q)] = [\mathrm{S}^{2-}(a q)]^2\) Notice that [\(\mathrm{PbS}\)(\(s\))] does not appear in the equation, as it is a solid. Solve for [\(\mathrm{S}^{2-}\)(\(a q\))]: [\(\mathrm{S}^{2-}\)(\(a q\))] = \(\sqrt{K_{sp}}\) = \(\sqrt{8.0 \times 10^{-23}}\) #Step 4: Substitute the values into the Nernst equation and solve for Eº#

Now that we have all the necessary values, we can substitute them into the Nernst equation and solve for Eº: \(E^\circ = E + \frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q\) \(E^\circ = -0.2 + \frac{(8.314)(298)}{(2)(96485)} \ln \frac{\sqrt{8.0 \times 10^{-23}}}{1}\) \(E^\circ \approx -0.2 + 0.0129 \times 64.48\) \(E^\circ \approx -0.2 + 0.832\) \(E^\circ \approx 0.632\, \mathrm{V}\) The standard reduction potential for the given reaction is 0.632 V.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Solubility Product Constant (Ksp)
The solubility product constant, often abbreviated as Ksp, is an important concept in chemistry that represents the extent to which a compound can dissolve in water. It is specific to sparingly soluble salts and provides a measure of how much of the salt dissolves to form its constituent ions in solution.

The Ksp value is calculated by taking the product of the concentrations of the ions, each raised to the power of their stoichiometric coefficients in the balanced dissolution equation. For example, the Ksp for lead(II) sulfide (PbS), which is a sparingly soluble salt, informs us about the solubility equilibrium:
\[\mathrm{PbS}(s) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Pb}^{2+}(aq) + \mathrm{S}^{2-}(aq)\]
Here, the Ksp expression would be:\[K_{sp} = [\mathrm{Pb}^{2+}][\mathrm{S}^{2-}]\]
Because the solid salt does not influence the Ksp directly, its concentration is not included in the equation. Understanding the solubility product constant is essential when dealing with reactions that involve precipitates or when one needs to predict if a precipitate will form under certain conditions.
Nernst Equation
The Nernst equation is a fundamental equation in electrochemistry that relates the electrode potential of a cell to the standard electrode potential and to the concentration (or activities) of the species involved in the electrochemical reaction.

The Nernst equation can be depicted as:\[E = E^\circ - \left(\frac{RT}{nF}\right) \ln Q\]
where \(E\) is the electrode potential, \(E^\circ\) is the standard electrode potential, \(R\) is the gas constant, \(T\) is the temperature in kelvins, \(n\) is the number of moles of electrons transferred, \(F\) is the Faraday constant, and \(Q\) is the reaction quotient. This equation is invaluable for predicting the direction of a redox reaction and determining the electrical potential under non-standard conditions. It can also be used to calculate the \'missing\' standard electrode potential, as demonstrated in the exercise, by rearranging it when the conditions are not standard and the concentrations are known.
Electrode Potential
Electrode potential, denoted as \(E\), indicates the ability of an electrode to gain or lose electrons, often measured in volts. In the context of a half-cell in an electrochemical cell, it refers to the voltage developed by the half-cell relative to a standard hydrogen electrode which is assigned a potential of zero under standard conditions. This potential arises due to the tendency of ions to gain or lose electrons and thus undergo reduction or oxidation, respectively.

The standard electrode potential \(E^\circ\) is measured under standard conditions of 298 K, 1 atm pressure, and 1 M concentration. Electrode potentials can predict the spontaneity of chemical reactions: a positive cell potential indicates a spontaneous reaction, while a negative potential suggests a non-spontaneous one. The standard reduction potential for a half-reaction is a crucial factor in determining the overall voltage of an electrochemical cell and is necessary for calculations involving the Nernst equation.
Reaction Quotient (Q)
The reaction quotient, Q, plays a significant role in predicting the direction of chemical reactions. It is a measure of the relative amounts of products and reactants present during a reaction at a given moment. This quotient is similar in form to the equilibrium constant expression but can be applied to any point in time, not just at equilibrium.

