Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Covalent bonding occurs in both molecular and covalentnetwork solids. Which of the following statements best explains why these two kinds of solids differ so greatly in their hardness and melting points? (a) The molecules in molecular solids have stronger covalent bonding than covalent-network solids do. (b) The molecules in molecular solids are held together by weak intermolecular interactions. (c) The atoms in covalent-network solids are more polarizable than those in molecular solids. (d) Molecular solids are denser than covalent-network solids.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The best explanation for the difference in hardness and melting points between molecular and covalent-network solids is that the molecules in molecular solids are held together by weak intermolecular interactions (Statement b).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Molecular and Covalent-Network Solids

Molecular solids are formed by molecules held together by weak intermolecular forces like van der Waals forces or hydrogen bonding. Covalent-network solids, on the other hand, are formed by atoms connected through strong covalent bonds throughout the whole network.
02

Analyzing the Statements

(a) Covalent bonds are stronger than intermolecular forces; therefore, this statement is incorrect as it suggests that molecular solids have stronger bonding than covalent-network solids. (b) This statement suggests that the molecules in molecular solids are held together by weak intermolecular forces. This statement is correct, as molecular solids are held together by weak forces like van der Waals forces or hydrogen bonds. (c) Polarizability refers to the ease with which an atom's electron cloud can be distorted. This statement is not relevant to the difference in hardness and melting points between molecular and covalent-network solids. Additionally, polarizability is not an overarching factor which distinguishes these two types of solids. (d) Density is a measure of mass per unit volume. This statement is also not relevant to the difference in hardness and melting points between molecular and covalent-network solids. Density may differ between individual substances, but there is no general trend that supports this statement.
03

Choosing the Best Explanation

Based on our analysis, the best explanation for the difference in hardness and melting points between molecular and covalent-network solids is statement (b): The molecules in molecular solids are held together by weak intermolecular interactions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

GaAs and GaP make solid solutions that have the same crystal structure as the parent materials, with \(\mathrm{As}\) and \(\mathrm{P}\) randomly distributed throughout the crystal. \(\mathrm{GaP}_{x} \mathrm{~A} s_{1-x}\) exists for any value of \(x\). If we assume that the band gap varies linearly with composition between \(x=0\) and \(x=1\), estimate the band gap for \(\mathrm{GaP}_{0.5} \mathrm{As}_{05}\). (See the previous two exercises for GaAs and GaP band gaps.) What wavelength of light does this correspond to?

Indicate whether each statement is true or false: (a) The band gap of a semiconductor decreases as the particle size decreases in the 1-10-nm range. (b) The light that is emitted from a semiconductor, upon external stimulation, becomes longer in wavelength as the particle size of the semiconductor decreases.

The rutile and fluorite structures, shown here (anions are colored green), are two of the most common structure types of ionic compounds where the cation to anion ratio is \(1: 2\). (a) For \(\mathrm{CaF}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{ZnF}_{2}\) use ionic radii, \(\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}(r=1.14 \mathrm{~A}), \mathrm{Zn}^{2+}(r=0.88 \mathrm{~A})\), and \(\mathrm{F}(r=1.19 \mathrm{~A})\), to predict which compound is more likely to crystallize with the fluorite structure and which with the rutile structure. (b) What are the coordination numbers of the cations and anions in each of these structures?

What is the minimum number of atoms that could be contained in the unit cell of an element with a body-centered cubic lattice? (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, (d) 4, (e) 5 .

(a) Draw a picture that represents a crystalline solid at the atomic level. (b) Now draw a picture that represents an amorphous solid at the atomic level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free