Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What evidence supports the notion that buckyballs are actual molecules and not extended materials? (a) Buckyballs are made of carbon. (b) Buckyballs have a well-defined atomic structure and molecular weight. (c) Buckyballs have a well-defined melting point. (d) Buckyballs are semiconductors. (e) More than one of the previous choices.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correct answer is (e) More than one of the previous choices, as both (b) Buckyballs have a well-defined atomic structure and molecular weight, and (c) Buckyballs have a well-defined melting point, provide evidence that buckyballs are actual molecules.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the difference between molecules and extended materials

First, let's understand the difference between a molecule and an extended material. A molecule is formed when two or more atoms join together chemically and has a definite structure and composition, whereas an extended material is a continuous arrangement of atoms, ions, or molecules over a large scale without a definite structure or composition.
02

Analyzing option (a)

(a) Buckyballs are made of carbon. This statement is true. Buckyballs, also known as fullerene, are a type of carbon allotrope, made entirely of carbon atoms. However, this fact alone does not provide definitive evidence that buckyballs are molecules instead of extended materials, since other carbon-based materials, like graphene or diamond, also consist of carbon atoms and can be extended materials.
03

Analyzing option (b)

(b) Buckyballs have a well-defined atomic structure and molecular weight. This statement also holds true for buckyballs, which are composed of 60 carbon atoms arranged in a soccer-ball like structure, and have a definite molecular weight. The well-defined structure and molecular weight are important characteristics of a molecule, as opposed to extended materials. Thus, this option provides strong evidence that buckyballs are actual molecules.
04

Analyzing option (c)

(c) Buckyballs have a well-defined melting point. A well-defined melting point is characteristic of a substance with a stable molecular structure, since it indicates the temperature at which the bonds between the molecules break down. This fact further supports the idea that buckyballs are actual molecules, rather than extended materials.
05

Analyzing option (d)

(d) Buckyballs are semiconductors. While it is true that buckyballs possess properties of semiconductors, this fact is not sufficient to classify them as molecules or extended materials. Semiconducting properties can be found in both molecular and extended materials, so this option does not provide definitive evidence that buckyballs are actual molecules.
06

Deciding on the correct answer(s)

Based on our analysis, options (b) and (c) provide evidence that buckyballs have characteristics of actual molecules, rather than extended materials. Option (a) is true, but it doesn't provide conclusive evidence. Option (d) is also correct, but it doesn't differentiate between molecules and extended materials. Therefore, the correct answer is (e) More than one of the previous choices, as both (b) and (c) provide evidence that buckyballs are actual molecules.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the minimum number of atoms that could be contained in the unit cell of an element with a body-centered cubic lattice? (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, (d) 4, (e) 5 .

Which of the following statements does not follow from the fact that the alkali metals have relatively weak metal-metal bonding? (a) The alkali metals are less dense than other metals. (b) The alkali metals are soft enough to be cut with a knife. (c) The alkali metals are more reactive than other metals. (d) The alkali metals have higher melting points than other metals. (e) The alkali metals have low ionization energies.

Indicate whether each statement is true or false: (a) Intermetallic compounds have a fixed composition. (b) Copper is the majority component in both brass and bronze. (c) In stainless steel, the chromium atoms occupy interstitial positions.

A particular form of cinnabar (HgS) adopts the zinc blende structure. The length of the unit cell edge is \(5.852 \AA\). (a) Calculate the density of \(\mathrm{HgS}\) in this form. (b) The mineral tiemmanite ( \(\mathrm{HgSe}\) ) also forms a solid phase with the zinc blende structure. The length of the unit cell edge in this mineral is \(6.085 \AA\). What accounts for the larger unit cell length in tiemmanite? (c) Which of the two substances has the higher density? How do you account for the difference in densities?

The rutile and fluorite structures, shown here (anions are colored green), are two of the most common structure types of ionic compounds where the cation to anion ratio is \(1: 2\). (a) For \(\mathrm{CaF}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{ZnF}_{2}\) use ionic radii, \(\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}(r=1.14 \mathrm{~A}), \mathrm{Zn}^{2+}(r=0.88 \mathrm{~A})\), and \(\mathrm{F}(r=1.19 \mathrm{~A})\), to predict which compound is more likely to crystallize with the fluorite structure and which with the rutile structure. (b) What are the coordination numbers of the cations and anions in each of these structures?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free