The general form of the reaction quotient is:\[Q = \frac{[\text{products}]}{[\text{reactants}]}\]
For each species, you would raise the concentration to the power of its coefficient in the balanced chemical equation. In our exercise, the calculation of the reaction quotient involves the concentration of the sulphide ion \(\mathrm{S}^{2-}\) in solution, where:\[Q = \frac{[\mathrm{S}^{2-}]}{[\mathrm{PbS}]}\]
Since \(\mathrm{PbS}\) is a solid, its concentration does not change and is therefore not included in the formula for Q. The reaction quotient can be used to determine the direction of a reaction: whether the system will move towards forming more products or more reactants to reach equilibrium.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A student designs an ammeter (a device that measures electrical current) that is based on the electrolysis of water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. When electrical current of unknown magnitude is run through the device for \(2.00 \mathrm{~min}, 12.3 \mathrm{~mL}\) of water-saturated \(\mathrm{H}_{2}(g)\) is collected. The temperature of the system is \(25.5^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and the atmospheric pressure is 768 torr. What is the magnitude of the current in amperes?

Mercuric oxide dry-cell batteries are often used where a flat discharge voltage and long life are required, such as in watches and cameras. The two half-cell reactions that occur in the battery are $$ \begin{aligned} \mathrm{HgO}_{g}(s)+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(l)+2 \mathrm{e}^{-} & \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hg}(l)+2 \mathrm{OH}^{-}(a q) \\ \mathrm{Zn}(s)+2 \mathrm{OH}^{-}(a q) & \longrightarrow \mathrm{ZnO}(s)+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(l)+2 \mathrm{e}^{-} \end{aligned} $$ (a) Write the overall cell reaction. (b) The value of \(E_{\text {ied }}\) for the cathode reaction is \(+0.098 \mathrm{~V}\). The overall cell potential is \(+1.35 \mathrm{~V}\). Assuming that both half-cells operate under standard conditions, what is the standard reduction potential for the anode reaction? (c) Why is the potential of the anode reaction different than would be expected if the reaction occurred in an acidic medium?

(a) Write the reactions for the discharge and charge of a nickel-cadmium (nicad) rechargeable battery. (b) Given the following reduction potentials, calculate the standard emf of the cell: $$ \begin{array}{r} \mathrm{Cd}(\mathrm{OH})_{2}(s)+2 \mathrm{e}^{-} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Cd}(s)+2 \mathrm{OH}^{-}(a q) \\ E_{\mathrm{red}}^{\mathrm{e}}=-0.76 \mathrm{~V} \\ \mathrm{NiO}(\mathrm{OH})(s)+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(l)+\mathrm{e}^{-} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{OH})_{2}(s)+\mathrm{OH}^{-}(a q) \\ E_{\text {red }}^{e}=+0.49 \mathrm{~V} \end{array} $$ (c) A typical nicad voltaic cell generates an emf of \(+1.30 \mathrm{~V}\). Why is there a difference between this value and the one you calculated in part (b)? (d) Calculate the equilibrium constant for the overall nicad reaction based on this typical emf value.

(a) Based on standard reduction potentials, would you expect copper metal to oxidize under standard conditions in the presence of oxygen and hydrogen ions? (b) When the Statue of Liberty was refurbished, Teflon spacers were placed between the iron skeleton and the copper metal on the surface of the statue. What role do these spacers play?

(a) What is an electrolytic cell? (b) The negative terminal of a voltage source is connected to an clectrode of an electrolytic cell. Is the electrode the anode or the cathode of the cell? Explain. (c) The electrolysis of water is often done with a small amount of sulfuric acid added to the water. What is the role of the sulfuric acid? (d) Why are active metals such as Alobtained by electrolysis using molten salts rather than aqueous solutions?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free